“행위성 명사+이다” 구문에 대한 반 분산형태론적 분석
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In a Distributed Morphology (DM)-style analysis of the construction which consists of a verbal noun and ita in Korean, to account for non-nominal properties of a verbal noun, S.-Y. Park (2012) argues that a verbal noun projects a Root Phrase and that there are two dummy verbs which are inserted at PF to support T in Korean, ita and hata. After showing several problems and questions with her analysis, I propose a non-DM-style alternative in which such problems and questions are not raised. I argue that a verbal noun does not project a DP but an NP and that nominal properties such as licensing of GEN and an adnominal ending are licensed by a functional element. I also claim that ita is not a dummy verb but a realization of a nominative case marker as suggested in Choi (2001, 2003).
Abstract
In a Distributed Morphology (DM)-style analysis of the construction which consists of a verbal noun and ita in Korean, to account for non-nominal properties of a verbal noun, S.-Y. Park (2012) argues that a verbal noun projects a Root Phrase and that there are two dummy verbs which are inserted at PF to support T in Korean, ita and hata. After showing several problems and questions with her analysis, I propose a non-DM-style alternative in which such problems and questions are not raised. I argue that a verbal noun does not project a DP but an NP and that nominal properties such as licensing of GEN and an adnominal ending are licensed by a functional element. I also claim that ita is not a dummy verb but a realization of a nominative case marker as suggested in Choi (2001, 2003).
참고문헌 (22)
- 김의수, "한국어의 격과 의미역" (2006), 태학사
- 남길임, "현대 국어 ‘이다’ 구문 연구" (2004), 한국문화사
- 박소영, "‘행위성 명사+이다’ 구문의 통사론적 분석", 생성문법연구, 22(2), pp.391~416 (2012), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 시정곤, "현대 국어 통사론의 탐구" (2002), 월인
- 안명철, "‘이’의 문법적 성격 재고찰", 국어학, 25, pp.29~49 (1995)
- 양정석, "‘이-’ 주격조사설에 대한 반론", 형태론, 5(1), pp.99~110 (2003), 형태론
- 엄정호, "‘-이다’의 ‘이’는 조사인가?", 형태론, 2, pp.333~343 (2000)
- 우순조, "‘이다’와 ‘아니다’의 상관성-표지 개념에 의한 분석-", 형태론, 2, pp.129~138 (2000)
- 최기용, "‘-이다’의 ‘-이’는 주격 조사이다", 형태론, 3, pp.101~112 (2001)
- 최기용, "시정곤(2002) 및 김의수(2002)에서 지적된 몇 가지 의문에 답하여", 형태론, 5(1), pp.111~121 (2003), 형태론
- 최기용, "한국어의 “명사+조사” 구성의 구조", 생성문법연구, 16(3), pp.311~332 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
- 홍용철, "한국어의 명사 확장범주", 언어, 31(4), pp.657~684 (2006), 한국언어학회
- 홍용철, "한국어의 후치 요소와 명사 확장 범주", 생성문법연구, 18(4), pp.743~768 (2008), 한국생성문법학회
- 홍용철, "한국어 명사 외곽 수식어들의 어순과 명사구 구조", 생성문법연구, 20(1), pp.27~50 (2010), 한국생성문법학회
- 홍재성, "프랑스어와 한국어 계사 구문의 유형론적 대조 연구", 학술원 논문집, 46, pp.1~61 (2010)
- Abney, Steven., "The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect", 박사, pp.1987
- Alexiadou, Artemis, "Noun phrase in the generative perspective" (2007), Mouton de Gruyter
- Choi, Kiyong., "On the so-called copular construction in Korean", Eoneohag, 15, pp.397~413 (1993)
- Chomsky, Noam., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Giusti, Giuliana., "The functional structure of noun phrases, In Functional structure in DP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol 1", pp.54~90 (2002), Oxford University Press
- Longobardi, G., "The structure of DPs : Principles, parameters, and problems. In Handbook of syntactic theory, ed. by M. Baltin and C. Collins, 562-603, In The structure of DPs: Principles, parameters, and problems. In Handbook of syntactic theory", pp.562~603 (2001), Blackwell
- 박소영, "Verbal Noun Constructions Revisited: Restructuring vs. Non-restructuring Complementation", 생성문법연구, 20(2), pp.207~227 (2010), 한국생성문법학회