한국어의 3인칭 지시 표현 ‘그’에 관한 소고
0
조회
0
다운로드
23
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The article argues that a 3rd person referring expression ku in Korean is not a pronoun, but a nominal phrase which consists of a demonstrative ku and a null category pro having a feature [+human]. We first point out that 3rd person ku differs from a 3rd person pronoun he in English in six ways although it can be coreferential with an antecedent in a discourse: (a) non-occurrence of 3rd person ku in colloquial Korean along with its limited distribution in written Korean, (b) no deictic function with finger pointing, (c) no application of Binding Principle B, (d) no application of Binding Principle C, (e) word order effect, (f)unavailability of a variable binding interpretation. We then claim that all these differences cannot be accounted for in terms of a parametric difference between Korean and English and argue that they can be accounted for if it is assumed that 3rd person ku consists of a demonstrative ku and a null category pro having a feature [+human]. We also provide independent pieces of evidence for the postulations of a demonstrative ku and pro. Finally we discuss some implications of the claims in the article for a Korean pronominal system.
Abstract
The article argues that a 3rd person referring expression ku in Korean is not a pronoun, but a nominal phrase which consists of a demonstrative ku and a null category pro having a feature [+human]. We first point out that 3rd person ku differs from a 3rd person pronoun he in English in six ways although it can be coreferential with an antecedent in a discourse: (a) non-occurrence of 3rd person ku in colloquial Korean along with its limited distribution in written Korean, (b) no deictic function with finger pointing, (c) no application of Binding Principle B, (d) no application of Binding Principle C, (e) word order effect, (f)unavailability of a variable binding interpretation. We then claim that all these differences cannot be accounted for in terms of a parametric difference between Korean and English and argue that they can be accounted for if it is assumed that 3rd person ku consists of a demonstrative ku and a null category pro having a feature [+human]. We also provide independent pieces of evidence for the postulations of a demonstrative ku and pro. Finally we discuss some implications of the claims in the article for a Korean pronominal system.
참고문헌 (43)
- 김경석, "국어 3인칭 대명사 '그' : 프랑스어·영어와 비교연구", 프랑스어문교육, (34), pp.101~121 (2010), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
- 박진호, "유형론적 관점에서 본 한국어 대명사 체계의 특징", 國語學, (50), pp.115~147 (2007), 국어학회
- 심봉섭, "‘그’, celui-ci, il의 비교 연구", 생성 문법 연구, 3, pp.221~243 (1993)
- 안소진, "소위 3인칭 대명사 '그, 그녀'의 기능에 대하여", 한국어학, 38, pp.145~164 (2008), 한국어학회
- 양동휘, "확대 결속 이론", 한글, 188, pp.147~195 (1985)
- 양동휘, "한국어의 대용화" (1988), 한국연구원
- 양명희, "국어 대용어의 특성과 기능", 국어학, 24, pp.259~289 (1994)
- 이익섭, "국어문법론강의" (1999), 학연사
- 임홍빈, "국어의 재귀사 연구" (1987), 신구 문화사
- 임홍빈, "구조적 평행성과 국어의 대명사", 제 5 회 국제학술회의 세계한국학대회 논문집:한국학의 과제와 전망 I (기조 연설 역사 어문편), pp.549~612 (1998), 한국정신문화연구원
- 장경희, "지시어 ‘이’, ‘그’, ‘저’의 의미 분석", 어학연구, 16(2), pp.167~184 (1980)
- 장석진, "Deixis의 생성적 고찰", 어학연구, 8(2), pp.26~43 (1972)
- 최기용, "한국어의 부정극어 ‘아무’에 대하여", 생성 문법 연구, 8, pp.313~342 (1998)
- 최기용, "한국어 격과 조사의 생성통사론" (2009), 한국문화사
- Borer, Hagit, "Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romances languages" (1984), Foris
- Chien, Yu-Chin, "Children's knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for modularity of syntax and pragmatics", Language Acquisition, 1, pp.225~295 (1990)
- Cho, Sook Whan, "Ku, kyay, and anti-logophoricity in Korean", Language Research, 25, pp.255~275 (1989)
- Chomsky, Noam, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Elbourne, Paul, "The interpretation of pronouns", Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, pp.119~150 (2008)
- Evans, Gareth, "Pronouns", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, pp.337~362 (1980)
- Han, Chung-hye, "V-raising and grammar competition in Korean: Evidence from negation and quantifier scope", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.1~48 (2007)
- Hoji, Hajime, "On the so-called overt pronouns in Japanese and Korean", In Papers from the seventh international conference on Korean linguistics, pp.61~78 (1990), Osaka International Circle of Korean linguistics & Osaka University of Economics and Law
- Hoji, Hajime, "Kare, In Interdisciplinary approaches to language: In honor of Professor S.-Y. Kuroda", pp.287~304 (1991), Reidel
- Hong, Sung-Shim, "Some constraints on pronominal binding", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 11, pp.75~98 (1986)
- Kang, Beom-Mo, "Unbounded reflexives", Linguistics and Philosophy, 11, pp.415~456 (1988)
- Kang, Myung-Yoon, "Topics in Korean syntax: Phrase structure, variable binding and movement", 박사, pp.1988
- Kim, Sun-Hee, "Division of labor between grammar and pragmatics: The distribution and interpretation of anaphora" (1994), Taehaksa
- 김선희, "A Pragmatic Alternative to Syntactic Accounts of Anaphora", 담화와 인지, 10(3), pp.75~107 (2003), 담화·인지언어학회
- Lasnik, Howard, "Remarks on coreference", Linguistic Analysis, 2, pp.1~22 (1976)
- Lasnik, Howard, "On the necessity of binding conditions In Essays on anaphora", pp.149~167 (1991), Kluwer
- Pronouns and non-coreference, "Lasnik, Howard", University of Maryland, 214~227, pp.In University of Maryland working papers in linguistics, vol. 13 (2004)
- Lee, Gunsoo, "On bound pronouns and anaphors", Studies in Generative Grammar, 11, pp.151~166 (2001)
- Lee, Hong-Bae, "Notes on pronouns, reflexives, and pronominalization", Language Research, 12, pp.253~265 (1976)
- Lee, Hong-Bae, "On binding condition of pronominals", Linguistic Journal of Korea, 8, pp.33~48 (1983)
- Lee, Ik-Hwan, "Pronominal anaphora in Korean", Language Research, 14, pp.63~99 (1978)
- 오은정, "On Korean Children's Knowledge of Principle B", 언어, 37(4), pp.907~928 (2012), 한국언어학회
- 박명관, "Structurally Ambiguous Empty Nominal Pro-forms in Korean", 언어, 37(4), pp.825~843 (2012), 한국언어학회
- Pesetsky, David, "Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding, In The representation of (in)definiteness", pp.98~129 (1987), MIT Press
- Reinhart, Tanya, "Coreference and bound anaphora: A restatement of the anaphora question", Linguistics and Philosophy, 6, pp.47~88 (1983)
- Rizzi, Luigi, "Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.501~558 (1986)
- Saito, Mamoru, "Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications", 박사, pp.1985
- Sportiche, Dominique, "Binding theory-Structure sensitivity of referential dependencies", Lingua, 130, pp.187~208 (2013)
- Suh, Jinhee, "Scope phenomena and aspects of Korean syntax", 박사, pp.1990