본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Compositional Semantic Analysis of Plurality and Distributivity

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper discusses a recent analysis of distributivity proposed by de Vries (2017), which assumes that quantificational distributivity (D-operator based distributivity) and lexical distributivity should exist together in the semantic system. Specifically, de Vries argues that the interpretive pattern of group noun constructions is explained by a lexical approach assuming that their interpretations can be captured using pseudo-equivalences, with a pragmatic factor implemented in the framework. This paper points out that there are group noun constructions in Korean whose interpretive pattern cannot be easily explained by such a lexical analysis, and suggests an alternative, structural analysis to derive the available interpretations. The proposed analysis assumes that distributivity of the group noun constructions is based on the presence of a D-operator at LF and its interactions with other arguments in the sentence, and shows that it has an advantage over a lexical analysis in that it can adequately capture the puzzling interpretations in a compositional manner.

Abstract

This paper discusses a recent analysis of distributivity proposed by de Vries (2017), which assumes that quantificational distributivity (D-operator based distributivity) and lexical distributivity should exist together in the semantic system. Specifically, de Vries argues that the interpretive pattern of group noun constructions is explained by a lexical approach assuming that their interpretations can be captured using pseudo-equivalences, with a pragmatic factor implemented in the framework. This paper points out that there are group noun constructions in Korean whose interpretive pattern cannot be easily explained by such a lexical analysis, and suggests an alternative, structural analysis to derive the available interpretations. The proposed analysis assumes that distributivity of the group noun constructions is based on the presence of a D-operator at LF and its interactions with other arguments in the sentence, and shows that it has an advantage over a lexical analysis in that it can adequately capture the puzzling interpretations in a compositional manner.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Barker, Chris, "Group terms in English: Representing groups as atoms", Journal of Semantics, 9(1), pp.69~93 (1992)
  2. Bennett, Michael, "Some extensions of a Montague fragment of English", PhD, pp.1974
  3. Brisson, Christine, "Distributivity, Maximality, and Floating Quantifiers", PhD, pp.1998
  4. Champollion, Lucas, "Parts of a whole: Distributivity as a bridge between aspect and measurement", PhD, pp.2010
  5. Chierchia, Gennaro, "Reference to kinds across language", Natural Language Semantics, 6(1), pp.339~405 (1998)
  6. Choe, Jae-Woong, "Anti-Quantifiers and a Theory of Distributivity", PhD, pp.1987
  7. de Vries, Hanna, "Two kinds of distributivity", Natural Language Semantics, 25(2), pp.173~197 (2017)
  8. Heim, Irene, "Semantics in Generative Grammar" (1998), Blackwell Publishers
  9. Krifka, Manfred, "Lexical Matters", pp.29~53 (1992), Chicago University Press, CSLI Publications
  10. Krifka, Manfred, "Bare NPs: kind-referring, indefinites, both, or neither?", Proceedings of SALT, 13, pp.1~24 (2003), CLC Publications
  11. Landman, Frederick, "Groups", Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, pp.559~744 (1989)
  12. Landman, Frederick, "The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory", pp.425~457 (1996), Blackwell
  13. Lasersohn, Peter, "Plurality, Conjunction, and Events" (1995), Kluwer
  14. Link, Godehard, "Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language" (1983), Foris
  15. Link, Godehard, "Varieties of Formal Semantics", pp.245~257 (1984), Foris
  16. Magri, Giorgio, "Collective nouns without groups", Proceedings of IATL, 27, pp.183~202 (2012), MIT
  17. Sei-Rang Oh, "On the Semantics of Distance-Distributivity Markers", 생성문법연구, 16(2), pp.249~268 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
  18. 오세랑, "On the Semantics of kakkak and each", 현대영미어문학, 25(4), pp.235~254 (2007), 현대영미어문학회
  19. 오세랑, "A Compositional Semantic Analysis of Multiple Distributivity Marker Constructions", 언어과학, 15(3), pp.217~238 (2008), 한국언어과학회
  20. Roberts, Craige, "Modal subordination, anaphora, and distributivity", PhD, pp.1987
  21. Safir, Ken, "Binominal each", Proceedings of North Eastern Linguistic Society, 18, pp.426~450 (1988), GLSA
  22. Scha, Remko, "Formal methods in the study of language", pp.483~512 (1981), Mathematisch Centrum
  23. Schwarzschild, Roger, "Pluralities" (1996), Kluwer
  24. Winter, "Choice functions and the scopal semantics of indefinites", Linguistics and Philosophy, 20, pp.399~467 (1997)
  25. Winter, "Distributivity and dependency", Natural Language Semantics, 8, pp.27~69 (2000)
  26. Winter, Yoad, "Handbook of contemporary semantics", pp.77~113 (2015), Wiley

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)