본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 유사수문구문의 두 가지 구조와 특정성

Two Structures and Specificationality of Korean Sluicing-like Constructions

이숙희
한국생성문법학회|2021.02|생성문법연구 (Studies in Generative Grammar)|제31권 제1호|pp. 107-128|DOI 10.15860/sigg.31.1.202102.107

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

focustopiccopulasluicingcleftmerger typesprouting typespecificationalpredicational
주제분류언어학

초록

This paper concerns structural and semantic-informational differences between the merger(M)-type and the sprouting(S)-type of Korean sluicing-like constructions. It focuses on the relevance of an indefinite correlate in the preceding clause to the optionality of a postposition after the wh-phrase in the following clause. It is proposed that kukey ‘it’ is a D-pronoun in the M-type construction, while it is a variable in the S-type construction. Both function as a discourse linker, introducing an indefinite meaning or an incomplete discourse situation of the preceding clause to the subject topic position of the following clause. So the M-type construction constitutes a copular structure, while the S-type construction a truncated cleft structure. In respect of semantic-informational structure, the two types both convey specificational meaning, which is verified through the investigation of subject-honorification data. The predicational behavior of the M-type construction and inversion impossibility of the S-type construction are also explained as phenomena expected from the different properties of the two types.

Abstract

This paper concerns structural and semantic-informational differences between the merger(M)-type and the sprouting(S)-type of Korean sluicing-like constructions. It focuses on the relevance of an indefinite correlate in the preceding clause to the optionality of a postposition after the wh-phrase in the following clause. It is proposed that kukey ‘it’ is a D-pronoun in the M-type construction, while it is a variable in the S-type construction. Both function as a discourse linker, introducing an indefinite meaning or an incomplete discourse situation of the preceding clause to the subject topic position of the following clause. So the M-type construction constitutes a copular structure, while the S-type construction a truncated cleft structure. In respect of semantic-informational structure, the two types both convey specificational meaning, which is verified through the investigation of subject-honorification data. The predicational behavior of the M-type construction and inversion impossibility of the S-type construction are also explained as phenomena expected from the different properties of the two types.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Adger, David, "Predication and equation", Linguistic Inquiry, 34(3), pp.325~359 (2003)
  2. Barros, Matthew, "Sluicing and identity in Ellipsis", Doctoral, pp.2014
  3. Birner, Betty J, "The Discourse Function of Inversion in English" (1996), Garland
  4. 최기용, "Subject Honorification in Korean: In Defense of Agr and Head-Spec Agreement", 어학연구, 46(1), pp.59~82 (2010), 언어교육원
  5. van Craenenbroek, Jeroen, "Ellipsis, identity, and accommodation: the case of case", Paper presented in Identity in ellipsis conference (2013), Leiden University
  6. Declerck, Renaat, "Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudo-clefts" (1988), Foris Publications
  7. den Dikken, Marcel, "Cleft Structures", pp.35~70 (2013), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  8. den Dikken, Marcel, "The Companion to Syntax", pp.1~138 (2017), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  9. Fernández-Sánchez, Javier, "Language and Linguistic Compass", pp.1~39 (2020), Wiley and Sons Ltd
  10. Heller, Daphna, "Identity and Information, Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects of Specificational Sentences", Doctoral, pp.2005
  11. Heycock, Caroline, "Pseudocleft connectedness : implications for the LF interface level", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.365~397 (1999)
  12. Heycock, Caroline, "Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 21", pp.101~125 (2002), Cascadilla Press
  13. Higgins, Francis Roger, "The Pseudo-cleft Construction in English" (1979), Garland
  14. 홍용철, "“것” 분열 구문에서의 “것”의 유정성", 생성문법연구, 27(3), pp.713~731 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  15. Hong, Yong-Tcheol, "Hyendaienehakuy Pwunyelmwun Yenkwu: Thongsawa Uymim", pp.157~188 (2020), Global Contents
  16. 김종복, "The Korean Sluicing: As a Family of Constructions", 생성문법연구, 23(1), pp.103~130 (2013), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  17. Kim, Jong-Bok, "Syntactic and semantic identity in Korean sluicing: a direct interpretation approach", Lingua, 166, pp.260~293 (2015)
  18. 김선웅, "A Predicate Inversion Analysis of Kukes in Korean “Sluicing”", 언어연구, 29(1), pp.217~233 (2012), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  19. Kim, Sun-Woong, "Hyendaienehakuy Pwunyelmwun Yenkwu: Thongsawa Uymi", pp.189~214 (2020), Global Contents
  20. 이숙희, "한국어 유사 수문구문에 대한 재고", 생성문법연구, 29(1), pp.97~121 (2019), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  21. 이숙희, "한국어 sprouting 유형 유사수문구문의 분열구조 분석", 생성문법연구, 30(1), pp.115~132 (2020), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  22. Merchant, Jason, "The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Identity, and the Theory of Ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
  23. Merchant, Jason, "Fragments and ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, pp.66~738 (2004)
  24. Merchant, Jason, "Voice and ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 44, pp.77~108 (2013)
  25. Mikkelsen, Line, "Copular Clauses : Specification, Predication and Equation" (2005), John Benjamins
  26. Mikkelsen, Line, "Kopulaverben und Kopulasätze: Intersprachliche und Intrasprachliche Aspekte", pp.47~68 (2007), Niemeyer Verlag
  27. Mikkelsen, Line, "Semantics: an International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol 2", pp.1805~1829 (2011), Mouton de Gruyter
  28. Moro, Andres, "The Raising of Predicates" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  29. 옥성수, "비이동 관점에서의 한국어 수문 유형 구문 재분석", 언어과학, 19(1), pp.155~180 (2012), 한국언어과학회
  30. 박범식, "Deriving Multiple Sluicing in Korean", 생성문법연구, 17(4), pp.515~533 (2007), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  31. Park,Myung-Kwan, "Subject-less Clefts in Korean : Towards a Deletion Analysis", 어학연구, 37(4) (2001), 언어교육원
  32. 박명관, "Cleft Sources for the Sluice and Identity in Ellipsis", 언어, 40(1), pp.87~106 (2015), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  33. Park, So-Young, "Hyendaienehakuy Pwunyelmwun Yenkwu: Thongsawa Uymi", pp.90~123 (2020), Global Contents
  34. Sohn, Keun-Won, "A non-sluicing, non-clefting approach to copula constructions", Studies in Generative Grammar, 10(2), pp.267~294 (2000)
  35. 손근원, "Kes-clefts, Connectedness Effects, and the Implications Thereof", 생성문법연구, 14(4), pp.561~571 (2004), 한국생성문법학회
  36. Vincente, Luis, "Sluicing and its subtypes", Universität Potsdam, ~ (2014)
  37. 위혜경, "슬루싱의 두 가지 의미 유형", 언어와 정보, 19(2), pp.109~125 (2015), 한국언어정보학회
  38. Wee, Hae-Kyung, "Hyendaienehakuy Pwunyelmwun Yenkwu: Thongsawa Uymi", pp.320~344 (2020), Global Contents

관련 논문AI추천

한국어 sprouting 유형 유사수문구문의 분열구조 분석이숙희한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2020 · 제30권 제1호한국어 유사 수문구문에 대한 재고이숙희한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2019 · 제29권 제1호한국어 수문문에 대한 분열문 분석 재고박소영사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2015 · 제71호A Predicate Inversion Analysis of Kukes in Korean “Sluicing”김선웅한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2012 · 제29권 제1호What Sluicing Comes from in Korean is Pseudo-cleft김지은한국언어학회 · 언어2012 · 제37권 제1호Diagnosing Sluicing Constructions in Korean: Sluicing, Cleft, or What?최영식한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2019 · 제34권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

Semantic Compatibility Condition in American English: A Big Data-based Trend Analysis of Ethnic Slurs윤수원pp. 1-24Where and Why are Labels Necessary?Barrie Michael Jonathan Mathewpp. 25-52Specified Subject Condition Effects in Korean Multiple Subject Constructions and Their Implications윤정미pp. 53-85Toward a Uniform Analysis of Romance SE성문현, Barrie Michael Jonathan Mathewpp. 87-105A Null Argument as pro : Evidence from Recovery of a Focus Particle박명관pp. 129-146
원문 보기