Reanalysis of Locality and Optional Movement in the Survive Framework
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper accounts for the locality in Korean language and the nature of optional movement in the Survive framework of minimalist syntax (Stroik 2009). I show how a Merge and Remerge analysis, induced by bottom‐up repelling processes, can explain the diverse forms of Whconstructions and scrambling in Korean, and how it sheds valuable light on our understanding of optional movements. Optional movement has properties very different from the last-resort type. In accordance with Stroik and Yang(2009), I support a non‐representational /nondeterministic derivational theory by showing further evidence from Korean scrambling and Wh‐constructions. I suggest interpreting the Survive principle as the syntactic instance of a more general push‐up mechanism that is responsible for inducing optional movements in general. I also propose a bottom‐up structure‐building Merge operation called “The Extended Survive Principle (ESP).” I postulate in line with Miyagawa (2010) that optional movement processes are not Agree-free nor Merge-free processes and argue that optional movement also requires feature-checking processes like obligatory movement. In this paper, I manipulate optionality in movement not in terms of optional versus obligatory Internal Merge but in terms of the “determination” of Remerge processes under the Survive framework, which employs a bottom-up repelling mechanism.
Abstract
This paper accounts for the locality in Korean language and the nature of optional movement in the Survive framework of minimalist syntax (Stroik 2009). I show how a Merge and Remerge analysis, induced by bottom‐up repelling processes, can explain the diverse forms of Whconstructions and scrambling in Korean, and how it sheds valuable light on our understanding of optional movements. Optional movement has properties very different from the last-resort type. In accordance with Stroik and Yang(2009), I support a non‐representational /nondeterministic derivational theory by showing further evidence from Korean scrambling and Wh‐constructions. I suggest interpreting the Survive principle as the syntactic instance of a more general push‐up mechanism that is responsible for inducing optional movements in general. I also propose a bottom‐up structure‐building Merge operation called “The Extended Survive Principle (ESP).” I postulate in line with Miyagawa (2010) that optional movement processes are not Agree-free nor Merge-free processes and argue that optional movement also requires feature-checking processes like obligatory movement. In this paper, I manipulate optionality in movement not in terms of optional versus obligatory Internal Merge but in terms of the “determination” of Remerge processes under the Survive framework, which employs a bottom-up repelling mechanism.
참고문헌 (32)
- Boeckx,Cedric, "Islands and chains" (2003), John Benjamins
- Bošković,Željko, "On Multiple Wh‐fronting", Linguistic Inquiry, 33, pp.351~383 (1999)
- Broday,Michael, "Mirror Theory: Syntactic representation in perfect syntax", LI, 31, pp.29~56 (2000)
- Brody,Michael, "On the status of representations and derivations In Derivations and Explanation in the Minimalist Program", pp.19~41 (2002), Blackwell
- Chomsky,N, "Bare phrase structure In Government and Binding and the Minimalist Program" (1994), Blackwell
- Chomsky,N, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky,N, "Minimalist Inquiries: The framework", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky,N, "Derivation by Phase In Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky,N, "Three factors in language design", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.1~22 (2005)
- Fukui,Naoki, "Parameters and optionality", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.399~420 (1993)
- Fox,Danny, "Economy and Semantic Interpretation" (2010), MIT Press
- Frampton,J, "Expletive insertion In The Role of Economy in Linguistic Theory" (1997), Akademie Verlag
- Hornstein,Norbert, "A Theory of Syntax" (2009), Blackwell
- Kim, Jung‐Ho, "Scrambling effects on the processing of Japanese sentences: an fMRI study", Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, pp.151~166 (2009), Elsevier
- Ko,Heejung, "Asymmetries in Scrambling and Cyclic Linearization", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.49~83 (2007)
- Koizumi, Masatoshi, "Cognitive processing of Japanese sentences with ditransitive verbs", Gengo Kenkyu, 125, pp.173~190 (2004)
- 이혜란, "A Study on Scrambling in Korean: The Minimalist Approach", 생성문법연구, 16(3), pp.425~460 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
- Miyagawa,Shigeru, "The EPP, scrambling, and wh-in-situ In Ken Hale: A life inlanguage" (2001), MIT Press
- Miyagawa,Shigeru, "A-movement scrambling and options without optionality In Word order and scrambling", pp.177~200 (2003), Blackwell
- Miyagawa,Shigeru, "Why Agree? Why Move?: Unifying Agreement‐Based and Discourse‐Configurational Languages" (2010), MIT Press
- O’Grady,Willliam, "Syntactic Carpentary" (2005), Erlbaum
- Pesetsky,David, "Phrasal movement and its kin" (2000), MIT Press
- Saito, Mamoru, "Scrambling as semantically vacuous A'-movement In Alternative conceptions in phrase structure", pp.182~200 (1989), University of Chicago Press
- Saito, Mamoru, "Long-distance scrambling in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.69~118 (1992)
- Saito,Mamoru, "A derivational approach to the interpretation of scrambling chains", Lingua, 113, pp.482~518 (2003)
- Sprouse,Jon, "The differential Sensitivity of Acceptability Judgments to Processing Effects", LI, 39, pp.686~693 (2008)
- Stroik,Thomas, "The Survive Principle", Linguistic Analysis, 29, pp.278~303 (1999)
- Stroik,Thomas, "Locality in Minimalist Syntax" (2009), MIT Press
- Takano Yuji, "Scrambling and Control", Linguistic Inquiry, 41, pp.83~110 (2010), The MIT Press
- Tamaoka, Katsuo, "Priority information used for the processing of Japanese sentences: Thematic roles, case particles or grammatical functions", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, pp.273~324 (2005)
- Yang,D‐W, "A Non‐deterministic Theory of Movement", Proceedings of the 2010 Seoul International Conference on Linguistics (2009)
- Yang,D‐W, "The Determinism Fallacy: Ambiguity of Interpretive Effects", Language Research, ~ (2010)