본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Negation in Let Imperatives in English and Key-ha-la Imperatives in Korean

1

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The primary goal of this paper is to provide a syntactic account for the difference between let imperatives in English and the Korean equivalent constructions, namely key-ha-la imperatives, in how they are negated with sentential negation. Specifically, the paper focuses on the hitherto neglected fact that sentential negation in English let imperatives can only target the entire sentence, while sentential negation in Korean key-ha-la imperatives can negate either the entire sentence or the base predicate dominated by key-ha 'let.' Answering where this cross-linguistic difference comes from, we argue that the verb let in the English let imperatives takes a small clause, lacking TP, an essential element for licensing sentential negation, while key-ha 'let' in the Korean equivalent selects for TP. Given this difference in the structural make-up, we show that the contrast between the two constructions in the scope of sentential negation can be captured by Zanuttini's (1996) generalization that licensing of sentential negation is contingent upon the existence of TP.

Abstract

The primary goal of this paper is to provide a syntactic account for the difference between let imperatives in English and the Korean equivalent constructions, namely key-ha-la imperatives, in how they are negated with sentential negation. Specifically, the paper focuses on the hitherto neglected fact that sentential negation in English let imperatives can only target the entire sentence, while sentential negation in Korean key-ha-la imperatives can negate either the entire sentence or the base predicate dominated by key-ha 'let.' Answering where this cross-linguistic difference comes from, we argue that the verb let in the English let imperatives takes a small clause, lacking TP, an essential element for licensing sentential negation, while key-ha 'let' in the Korean equivalent selects for TP. Given this difference in the structural make-up, we show that the contrast between the two constructions in the scope of sentential negation can be captured by Zanuttini's (1996) generalization that licensing of sentential negation is contingent upon the existence of TP.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Beukama, Frits, "A Government-Binding Perspective on the Imperative in English", Journal of Linguistics, 25, pp.417~436 (1989)
  2. Bošković, Željko, "On NPs and Clauses", 석사, pp.2010
  3. 최기용, "The Structure of Constituent Negation in English*", 생성문법연구, 14(2), pp.2~2 (2004), 한국생성문법학회
  4. Cinque, Guglielmo, "Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective" (1999), Oxford University Press
  5. Clark, Billy, "Let and Let's: Procedural Encoding and Explicature", Lingua, 90, pp.173~200 (1993)
  6. Hagstrom, Paul, "Implications of Child Error for the Synax of Negatioon in Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 11, pp.211~242 (2002)
  7. Han, Chung-hye, "The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar" (2000), Garland Publishing
  8. Han, Chung-hye, "On Negative Imperatives in Korean", Proceedings of the 16th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, pp.59~68 (2002), The Korean Society for Language and Information
  9. Han, Chung-hye, "On Negative Imperatives in Korean", Linguistic Inquiry, 38(2), pp.373~395 (2007)
  10. Kim, Kyunghwan, "The Syntax and Semantics of Causative Construction in Korean", 박사, pp.1994
  11. Lasnik, Howard, "Verbal Morphology: Syntactic Structure Meets the Minimalist Program, In Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Carlos Otero", pp.251~275 (1995), Georgetown University Press
  12. Lee, Chung-Min, "Abstract Syntax and Korean with reference to English", 박사, pp.1993
  13. Marantz, Alec, "Words", Talk delivered at WCCFL, ~ (1997)
  14. Park, Myung-Kwan, "A Morpho-synactic Study of Korean Verbal Inflection", 박사, pp.1994
  15. Pollock, Jean-Yves, "Verb-movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.365~424 (1989)
  16. Potsdam, Eric, "Syntactic Issues in the English Imperative" (1998), Garland Publishing
  17. Quirk, Randolph, "A Student's Grammar of the English Language" (1990), Prenctice Hall
  18. Rizzi, Luigi, "The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery, In Elements of Grammar" (1997), Kluwer
  19. Seppänen, Aimo, "Quantifiers as Functional Heads: A Study of Quantifier Float in Hebrew", Lingua, 84, pp.159~180 (1977)
  20. Shibatani, Masayoshi, "Lexical vs. Periphrastic Causatives in Korean", Journal of Linguistics, 9, pp.281~297 (1973)
  21. Sohn, Keun-Won, "Negative Polarity Items, Scope and Economy", 박사, pp.1995
  22. 여승주, "Distinguishing Periphrastic Causatives from Morphological Causatives", 생성문법연구, 15(2), pp.231~249 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
  23. Zanuttini, Raffaella, "On the Relevance of Tense for Sentential Negation, In Parameters and Functional Heads", pp.181~207 (1996), Oxford University Press
  24. Zanuttini, Raffaella, "A Syntactic Analysis of Interpretive Restrictions on Imperative, Promissive, and Exhortative Subjects", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 30(4), pp.1231~1274 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)