본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유사수문구문의 부정섬효과

Negative Island Effects in Sluicing-like Constructions

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The structure of Korean sluicing-like constructions corresponds to that of the cleft constructions which contain no islands. In sluicing-like constructions, however, the negative island-sensitivity emerges clause-mately when the low wh-adjuncts such as ettehkhey ‘how’ appear with negation induced by island-violating movement in LF. The NPI or Neg is a scope limiting element which restricts wh-feature movement within its own scope. At this point, what gets the acceptability improved in such contexts is caused by the role of modality in C or discourse effects of the low wh-adjuncts. Modality in C or discourse effect of the low wh-adjuncts leads to immunity to syntactic constraints involved in intervention effects or negative island effects. The auxiliary verb can move to C across the interveners such as NPI or Neg. The wh-feature has a free ride prior to Spell-out and is checked against the uninterpretable wh-feature in C. The derivation is OK when the uninterpretable wh-feature in C is deleted by the Spec-head agreement. A tendency for a topic-marked phrase to override intervention effects or negative island effects lies in such a free ride. This argument is supported by the empirical data such as nun-marked low wh-adjuncts. This is the reason why the merger-type sluicing-like constructions are free from such effects.

Abstract

The structure of Korean sluicing-like constructions corresponds to that of the cleft constructions which contain no islands. In sluicing-like constructions, however, the negative island-sensitivity emerges clause-mately when the low wh-adjuncts such as ettehkhey ‘how’ appear with negation induced by island-violating movement in LF. The NPI or Neg is a scope limiting element which restricts wh-feature movement within its own scope. At this point, what gets the acceptability improved in such contexts is caused by the role of modality in C or discourse effects of the low wh-adjuncts. Modality in C or discourse effect of the low wh-adjuncts leads to immunity to syntactic constraints involved in intervention effects or negative island effects. The auxiliary verb can move to C across the interveners such as NPI or Neg. The wh-feature has a free ride prior to Spell-out and is checked against the uninterpretable wh-feature in C. The derivation is OK when the uninterpretable wh-feature in C is deleted by the Spec-head agreement. A tendency for a topic-marked phrase to override intervention effects or negative island effects lies in such a free ride. This argument is supported by the empirical data such as nun-marked low wh-adjuncts. This is the reason why the merger-type sluicing-like constructions are free from such effects.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Beck, Sigrid, "On wh-and operator scope in Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 6(4), pp.339~384 (1997)
  2. 최영식, "Locality in So Called Sluicing in Korean: Null Argument and Beyond", 언어연구, 31(2), pp.497~518 (2015), 한국현대언어학회[DOI]
  3. Chomsky, Noam, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
  4. van Craenenbroek, Jeroen, "Ellipsis, identity, and accommodation:The case of case", Paper presented in Identity in Ellipsis Conference (2013), Leiden University
  5. Fernández-Sánchez, Jesús, "Language and Linguistic Compass", pp.1~39 (2010), Wiley and Sons Ltd
  6. Fujii, Tomohiro, "Japanese syntax in comparative perspective", pp.181~205 (2014), Oxford University Press
  7. Higgins, F. Roger, "The pseudo-cleft construction in English" (1979), Garland
  8. 홍용철, "“것” 분열 구문에서의 “것”의 유정성", 생성문법연구, 27(3), pp.713~731 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  9. Huang, James, "Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar", pp.1982
  10. Huang, James, "Move wh in a language without wh-movement", Linguistic Review, 1(4), pp.369~416 (1982)
  11. Kim, Jeong-Seok, "Syntactic focus movement and ellipsis", pp.1997
  12. Kim, Jinkyoung, "Negation in Korean: A functional and discourse approach", pp.1996
  13. Kim, Okgi, "On the syntax of ‘why’-like ‘how’ in Korean", Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 6(1), pp.788~796 (2021)
  14. in the overt syntax, "Natural Language and Linguistic Theory", 2005, 867~916
  15. Kuno, Susumu, "Remarks on negation", Paper Presented at the 4th SICOL (1997)
  16. Kuno, Susumu, "Description and explanation in Korean linguistics", pp.87~131 (1998), East Asian Program, Cornell University
  17. Lasnik, Howard, "When can you save a structure by destroying it? In Minjoo Kim and Uri Strauss", Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the North East Linguistic Society, pp.301~320 (2001)
  18. Lee, Doo-Won, "Remarks on negative island in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 8, pp.457~471 (1999)
  19. 이두원, "Vocative Head Attached to Fragments and Echo Wh-words", 영어영문학, 19(3), pp.367~390 (2014), 미래영어영문학회
  20. 이두원, "Pseudo Noun Incorporation in Korean Object-verb Idioms: With Reference to Case Drop and Low Scope", 영어영문학연구, 60(4), pp.283~301 (2018), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
  21. 이두원, "Syntactic Patterns of Dative or Locative Experiencers and Goals", 영어영문학연구, 61(3), pp.291~314 (2019), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
  22. 이두원, "문제중심학습의 영어구문법 교육: 강의와 학생 팀별 학습에 대한 실험 연구", 영어영문학연구, 62(2), pp.233~256 (2020), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
  23. 이두원, "한국어의 의문사 조각구문과 유사수문구문", 언어과학연구, (98), pp.353~377 (2021), 언어과학회
  24. 이숙희, "한국어 유사 수문구문에 대한 재고", 생성문법연구, 29(1), pp.97~121 (2019), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  25. 이숙희, "한국어 sprouting 유형 유사수문구문의 분열구조 분석", 생성문법연구, 30(1), pp.115~132 (2020), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  26. 이숙희, "한국어 유사수문구문의 두 가지 구조와 특정성", 생성문법연구, 31(1), pp.107~128 (2021), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  27. Merchant, Jason, "The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
  28. Merchant, Jason, "Fragments and ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, pp.661~738 (2004)
  29. 박소영, "한국어 수문문에 대한 분열문 분석 재고", 언어학, (71), pp.113~138 (2015), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
  30. Pesetsky, David, "Phrasal movement and its kin" (2000), MIT Press
  31. Pinkham, Jessie, "Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society", pp.429~450 (1975), Chicago Linguistics Society
  32. Rizzi, Luizi, "Relativized minimality" (1990), MIT Press
  33. Ross, John Robert, "Constraints on variables in syntax", pp.1967
  34. Ross, John Robert, "CLS 5:Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Sociery", pp.252~286 (1969), Chicago Linguistic Society
  35. Shlonsky, Ur, "Where’s ‘why’?", Linguistic Inquiry, 42(4), pp.651~669 (2011)
  36. Tancredi, Christopher, "Not only even, but even only", Ms, pp.1990
  37. Thomas, Linda, "Beginning syntax" (2001), Blackwell
  38. Tsai, W. Dylan, "On economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies", pp.1994
  39. Tsai, W. Dylan, "On nominal islands and LF extraction in Chinese", Natural Language and Linguistcis Theory, 12(1), pp.121~175 (1994)
  40. Tsai, W. Dylan, "Left periphery and how-why alternations", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 17, pp.83~115 (2008)
  41. Vincente, Luis, "Sluicing and its subtypes", Ms, pp.2014
  42. 여승주, "On the -key toy-construction as Implicit Causatives", 언어학 연구, (51), pp.49~68 (2019), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
  43. Yim, Changguk, "Fragment answers containing -yo in Korean:New evidence for the PF deletion theory of ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 43(3), pp.514~518 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)