두 사촌 귀족에서 좌절과 상충의 생성 역학
Frustration and the Creative Dynamics of the Contrary in The Two Noble Kinsmen
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay explores the widespread sense of frustration represented by a broad range of opposing images within The Two Noble Kinsmen and attempts to interpret how repeated human will to overcome it sets up an atmosphere of new creative dynamics. Such a sense of frustration dominates the entire play. At the beginning, the hymen is full of contrary images that possibly taint the symbolic meaning of marriage as new life. When the three queens of Thebes appear onstage to appeal to Theseus, thereby interrupting his marriage to Hippolyta, that sense realizes as a solid fact within the domain of the play. In the scenes that follow, main characters reveal their wills and desires that are to be frustrated by an incomprehensible power of reality. Arcite and Palamon wish to escape from Thebes, detesting its corruption, but the imminent war saps their will. The Jailor’s Daughter feels entirely frustrated due to the unrewarded love from Palamon and Emilia cannot uphold her faith in chastity when she becomes the main prize for the tournament in which Arcite and Palamon fight for their beloved lady. Under the duress of all this vexation, Arcite, Palamon, the Jailor’s Daughter and even Emilia become mad, or reach near a state of madness in the course of their desperate attempts to overcome the power of forces beyond their control. Their respective endeavors ultimately generate a circular structure in which they mirror each other. Such circularity manifests the reality that repeats and differs with its singularity. The reality is also an arena of clashing, fighting and coexisting contrarieties that cannot be grasped by reason alone. Indeed, it is a world of reason and unreason, of life and death, and of tragedy and comedy. In such a chaotic coexistence of opposing elements, the creative dynamics appear as the primary propelling force in the play, in the same manner the two playwrights exhibited their artistic rivalry.
Abstract
This essay explores the widespread sense of frustration represented by a broad range of opposing images within The Two Noble Kinsmen and attempts to interpret how repeated human will to overcome it sets up an atmosphere of new creative dynamics. Such a sense of frustration dominates the entire play. At the beginning, the hymen is full of contrary images that possibly taint the symbolic meaning of marriage as new life. When the three queens of Thebes appear onstage to appeal to Theseus, thereby interrupting his marriage to Hippolyta, that sense realizes as a solid fact within the domain of the play. In the scenes that follow, main characters reveal their wills and desires that are to be frustrated by an incomprehensible power of reality. Arcite and Palamon wish to escape from Thebes, detesting its corruption, but the imminent war saps their will. The Jailor’s Daughter feels entirely frustrated due to the unrewarded love from Palamon and Emilia cannot uphold her faith in chastity when she becomes the main prize for the tournament in which Arcite and Palamon fight for their beloved lady. Under the duress of all this vexation, Arcite, Palamon, the Jailor’s Daughter and even Emilia become mad, or reach near a state of madness in the course of their desperate attempts to overcome the power of forces beyond their control. Their respective endeavors ultimately generate a circular structure in which they mirror each other. Such circularity manifests the reality that repeats and differs with its singularity. The reality is also an arena of clashing, fighting and coexisting contrarieties that cannot be grasped by reason alone. Indeed, it is a world of reason and unreason, of life and death, and of tragedy and comedy. In such a chaotic coexistence of opposing elements, the creative dynamics appear as the primary propelling force in the play, in the same manner the two playwrights exhibited their artistic rivalry.
참고문헌 (16)
- Berggren, Paula S., "‘For what we lack,", We laugh’: Incompletion and The Two Noble Kinsmen, 1984, pp.14(4), 3~17
- Blincoe, Noel R., "The Analoguous Qualities of The Two Noble Kinsmen and Masque of the Inner Temple and Gray’s Inn", Notes and Queries, 43(2), pp.168~171 (1996)
- Bloom, Harold, "Shakespeare : The Invention of the Human" (1998), Riverhead Books
- Davis, Alex, "Living in the Past: Thebes, Periodization and The Two Noble Kinsmen", Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 40(1), pp.173~195 (2010)
- Delahoyde, Michael, "Edward de Vere and The Two Noble Kinsmen", The Oxfordian, 25, pp.117~148 (2013)
- DeWall, Nichole, "‘Like a shadow,", I’ll ever dwell’: The Jailer’s Daughter as Ariadne in The Two Noble Kinsmen, 2013, pp.46, 15~26
- Hedrick, Donald K., "Shakespeare, Fletcher and The Two Noble Kinsmen" (1989), Missouri UP
- Garber, Marjorie, "Shakespeare After All" (2004), Pantheon Books
- Kellermann, Daniela, "Love and Madness in Renaissance Trigicomedies — The Two Noble Kinsmen and The Winter’s Tale", Gender Forum, 45 (2013)
- Lief, Madelon, "Linguistic Subversion and the Artifice of Rhetoric in The Two Noble Kinsmen", Shakespeare Quarterly, 38(4), pp.405~425 (1987)
- Potter, Lois, "The Arden Shakespeare: The Two Noble Kinsmen" (1997), Methuen
- Shannon, Laurie J., "Emilia’s Argument: Friendship and ‘Human Title’ in The Two Noble Kinsmen", ELH, 64(3), pp.657~682 (1997)
- Sprang, Felix C. H., "Never Fortune Did Play a Subtler Game: The Creation of ‘Medieval’ Narratives in Pericles and The Two Noble Kinsmen", European Journal of English Studies, 15(2), pp.115~128 (2011)
- "Ethics" (1997)[URL]
- Turner, Robert Kean, "The New Cambridge Shakespeare: The Two Noble Kinsmen" (2012), Cambridge UP
- Wells, Stanley, "Shakespeare : A Life in Drama" (1997), Norton
