본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Remarks on Licensing Multiple Gaps at LF

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

In this paper, I claim that multiple gaps like P-gaps and ATB-gaps are licensed in overt syntax. First I examine the challenges to the hypothesis of Engdahl(1983) that P-gaps are licensed in overt syntax, concluding that the challenging arguments are not valid or do not have much explanatory power. As for P-gaps, I review Kim&Lyle's(1996) suggestion of licensing P-gaps by LF reconstruction, Nissenbaum's(2000) proposal of the outer spec/inner adjunct configuration for licensing P-gaps in LF, and Kim&Lyle's(1996) and Kim's(2001) account for licensing P-gaps by the uniformity condition on chains applied in LF. As for ATB-gaps, I suggest that ATB-movement does not take place in LF in Korean, thereby showing that ATB-gaps are not licensed in LF. This is in the same line with Boskovic&Franks(2000), who argue that ATB-movement does not occur in LF in English. Then, I assume, partly supporting Kim(2001) that the uniformity condition on chain composition is a licensing mechanism for multiple gaps, which applies in overt syntax.

Abstract

In this paper, I claim that multiple gaps like P-gaps and ATB-gaps are licensed in overt syntax. First I examine the challenges to the hypothesis of Engdahl(1983) that P-gaps are licensed in overt syntax, concluding that the challenging arguments are not valid or do not have much explanatory power. As for P-gaps, I review Kim&Lyle's(1996) suggestion of licensing P-gaps by LF reconstruction, Nissenbaum's(2000) proposal of the outer spec/inner adjunct configuration for licensing P-gaps in LF, and Kim&Lyle's(1996) and Kim's(2001) account for licensing P-gaps by the uniformity condition on chains applied in LF. As for ATB-gaps, I suggest that ATB-movement does not take place in LF in Korean, thereby showing that ATB-gaps are not licensed in LF. This is in the same line with Boskovic&Franks(2000), who argue that ATB-movement does not occur in LF in English. Then, I assume, partly supporting Kim(2001) that the uniformity condition on chain composition is a licensing mechanism for multiple gaps, which applies in overt syntax.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. Boskovic, J, "Across-the-board movement and LF", Syntax, 3(2), pp.107~128 (2000)
  2. Bresnan,J, "Variables in the theory of transformations. In Formal syntax, ed. by P. Culicover & T. Wasow & A. Akmajian", pp.157~196 (1977), Academic Press
  3. Cho, S.-E, "The interpretations of wh-elements in conjoined wh-questions. Ms. MIT and SUNY at Stony Brook", ~ (2002)
  4. Chomsky,N, "Conditions on rules of grammar", Linguistic Analysis, 2, pp.303~351 (1976)
  5. Chomsky,N, "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
  6. Chomsky, N, "The theory of principles and parameters. In Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, ed. by J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld & T. Vennemann", pp.506~569 (1993), Walter de Gruyter
  7. Chung,D, "Why is HOW in Korean insensitive to islands?: A revised nominal analysis", Studies in Modern Grammar, 39, pp.115~131 (2005)
  8. Citko,B, "ATB wh-movement and the nature of merge", Proceedings of NELS 33 (2003)
  9. Citko,B, "On the nature of merge: external merge, internal merge, and parallel merge", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.475~496 (2005)
  10. Contreras,H, "A note on parasitic gaps", Linguistic Inquiry, 15, pp.704~713 (1984)
  11. Culicover,P.W, "Parasitic gaps: A history. In Parasitic gaps, ed. by P. W. Culicover & P. Postal", pp.3~68 (2001), MIT Press
  12. Dyla,S, "Across-the-board dependencies and case in Polish", Linguistic Inquiry, 15, pp.701~705 (1984)
  13. Engdahl,E, "Parasitic gaps", Linguistics and Philosophy, 6, pp.5~34 (1983)
  14. Fax,D, "Economy and semantic interpretation" (2000), MIT Press
  15. Fiengo, R, "Indices and identity" (1994), MIT Press
  16. Franks,S, "On parallelism in across-the-board dependencies", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.509~529 (1993)
  17. Goodall,G, "Parallel Structures in Syntax" (1987), Cambridge Univ. Press
  18. Hoji,H, "Logical Form Constraints and Configurational Structures in Japanese", 박사, pp.1985
  19. Kasai,H, "Two notes on ATB movement", Language and Linguistics, 5, pp.167~188 (2004)
  20. Kato, T, "Symmetries in Coordination", 박사, pp.2006
  21. Kennedy,C, "VP-deletion and "nonparasitic" gaps", Linguistic Inquiry, 28, pp.697~707 (1997)
  22. Kim,S.-W, "Chain composition and uniformity", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19, pp.67~107 (2001)
  23. Kim, S.-W, "Parasitic gaps, multiple questions, and VP ellipsis", Proceedings of the 14th WCCFL, pp.287~301 (1996)
  24. Lakoff, G, "Repartee. Foundations of Language 6", ~ (1970)
  25. Larson, R, "Antecedent containment or vacuous movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.103~122 (1990)
  26. Lasnik,H, "Analysis of Negation in English", 박사, pp.1972
  27. Lasnik,H, "When can you save a structure by destroying it?", In Proceedings of the NELS 31.2, pp.301~320 (2001)
  28. Lasnik, H, "Class notes at LSA Summer Institute. Harvard Univ. & MIT", ~ (2005)
  29. Lasnik, H, "A course in GB syntax" (1988), MIT Press
  30. Lee,E, "ECP and subjacency in LF and hierarchical order of wh-adjuncts", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 2, pp.93~103 (1987)
  31. Lee, E, "Identification of across-the-board gaps in Korean", Studies in Generative Grammar, 17, pp.315~336 (2007)
  32. Lee, E, "Identification of parasitic gaps in Korean", Studies in Generative Grammar, 17, pp.605~619 (2007)
  33. Lee, E, "Remarks on unifying multiple gaps. Written in Korean. Ms. Daebul Univ", ~ (2007)
  34. Lee,K, "On parasitic gaps in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 3, pp.289~296 (1989)
  35. Lin,J, "Does wh-in-situ license parasitic gaps?", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.298~302 (2005)
  36. May,R, "Logical Form" (1985), MIT Press
  37. Merchant,J, "The syntax of silence" (2001), Oxford Univ. Press
  38. Munn,A, "Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Coordinate Structures", 박사, pp.1993
  39. Munn,A, "ATB movement without identity", Proceedings of ESCOL 97 (1998)
  40. Munn,A, "Explaining parasitic gap restrictions. In Parasitic Gaps. eds. P. Culicover & P. Postal", pp.369~392 (2001), MIT Press
  41. Nissenbaum,J, "Movement and derived predicates: Evidence from parasitic gaps", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 25, pp.247~295 (1998)
  42. Nunes, J, "The Copy Theory of Movement and Linearization of Chains in the Minimalist Program", 박사, pp.1995
  43. Nunes,J, "Sideward movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.303~344 (2001)
  44. Nunes,J, "Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement" (2004), MIT Press
  45. Pesetsky,D, "Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In The representation of (in)definiteness. ed. by E. Reuland & A. Meulen", pp.98~129 (1987), MIT Press
  46. Postal,P, "Parasitic gaps and the across-the-board phenomenon", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.735~754 (1993)
  47. Richards, "What moves where when in which language?", 박사, pp.1998
  48. Rognvaldsson,E, "Coordination, ATB-extractions, and the identification of pro", Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, pp.153~180 (1993)
  49. Ross,J, "Constraints on Variables in Syntax", 박사, pp.1967
  50. Saito,M, "Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications", 박사, pp.1985
  51. Taraldsen,K.T, "The theoretical implications of a class of marked extractions. In Theory of markedness in generative grammar, ed. by A. Beletti & L. Brandi & L. Rizzi", pp.475~516 (1981), Scuola Normale Superiore
  52. Tsai,W.-T, "On economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies", 박사, pp.1994
  53. Williams,E, "Across-the-board rule application", Linguistic Inquiry, 9, pp.31~43 (1978)
  54. Williams,E, "The ATB theory of parasitic gaps", The Linguistic Review, 6, pp.265~279 (1990)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)