『햄릿』의 카니발 미학
The Carnivalesque in Hamlet
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Hamlet Shakespeare put the Elizabethan ideology of the body politic under interrogation at the close of Queen Elizabeth's reign. Scrutinized by the Elizabethan discourses of order, Hamlet's Denmark is not a healthy and functional body but a polluted and rotten one. Denmark's diseased body politic is manifested by three symptoms: the appearance of the Ghost, the anticipated invasion by the Norwegians led by Fortinbras, and the neglect of the proper mourning ritual for the death of King Hamlet by the newly throned Claudius and his followers. The symptoms mark Denmark's important referential registers — i.e. the natural-supernatural order, the foreign relations, and the domestic political and social structure. They concur in locating the pollutant in King Claudius's court. It is because those who are responsible for the health and safety of the Danish body politic are concerned only about their own access to power and the expansion of their political influences, thus causing themselves severed from the rest of Denmark. Interestingly enough, the Danish ruling bloc speak the same language and ideas of kingship and the body politic in general as what the Tudor ideologues advocated. Yet they are blind to the crucial fact that the disruptions of the Danish body politic are provoked by their own wrong doings, including Claudius's double crime and negligence of mourning. Conversely, the underprivileged marginal figures, such as the grave diggers or the unprincely Hamlet acting like a clown, can see the fault-line in the hegemonic practices of the rulers and provide counter-discursive practices that may redress the disarrayed state of Denmark. Especially Hamlet's performance of an antic role, which he assumes in a mourning ritual for his murdered father, touches on the principles of the Bakhtinian grotesque body. It is the clownish Hamlet, not the crown prince, who awakens senses of ethical responsiveness in the Elizabethan audience as well as the unfeeling subjects of Elsinore, thus hinting at the reform in the ideological closure of monarchy on the stage and beyond.
Abstract
In Hamlet Shakespeare put the Elizabethan ideology of the body politic under interrogation at the close of Queen Elizabeth's reign. Scrutinized by the Elizabethan discourses of order, Hamlet's Denmark is not a healthy and functional body but a polluted and rotten one. Denmark's diseased body politic is manifested by three symptoms: the appearance of the Ghost, the anticipated invasion by the Norwegians led by Fortinbras, and the neglect of the proper mourning ritual for the death of King Hamlet by the newly throned Claudius and his followers. The symptoms mark Denmark's important referential registers — i.e. the natural-supernatural order, the foreign relations, and the domestic political and social structure. They concur in locating the pollutant in King Claudius's court. It is because those who are responsible for the health and safety of the Danish body politic are concerned only about their own access to power and the expansion of their political influences, thus causing themselves severed from the rest of Denmark. Interestingly enough, the Danish ruling bloc speak the same language and ideas of kingship and the body politic in general as what the Tudor ideologues advocated. Yet they are blind to the crucial fact that the disruptions of the Danish body politic are provoked by their own wrong doings, including Claudius's double crime and negligence of mourning. Conversely, the underprivileged marginal figures, such as the grave diggers or the unprincely Hamlet acting like a clown, can see the fault-line in the hegemonic practices of the rulers and provide counter-discursive practices that may redress the disarrayed state of Denmark. Especially Hamlet's performance of an antic role, which he assumes in a mourning ritual for his murdered father, touches on the principles of the Bakhtinian grotesque body. It is the clownish Hamlet, not the crown prince, who awakens senses of ethical responsiveness in the Elizabethan audience as well as the unfeeling subjects of Elsinore, thus hinting at the reform in the ideological closure of monarchy on the stage and beyond.
참고문헌 (18)
- 송창섭, "『햄릿』과 셰익스피어 비극의 정치성", Shakespeare Review, 42(4), pp.711~739 (2006)
- Bakhtin, Mikhail, "Rabelais and His World(프랑수아 라블레의 작품과 중세 및 르네상스의 민중문화)" (1968), MIT P
- Charnes, Linda, "The Hamlet Formerly Known As Prince. Shakespeare and Modernity", pp.189~210 (2000), Routledge
- Collins, Stephen L., "From Divine Cosmos to Sovereign State: An Intellectual History of Consciousness and the Idea of Order in Renaissance England" (1989), Oxford UP
- de Grazia, Margreta, ""Hamlet" Without Hamlet" (2007), Cambridge UP
- Engle, Lars, "Shaekspearean Pragmatism: Market of His Time" (1993), Chicago UP
- Garber, Majorie, "Shakespeare After All" (2004), Anchor Books
- Kastan, David Scott, "Proud Majesty Made a Subject: Shakespeare and the Spectacle of Rule", Shakespeare Quarterly, 37, pp.459~475 (1986)
- Liebler, Naomi Conn, "Shakespeare's Festive Tragedy" (1995), Routledge
- Montrose, Louis, "'Shaping Fantasies': Figurations of Gender and Power in Elizabethan Culture. Representing the English Renaissance" (1988), U of California P
- Moretti, Franco, "'A Huge Eclipse': Tragic Form and the Deconsecration of Sovereignty. The Power of Forms in the English Renaissance" (1982), U of Oklahoma P
- Mullaney, Steven, "Mourning and Misogyny: Hamlet, The Revenger's Tragedy, and the Final Progress of Elizabeth I, 1600-1607", Shakespeare Quarterly, 45, pp.67~90 (1994)
- Patterson, Annabel, "Shakespeare and the Popular Voice" (1989), Basil Blackwell
- Rose, Jaquline, "Hamlet?the Mona Lisa of Literature. Shakespeare and Gender", pp.104~119 (1995), Verso
- Shakespeare, William, "Hamlet. The Complete Works of Shakespeare. 4th ed." (1992), HarperCollins
- Tillyard, E.M.W., "The Elizabethan World Picture", Vintage Books
- Wehrs, Donald R., "Moral Physiology, Ethical Prototypes, and the Denaturing of Sense in Shakespearean Tragedy", College Literature, 33(1), pp.67~92 (2006)
- Weimann, Robert, "Shakespeare and the Popular Tradition in the Theater" (1978), Johns Hopkins UP
