Aspectual Taxonomy without Feature Specification
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Theories of verb aspect have often assumed feature-based aspectual classifications (e.g., Smith (1997)). In this paper, it is argued that aspectual taxonomies based on feature specification are not adequate in that the features such as [durative] and [telic] are problematic in their application. As an alternative, we propose to adopt the system in Carlson (1981), where three grammatical criteria are used for categorizing inherent verb aspect types. In the proposed system, achievement verbs in Smith (1997) are divided into two different classes, and semelfactives are not treated as an independent category any more. As for conventional stative verbs, the distinction between statives proper and dynamic states is made. The necessity of such a taxonomy of aspect is supported by both Korean and English data.
Abstract
Theories of verb aspect have often assumed feature-based aspectual classifications (e.g., Smith (1997)). In this paper, it is argued that aspectual taxonomies based on feature specification are not adequate in that the features such as [durative] and [telic] are problematic in their application. As an alternative, we propose to adopt the system in Carlson (1981), where three grammatical criteria are used for categorizing inherent verb aspect types. In the proposed system, achievement verbs in Smith (1997) are divided into two different classes, and semelfactives are not treated as an independent category any more. As for conventional stative verbs, the distinction between statives proper and dynamic states is made. The necessity of such a taxonomy of aspect is supported by both Korean and English data.
참고문헌 (36)
- Bach, Emmon, "The algebra of events", Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, pp.5~16 (1986)
- Bickerton, Derek, "Roots of Language" (1981), Karoma Press
- Brown, Roger, "A First Language: the Early Stages" (1973), Harvard University Press
- Carlson, Lauri, "Aspect and quantification", Syntax and Semantics, 14, pp.31~64 (1981), Academic Press
- Choe, Hyon-Bae, "6th edition" (1977), Cengum-sa
- 정태구, "국어 존재구문의 의미와 사건구조", 언어, 32(4), pp.779~801 (2007), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Comrie, Bernard, "Aspect" (1976), Cambridge University Press
- Croft, William, "Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure" (2012), Oxford University Press
- de Swart, Henriette, "Aspect shift and coercion", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16(2), pp.347~385 (1998)[DOI]
- Dahl, Osten, "On the definition of the telic-atelic (bounded-nonbounded)distinction", Syntax and Semantics, 14, pp.79~90 (1981), Academic Press
- Depraetere, Ilse, "On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity", Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, pp.1~19 (1995), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Dowty, David, "Word Meaning and Montague Grammar" (1979), Reidel
- Filip, Hana, "Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect", pp.217~256 (2008), John Benjamins Publishing Co
- Hay, Jennifer, "Semantics and Linguistic Theory(SALT) IX", pp.127~144 (1999), CLC Publications
- Huh, Woong, (1983), Saem Mwunhwa-sa
- Kenny, Anthony, "Action, Emotion and Will" (1963), Routledge
- 김종복, "Ambiguities in the Korean -KO ISSTA Imperfective Construction", 언어, 36(4), pp.863~885 (2011), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Kim, Jong-Bok, "Aspectual properties of the Korean imperfective construction", Language and Linguistics, 14(6), pp.1035~1074 (2013)[DOI]
- Kim, Yookyung, "The resultative progressive in Korean", Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS), 29, pp.251~265 (1993)
- Lee, EunHee, "Stative progressives in Korean and English", Journal of Pragmatics, 38, pp.695~717 (2006)
- Lee, Hyo Sang, "Tense, aspect, and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal suffixes in Korean from a typological perspective", Ph.D, pp.1991
- Li, Ping, "The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect" (2000), The Hague
- Moens, Marc, "Tense, Aspect and Temporal Reference", Ph.D, pp.1987
- Moens, Marc, "Temporal ontology and temporal reference", Computational Linguistics, 14, pp.15~28 (1988)
- Nam, Ki-Shim, "kwuke mwunpep-uy sice mwunce-ey kwanhan yenkwu" (1978), Tower Press
- construction in Korean, "Korean Linguistics", 2014, 18~50, :18–50.
- Rappaport Hovav, Malka, "Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect", pp.13~42 (2008), John Benjamins Publishing Co
- Rothstein, Susan, "Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation", pp.175~198 (2008), Mouton De Gruyter
- Slobin, Dan Isaac, "The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition" (1985), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Smith, Carlota, "The Parameters of Aspect" (1997), Kluwer
- Sohn, Ho-Min, "Linguistic Expeditions" (1986), Hanshin Publishing Co
- 서성기, "‘-고 있다‘ 결과 구문의 도출", 생성문법연구, 26(4), pp.453~474 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 서성기, "State Readings and Boundedness in the Korean Progressive", 생성문법연구, 27(3), pp.649~674 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Vendler, Zeno, "Linguistics and Philosophy" (1967), Cornell University Press
- Vendler, Zeno, "Verbs and times", The Philosophical Review, 56, pp.143~160 (1957)
- Vlach, Frank, "The semantics of the progressive", Syntax and Semantics, 14, pp.271~292 (1981), Academic Press