Scope Interaction in English Small Clauses: Semantic Properties of Predicates, Restructuring, and Phases
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper we offer an explanation for the fact that small clauses with individual-level predicates and small clauses with stage-level predicates exhibit different scope patterns. We show that the two kinds of small clauses have different internal structures and restructuring possibilities, which are responsible for their different scope patterns. In our account, we assume (i) Cecchetto's (2004) rephrasing of the Phase Impenetrability Condition for movement such that each link of QR can cross at most one phase head and (ii) den Dikken's (2006b, 2007, 2008) proposal on QR that it is a once-only operation. Overt movement asymmetries between the two kinds of small clauses can also be explained in the proposed analysis.
Abstract
In this paper we offer an explanation for the fact that small clauses with individual-level predicates and small clauses with stage-level predicates exhibit different scope patterns. We show that the two kinds of small clauses have different internal structures and restructuring possibilities, which are responsible for their different scope patterns. In our account, we assume (i) Cecchetto's (2004) rephrasing of the Phase Impenetrability Condition for movement such that each link of QR can cross at most one phase head and (ii) den Dikken's (2006b, 2007, 2008) proposal on QR that it is a once-only operation. Overt movement asymmetries between the two kinds of small clauses can also be explained in the proposed analysis.
참고문헌 (38)
- Barwise, Jon, "Generalized quantifiers and natural language", Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, pp.159~219 (1981)
- Basilico,David, "The topic of small clauses", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.1~35 (2003)
- Bobaljik, Jonathan, "Long distance object agreement, restructuring, and anti-reconstruction", In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society Annual Meeting 33 (NELS 33),, pp.67~86 (2003), University of Massachusetts
- Bobaljik, Jonathan, "The domain of agreement", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23, pp.809~865 (2005)
- Bolinger,Dwight, "Essence and accident: English analogs of Hispanic ser-estar", In Issues in Linguistics: papers in honor of Henry and Renee Kahane, 58~69 (1973)
- Bowers,John, "The syntax of predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.591~656 (1993)
- Bruening,Benjamin, "QR obeys superiority: frozen scope and ACD", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.233~273 (2001)
- Campbell,Richard, "The temporal syntax of small clauses", Oakland University, ~ (1992)
- Carlson,Greg, "Reference to kinds in English", Garland, ~ (1980)
- Cecchetto,Carlo, "Explaining the locality conditions of QR: consequences for the theory of phases", Natural Language Semantics, 12, pp.345~397 (2004)
- Cho, Sungeun, "The configuration of non-verbal, non-nominal small clause Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: the framework,. In Step by step: essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: a life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Beyond explanatory adequacy", MIT, ~ (2001)
- Contreras,Heles, "Small clauses and complex predicates. In Small clauses", Small clauses, Syntax and Semantics, 28, pp.135~152 (1995), Academic Press.
- den Dikken, Marcel, "Relators and linkers: the syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas" (2006), MIT Press
- den Dikken, Marcel, "Phase extension: contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction", CUNY Graduate Center, ~ (2006)
- den Dikken,Marcel, "Phase extension: a reply", Theoretical Linguistics, 33, pp.1~41 (2007)
- den Dikken,Marcel, "Small clauses, phases, and phase extension: the case of scope and object shift", CUNY Graduate Center, ~ (2008)
- Erteschik-Shir,Naomi, "The dynamics of focus structure" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Felser,Claudia, "Perception and control: a minimalist analysis of English direct perception complements", Journal of Linguistics, 34, pp.351~386 (1998)
- Fox,Danny, "Economy and semantic interpretation" (2000), MIT Press
- Heim, Irene, "Semantics in generative grammar" (1998), Blackwell
- Higginbotham,James, "The logic of perceptual reports: an existential alternative to situation semantics", The Journal of Philosophy, 80, pp.100~127 (1983)
- Hornstein,Norbert, "Logical form" (1995), Blackwell
- Hornstein, Nobert, "Infinitival complements of perception and causative verbs: a case study on agreement and intervention effects in English and European Portuguese", University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, pp.81~110 (2006)
- Kennedy,Christopher, "Antecedent-contained deletion and the syntax of quantification", Linguistic Inquiry, 28, pp.662~688 (1997)
- Kratzer,Angelika, "Stage level and individual level rpedicates. In The generic book", pp.125~175 (1995), University of Chicago Press
- Marušič', Franc, "On non-simultaneous phases", 박사, pp.2005
- May,Robert, "Logical form" (1985), MIT Press
- Miyamoto,Yoichi, "Secondary predicates and tense", 박사, pp.1994
- Park,Myung-Kwan, "Small clauses in English and the stage-level and individual-level predictae distinction", Studies in Generative Grammar, 22, pp.255~292 (1997)
- Pesetsky, David, "T-to-C: causes and consequences. In Ken Hale: a life in language" (2001), MIT Press
- Ramchand,Gillian, "Aspect and predication: the semantics of argument structure" (1997), Clarendon Press
- Rapaport,T.R, "Specificity, objects and nominal small clauses", Small clauses, Syntax and Semantics, 28, pp.153~177 (1995), Academic Press
- Raposo, Edurado, "Two types of small clause", Small clauses, Syntax and Semantics, 28, pp.179~206 (1995), Academic Press
- Stowell,Tim, "Small clause restructuring. In Principles and parameters in comparative grammar", pp.182~218 (1991), MIT Press
- Svenonius,Peter, "Want-type and consider-type verbs", University of California, ~ (1993)
- Williams,Edwin, "Against small clauses", Linguistic Inquiry, 14, pp.287~308 (1983)