본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

오슨 웰즈의 「맥베스」에 대한 재평가

A Re-evaluation of Orson Welles' Macbeth

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Orson Welles’ Macbeth has been undeservedly undervalued since it was released in 1948. In general, there are three kinds of criticisms against this film such as the following: it is a simple morality tale in which good wins over evil; it consists of two-dimensional flat characters who, being either good or bad, lack psychological depth; and it is a quickly made low-grade movie with cheap sets and costumes. This paper argues that Welles’ Macbeth interprets Shakespeare’s play as showing the triumph of evil over good along with the vicious circle of power struggle on earth. This movie also regards Macbeth as the prototype of such 20th-century dictators like Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin and warns against the unending reappearance of such evildoers on earth. This movie also presents the fatalistic view that every human-being is at the mercy of the supernatural powers of evil. Welles’ movie also creates morally ambivalent three-dimensional characters who are both good and evil in nature. These complex characters display extreme psychological anguishes as well. This movie does not show elaborate periodical details or spectacular scenes due to budget constraint. However, it delivers its messages successfully as well as portrays its characters impressively by using various expressionistic or symbolic devices in sets, costumes, properties, photography, lighting, and sound. This movie also heightens its dramatic effects by adopting theatrical devices to the maximum effect. When producing Shakespearean films, a huge budget does not always guarantee a great movie in both content and form. In his Macbeth, Welles proves that even with a minimum budget one can make an excellent film showing significant messages, dynamic characters, and outstanding artistic skills.

Abstract

Orson Welles’ Macbeth has been undeservedly undervalued since it was released in 1948. In general, there are three kinds of criticisms against this film such as the following: it is a simple morality tale in which good wins over evil; it consists of two-dimensional flat characters who, being either good or bad, lack psychological depth; and it is a quickly made low-grade movie with cheap sets and costumes. This paper argues that Welles’ Macbeth interprets Shakespeare’s play as showing the triumph of evil over good along with the vicious circle of power struggle on earth. This movie also regards Macbeth as the prototype of such 20th-century dictators like Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin and warns against the unending reappearance of such evildoers on earth. This movie also presents the fatalistic view that every human-being is at the mercy of the supernatural powers of evil. Welles’ movie also creates morally ambivalent three-dimensional characters who are both good and evil in nature. These complex characters display extreme psychological anguishes as well. This movie does not show elaborate periodical details or spectacular scenes due to budget constraint. However, it delivers its messages successfully as well as portrays its characters impressively by using various expressionistic or symbolic devices in sets, costumes, properties, photography, lighting, and sound. This movie also heightens its dramatic effects by adopting theatrical devices to the maximum effect. When producing Shakespearean films, a huge budget does not always guarantee a great movie in both content and form. In his Macbeth, Welles proves that even with a minimum budget one can make an excellent film showing significant messages, dynamic characters, and outstanding artistic skills.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 강석주, "『맥베스』영상화에 따른 시각의 차이: 오손 웰스의 <맥베스>와 로만 폴란스키의 <맥베스>", Shakespeare Review, 43(1), pp.5~28 (2007), 한국셰익스피어학회
  2. Callow,Simon, "Orson Welles: The Road to Xanadu" (1995), Jonathan Cape
  3. Cobos, Juan, "Welles and Falstaff", Sight and Sound, 35, pp.160~ (1966)
  4. Collick, John, "Symbolism in Shakespeare Film, In Shakespeare on Film: Contemporary Critical Essays", pp.83~102 (1998), St. Martin
  5. Harris, Suzanne, "Macbeth, In Shakespeare in Performance", pp.125~129 (1995), Salamander Books
  6. Jorgens, Jack J, "Realising Shakespeare on Film, In Shakespeare on Film: Contemporary Critical Essays", pp.18~42 (1998), Macmillan
  7. Julius Caesar, "Mercury Theatre", ~ (1937)
  8. Leaming,Barbara, "Orson Welles: A Biography" (1985), Viking Press
  9. Lindley, Arthur, "Scotland Saved from History: Welles’s Macbeth and the Ahistoricism of Medieval Film, In Shakespeare into Film", pp.141~145 (2002), Checkmark Books
  10. Macbeth, "Republic Pictures", ~ (1948)
  11. Macbeth, "Lafayette Theater", ~ (1936)
  12. Mason, Pamela, "Orson Welles and Filmed Shakespeare, In The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film", pp.183~198 (2000), Cambridge UP
  13. Reynolds, Bryan, "Performing Transversally: Reimagining Shakespeare and the Critical Future" (2003), Palgrave Macmillan
  14. Rothwell, Kenneth S, "A History of Shakespeare on Screen: A Century of Film and Television" (2004), Cambridge UP
  15. Shakespeare, William, "King Lear" (1989), Routledge
  16. Shakespeare, William, "Macbeth" (1977), Methue
  17. Welsh, James M, "Shakespeare into Film" (2002), Checkmark Books

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)