한국인 학습자들의 영어 관계절 처리에서 나타나는 어려움의 원천과 자기 조절 읽기
Sources of Korean English Learners' Processing Difficulty in Relative Clauses: Evidence from Self-paced Reading
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Two self-paced reading experiments investigated the factors that influence the processing difficulty in relative clauses. Korean learners proficient in English participated in the experiments and the semantic factor and the locality factor were manipulated in the materials. The first experiment showed that there was no difference of the processing difficulty between object relative clauses and subject relative clauses with plausible sentential subjects. The second experiment showed that the processing difficulty of object relative clauses was greatly decreased when the sentential subject was inanimate. Additionally, it is noteworthy that the comprehension accuracy of subject relative clauses is lower than object relative clauses'. These results suggest that both of the semantic factor and working memory influence the processing and comprehension in relative clauses
Abstract
Two self-paced reading experiments investigated the factors that influence the processing difficulty in relative clauses. Korean learners proficient in English participated in the experiments and the semantic factor and the locality factor were manipulated in the materials. The first experiment showed that there was no difference of the processing difficulty between object relative clauses and subject relative clauses with plausible sentential subjects. The second experiment showed that the processing difficulty of object relative clauses was greatly decreased when the sentential subject was inanimate. Additionally, it is noteworthy that the comprehension accuracy of subject relative clauses is lower than object relative clauses'. These results suggest that both of the semantic factor and working memory influence the processing and comprehension in relative clauses
참고문헌 (30)
- 이진희, "한국인 학습자들의 영어 장거리 wh-의존성 처리 메카니즘에 관한 연구", 언어과학, 25(4), pp.61~82 (2018), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
- Boland, J. E., "Verb Argument Structure in Parsing and Interpretation : Evidence from Wh-questions", Journal of Memory and Language, 34, pp.774~806 (1995)
- Clifton. C., "Linguistic Structure in Language Processing", pp.273~317 (1989), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Fedorenko, E., "The Nature of Working Memory Capacity in Sentence Comprehension : Evidence against Domain-specific Working Memory Resources", Journal of Memory and Language, 54, pp.541~553 (2006)
- Fedorenko, E., "Direct Evidence of Memory Retrieval as a Source of Difficulty in Non-local Dependencies in Language", Cognitive Science, 37(2), pp.378~394 (2013)
- Frazier, L, "Attention and Performance", pp.559~586 (1987), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Frazier, L., "Successive Cyclicity in the Grammar and the Parser", Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, pp.93~126 (1989)
- Frazier, L., "Construal" (1996), MIT press
- Frazier, L., "Making and Correcting Errors during Sentence Comprehension : Eye Movements in the Analysis of Structurally Ambiguous Sentences", Cognitive Psychology, 14, pp.178~210 (1982)
- Gennari, S. P., "Semantic Indeterminacy in Object Relative Clauses", Journal of Memory and Language, 58, pp.161~187 (2008)
- Gibson, E, "Linguistic Complexity : Locality of Syntactic Dependencies", Cognition, 68, pp.1~76 (1998)
- Gibson, E., "Image, Language, Brain", pp.95~126 (2000), MIT Press
- Gibson, E., "Reading Relative Clauses in English", Cognitive Linguistics, 16(2), pp.313~353 (2005)
- Gordon, P. C., "Effects of Noun Phrase Type on Sentence Complexity", Journal of Memory and Language, 51, pp.97~114 (2004)
- Grodner, D. J., "Consequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input for Sentential Complexity", Cognitive Science, 29, pp.261~291 (2005)
- Juffs, A., "Second Language Sentence Processing" (2015), Routledge
- Just, M. A., "A Capacity Theory of Comprehension : Individual Differences in Working Memory", Psychological Review, 99, pp.122~149 (1992)
- Konieczy, L, "Locality and Parsing Complexity", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(6), pp.627~645 (2000)
- Lewis, R, "A Theory of Grammatical but Unacceptable Embeddings", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, pp.93~116 (1996)
- Lewis, R., "Computational Principles of Working Memory in Sentence Comprehension", Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, pp.447~454 (2006)
- MacRae, K., "Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit(and Other Constraints)in On-line Sentence Comprehension", Journal of Memory and Language, 38, pp.283~312 (1998)
- Mak, W. M., "The Influence of Animacy on Relative Clause Processing", Journal of Memory and Language, 47, pp.50~68 (2002)
- Miller, G. A., "Handbook of Mathematical Psychology", pp.419~491 (1963), Wiley
- Ness, T., "Working Memory in the Processing of Long-distance Dependencies : Interference and Filler Maintenance", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(6), pp.1353~1365 (2017)
- Staub, A, "Eye Movements and Processing Difficulty in Object Relative Clauses", Cognition, 116, pp.71~86 (2010)
- Staub, A., "The Matrix Verb as a Source of Comprehension Difficulty in Object Relative Clauses", Cognitive Science, 41, pp.1353~1376 (2017)
- Sung, Y. T., "Processing Preference toward Object-extracted Relative Clauses in Mandarin Chinese by L1 and L2 Speakers : An Eye-tracking Study", Frontiers in Psychology, 7, pp.1~14 (2016)
- Traxler, M. J., "Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses : Evidence from Eye Movements", Journal of Memory and Language, 47, pp.69~90 (2002)
- Traxler, M. J., "Working Memory, Animacy and Verb Class in the Processing of Relative Clauses", Journal of Memory and Language, 53(2), pp.204~224 (2005)
- Trueswell, J. C., "Semantic Influence on Parsing : Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution", Journal of Memory and Language, 33, pp.285~318 (1994)