본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Word Order Paradox and PF effects of Traces

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The low adverb completely must be a sister of vP, but it precedes the auxiliary verb do in a vP-elided construction. The purpose of this squib is to provide a principled account for the word order paradox raised by the low adverb completely. I propose that the word order paradox arises from the PF effects of a trace, which in turn follows from the fact that the trace is a zero affix. This paper argues that the proposal sheds light, not only on the word order paradox, but also on puzzles like 'Why do some non-intervening traces display intervention effects?' and 'Why do some intervening traces show no intervention effects?'

Abstract

The low adverb completely must be a sister of vP, but it precedes the auxiliary verb do in a vP-elided construction. The purpose of this squib is to provide a principled account for the word order paradox raised by the low adverb completely. I propose that the word order paradox arises from the PF effects of a trace, which in turn follows from the fact that the trace is a zero affix. This paper argues that the proposal sheds light, not only on the word order paradox, but also on puzzles like 'Why do some non-intervening traces display intervention effects?' and 'Why do some intervening traces show no intervention effects?'

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Abels,Klaus, "Auxiliary Adverb Word Order Revisited", Proceedings of the 26th UPenn Colloquium on Linguistics, pp.1~15 (2003)
  2. Bobaljik,Jonathan, "What does adjacency do?", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 22, pp.1~32 (1994)
  3. Bobaljik,Jonathan, "Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection", 박사, pp.1995
  4. Bokovi?, ?eljko, "On the Distribution of Null Complementizers", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.527~541 (2003)
  5. Bresnan,Joan, "Variables in the theory of transformations. In Formal Syntax, ed. Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow and Adrain Akmajian" (1977), Academic Press
  6. Chomsky,Noam, "Syntactic structures" (1957), Mouton
  7. Chomsky,Noam, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
  8. Chomsky, Noam, "Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In Step by Step:Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. Roger Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
  9. Chomsky, Noam, "Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
  10. Chomsky, Noam, "Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MITWPL", ~ (2001)
  11. Culicover,Peter, "Evidence against ECP accounts of the that-t effect", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.557~561 (1993)
  12. Embick, David, "Movement operations after syntax", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.555~596 (2001)
  13. Fox, Danny, "in prep. Cyclic linearization and the typology of movement. ms. MIT", ~
  14. Halle, Morris, "Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. Kenneth Hale and S. Jay Keyser", pp.111~176 (1993), MIT Press
  15. Jackendoff,Ray, "Semantic interpretation in Generative Grammar" (1972), MIT Press
  16. Kayne,Richard S, "Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection", Studia Linguistica, 47, pp.3~31 (1993)
  17. Lasnik,Howard, "Minimalist analysis" (1999), Blackwell
  18. Lasnik, Howard, "Syntactic Structures revisited" (2000), MIT Press
  19. Lightfoot,David, "Trace theory and twice moved NPs", Linguistic Inquiry, 7(4), pp.559~582 (1976)
  20. Myers,Scott, "Zero-derivation and inflection", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 7, pp.53~69 (1984), MIT
  21. Pesetsky, David, "unpublished chapters of Zero syntax. (available at http:", linguistics, pp.www, pesetsky[DOI]
  22. Pesetsky,David, "Zero syntax" (1995), MIT Press
  23. Pesetsky, David, "T-to-C Movement: Causes and consequences. 쟅n Ken Hale: a life in Language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz" (2001), MIT Press
  24. Radford,Andrew, "English syntax" (2004), Cambridge Univ. Press
  25. Radford,Andrew, "Transformational syntax" (1981), Cambridge Univ. Press
  26. Roberts,Ian, "Have", Be raising, move F, and procrastinate, 1998, pp.29, 113~125
  27. Roussou,Anna, "C, T and the subject: that-t phenomena revisited", Lingua, pp.13~52 (2002)
  28. Szczegielniak,Adam, "'That-t' effects cross-linguistically and successive cyclic movement", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 33, pp.369~393 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)