본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Triangulating Think-alouds and Questionnaires in Reading Strategy Assessment: An Exploratory Study

0

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study was designed to investigate reading strategies of L2 learners, using a combination of a questionnaire and think-aloud protocols. The participants’ reading strategies were compared to find whether the results of the questionnaire and think-aloud protocols compensate or contradict each other. In addition, it was examined whether the ordering of the two instruments would influence strategy awareness and use and reading comprehension scores. Only the task-specific reading strategies from the questionnaire were employed to read a text, and items such as “skipping” and “adding information” were newly found by think-aloud protocols. Also, the participants were observed to do ineffective behaviors such as “being inflexible” and “mistranslating,” which might not have been discovered when using the questionnaire only. Overall, the questionnaire and think-aloud protocols turned out to be complementary to each other rather than conflicting. The participants’ reading comprehension scores were not influenced by the ordering, however, after a certain task, they were able to reflect on their strategy use more accurately than without or before a task. Thus, if used properly for their own purposes, both instruments are effective to measure students’ reading strategies complementarily.

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate reading strategies of L2 learners, using a combination of a questionnaire and think-aloud protocols. The participants’ reading strategies were compared to find whether the results of the questionnaire and think-aloud protocols compensate or contradict each other. In addition, it was examined whether the ordering of the two instruments would influence strategy awareness and use and reading comprehension scores. Only the task-specific reading strategies from the questionnaire were employed to read a text, and items such as “skipping” and “adding information” were newly found by think-aloud protocols. Also, the participants were observed to do ineffective behaviors such as “being inflexible” and “mistranslating,” which might not have been discovered when using the questionnaire only. Overall, the questionnaire and think-aloud protocols turned out to be complementary to each other rather than conflicting. The participants’ reading comprehension scores were not influenced by the ordering, however, after a certain task, they were able to reflect on their strategy use more accurately than without or before a task. Thus, if used properly for their own purposes, both instruments are effective to measure students’ reading strategies complementarily.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. Afflerbach, P, "The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers′ main idea construction strategies" (1990)
  2. Afflerbach, P, "Verbal reports and protocol analysis", pp.163~179 (2000), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  3. Anderson, N. J, "Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing" (1991)
  4. Alfassi, M, "Reading to learn: Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students", 97(4), pp.171~184 (2004)
  5. Azevedo, R, "Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students′ learning with hypermedia?", 96(3), pp.523~535 (2004)
  6. Behling, O, "Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: Problems and solutions" (2000), Thousand Oaks: Sage
  7. Boerkaerts, M, "The on-line motivation questionnaire: A self-report instrument to assess students′ context sensitivity", 12, pp.77~120 (2002), Amsterdam: JAI
  8. Branch, J. L, "Investigating the information-seeking processes of adolescents: The value of using Think Alouds and Think Afters", 22(4), pp.371~392 (2000)
  9. Chamot, A. U, "Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research", 25, pp.112~130 (2005)
  10. Chamot, A. U, "Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching", 1(1), pp.14~26 (2004)
  11. Cohen, A. D, "Strategies in learning and using a second language" (1998), Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman
  12. D?rnyei, Z, "Individual differences in second language learning", pp.589~630 (2003), Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing
  13. Ericsson, K. A, "Protocol analysis: Verbal report as data" (1993)
  14. Ehrman, M. E, "Adult language learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting" (1990)
  15. Feyton, C. M, "Consciousness raising and strategy use", 10(1, 2), pp.15~38 (1999)
  16. Fry, E, "Elementary reading instruction" (1977)
  17. Gaffney, J. S, "Trends in reading research in the United States: Changing intellectual currents over three decades", pp.53~74 (2000), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  18. Garcia, G. E, "Bilingual children′s reading", pp.813~834 (2000), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
  19. Green, J, "A closer look at learner strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender", 29, pp.261~297 (1995)
  20. Guerrero, M. C. M, "Early stages of L2 inner speech development: What verbal reports suggest", 14(1), pp.90~112 (2004)
  21. Jim?nez, R. T, "The reading strategies of bilingual Latina", o students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles, 1996, pp.31(1), 90~112
  22. Kern, R. G, "The role of mental translation in second language reading" (1994)
  23. Kuusela, H, "A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis", 113(3), pp.387~404 (2000)
  24. Lan R, "Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan", 41, pp.339~379 (2003)
  25. Lee, Hyo-Woong, "A study on the relationships between attitudes, motivation, and strategies in learning English", 14(1), pp.189~211 (2002)
  26. Leighton, J. P, "Avoiding misconceptions, misuse, and missed opportunities: The collection of verbal reports in educational achievement testing", pp.1~10 (2004)
  27. Levine, A, "Data-collecting on reading-writing strategies: A comparison of instruments: A case study", 3(3), pp.1~16 (1998)
  28. Leow, R. P, "Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior", 51, pp.113~155 (2001)
  29. Leow, R. P, "Think aloud or not to think aloud: The issue of reactivity in SLA research methodology", 26(1), pp.35~57 (2004)
  30. Li, S, "Metacognitive strategies in second language academic reading: A qualitative investigation", 15(3), pp.199~216 (1996)
  31. LoCastro, V, "Learning strategies and learning environments" (1994)
  32. Matsumoto, K, "Inspection, verbal reports and second language learning strategy research" (1994)
  33. Mokhtari, K, "Assessing students′ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies", 94(2), pp.249~259 (2002)
  34. Mokhtari, K, "Measuring ESL students′ reading strategies", 25(3), pp.2~10 (2002)
  35. O′Malley, J. M, "Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students" (1985)
  36. Oxford, R. L, "Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know" (1990)
  37. Oxford, R. L, "Employing a questionnaire to assess the use of language learning strategies", 7, pp.25~45 (1996)
  38. Oxford, R. L, "Teaching and researching language learner strategies: Strategic, critical, transformative learning for self-empowerment" (1996), London: Longman
  39. Oxford, R. L, "Adults′ language learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States", 23(3), pp.359~386 (1995)
  40. Oxford, R. L, "Effect of the presence and difficulty of task on strategy use: An exploratory study", 42, pp.1~47 (2004)
  41. Palincsar, A. S, "Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities" (1984)
  42. Park, Kyungja, "Language learning strategies" (2003), Seoul: Kyobo-Thompson
  43. Payne, J. W, "Thinking aloud: Insights into information processing" (1994)
  44. Politzer, R. L, "An exploratory study of learning behaviors and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence" (1985)
  45. Pressley, M, "Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading" (1995), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
  46. Pressley, M, "What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of?", pp.545~561 (2000), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  47. Seng, G. H, "Use of L1 in L2 reading comprehension among tertiary ESL learners", 18(1), pp.29~54 (2006)
  48. Serren, G, "Improving reading comprehension: A comparative study of metacognitive strategies (Report No.CS-510-943)" (2002), Kean University
  49. Singhal, M, "Reading proficiency, reading strategies, metacognitive awareness and L2 readers", 1(9) (2001)
  50. Upton, T. A, "First and second language use in reading comprehension strategies of Japanese ESL students", 3(1), pp.35~61 (1997)
  51. Vygotsky, L. S, "Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes" (1978)
  52. Winne, P. H, "Methodological issues and advances in research tactics, strategies, and self-regulated learning", 12, pp.121~156 (2002), Amsterdam: JAI
  53. Winne, P. H, "Measuring self-regulated learning", pp.532~566 (2000), San Diego, CA: Academic Press
  54. Young, D. J, "Processing strategies of foreign language readers: Authentic and edited input" (1993)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)