셰익스피어의 『페리클리즈』에 담긴 이중의 전략: 텍스트와 서브텍스트
Double Strategy in Shakespeare’s Pericles: Text and Subtext
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Pericles, Shakespeare creates dramatic effects using the dynamic alternation of speech and spectacle, past and present. Shakespeare’s double strategy reaches a climax in the two recognition scenes at the end of the play. He pursues not only the identification of separated individuals but the identification of individuals and Supernatural Being. The resolution of the text is challenged by the subtext, discourse of silence. Making some alterations to his source material, Shakespeare schemes a possible incest relationship between Pericles and Thaisa. The subtext of Pericles includes Pericles’ inner fear and anxiety for incest relationship, especially between father and daughter. Shakespeare, on the other hand, insinuates that incest is a universal condition based on Biblical Fall.
Abstract
In Pericles, Shakespeare creates dramatic effects using the dynamic alternation of speech and spectacle, past and present. Shakespeare’s double strategy reaches a climax in the two recognition scenes at the end of the play. He pursues not only the identification of separated individuals but the identification of individuals and Supernatural Being. The resolution of the text is challenged by the subtext, discourse of silence. Making some alterations to his source material, Shakespeare schemes a possible incest relationship between Pericles and Thaisa. The subtext of Pericles includes Pericles’ inner fear and anxiety for incest relationship, especially between father and daughter. Shakespeare, on the other hand, insinuates that incest is a universal condition based on Biblical Fall.
참고문헌 (21)
- Adelman, Janet, "Pericles: Critical Essays" (2000), Garland Publishing, Inc
- Badawi, M. M., "Background to Shakespeare" (1981), The Macmillan Press Ltd
- Barber, C. L., "The Whole Journey: Shakespeare’s Power of Development" (1986), U of California P
- Curtright, Travis, "'Falseness cannot come from thee’: Marina as Character and Orator in Shakespeare’s Pericles", Literary Imagination, 11(1), pp.99~110 (2009)
- Finkelstein, Richard, "Pericles, Paul, and Protestantism", Comparative Drama, 44(2), pp.101~129 (2010)
- Hoeniger, F. D., "Gower and Shakespeare in Pericles", Shakespeare Quarterly, 33(4), pp.461~479 (1982)
- Hunt, Maurice, "A Looking Glass for Pericles", Essays in Literature, 13(1), pp.3~11 (1986)
- Kahn, Coppelia, "Pericles: Critical Essays" (2000), Garland Publishing, Inc
- Knapp, Peggy Ann, "The Orphic Vision of Pericles", Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 15(4), pp.615~626 (1974)
- Knight, G. Wilson, "Pericles: Critical Essays. Ed. David Skeele" (2000), Garland Publishing, Inc.
- Moore, Jeanie Grant, "Riddled Romance: Kingship and Kinship in Pericles", Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature, 57(1), pp.33~48 (2003)
- Mowat, Barbara A., "The Dramaturgy of Shakespeare’s Romances" (1976), The UP of Georgia
- Shakespeare, William, "The New Cambridge Shakespeare" (2006), Cambridge UP
- Shakespeare, William, "The Riverside Shakespeare" (1997), Cengage
- Shakespeare, William, "The Arden Shakespeare" (1990), Methuen
- Skeele, David, "Pericles: Critical Essays" (2000), Garland Publishing, Inc
- Thorne, W. B., "Pericles and the ‘Incest-Fertility’ Opposition", Shakespeare Quarterly, 22(1), pp.43~56 (1971)
- Uphaus, Robert W., "Beyond Tragedy" (1981), Kentucky UP
- Warren, Roger, "Theatrical Use and Editorial Abuse: More Painful Adventures for Pericles", The Review of English Studies, 49(196), pp.478~486 (1998)
- Werth, Tiffany Jo, "The Fabulous Dark Cloister" (2011), The Johns Hopkins UP
- Williams, Deanne, "Papa Don’t Preach: The Power of Prolixity in Pericles", University of Toronto Quarterly, 71(2), pp.595~622 (2002)