본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Co-initiations in EFL Collaborative Teaching Interaction

이미진
한국영어교육학회 (Korea Association Of Teachers Of English)|2017.09|영어교육 (English Teaching)|제72권 제3호|pp. 3-24

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

co-teachingIRFinitiationcollaborative teaching
주제분류영어와문학

초록

The present study examines the interactional organization of EFL collaborative teaching interaction by focusing on the teachers’ co-initiation turns. Drawing on conversation analysis, the aim is to produce a fine-grained description of the interactional structure that sets coteaching apart from those of single-teacher classroom interactions. More importantly, the article also seeks to promote a deeper understanding on effective practices that teachers draw on to collaboratively manage their local classroom contingencies, coordinate student participation, and ultimately, to move towards accomplishing the curricular focus of the lesson. The analysis highlights that through the conjoined initiation turns, the teachers were able to elicit the instantaneous participation from the students to present in front of the classroom. In addition, by adjusting and reformulating the scope of each other’s initiation turns, they are also able to efficiently guide the students toward providing the correct response. Such collaboration, as it occurs in situ in the classroom, realizes a particular type of interactional competence that requires close and sensitive monitoring of both the students’ and the other co-teacher’s actions.

Abstract

The present study examines the interactional organization of EFL collaborative teaching interaction by focusing on the teachers’ co-initiation turns. Drawing on conversation analysis, the aim is to produce a fine-grained description of the interactional structure that sets coteaching apart from those of single-teacher classroom interactions. More importantly, the article also seeks to promote a deeper understanding on effective practices that teachers draw on to collaboratively manage their local classroom contingencies, coordinate student participation, and ultimately, to move towards accomplishing the curricular focus of the lesson. The analysis highlights that through the conjoined initiation turns, the teachers were able to elicit the instantaneous participation from the students to present in front of the classroom. In addition, by adjusting and reformulating the scope of each other’s initiation turns, they are also able to efficiently guide the students toward providing the correct response. Such collaboration, as it occurs in situ in the classroom, realizes a particular type of interactional competence that requires close and sensitive monitoring of both the students’ and the other co-teacher’s actions.

참고문헌 (61)

  1. Aronsson, K., "Activity contracts and directives in everyday family politics", Discourse & Society, 22(2), pp.137~154 (2011)
  2. Beninghof, A. M., "Co-teaching that works: Structures and strategies for maximizing student learning" (2012), Jossey-Bass
  3. Carless, D. R., "Good practices in team teaching in Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong", System, 34(3), pp.341~351 (2006)
  4. Carless, D. R., "Effective team teaching between local and nativespeaking English teachers", Language and Education, 20(6), pp.463~477 (2006)
  5. Carlsen, W., "Questioning in classrooms : a sociolinguistic perspective", Review of Educational Research, 61, pp.157~178 (1991)
  6. Cazden, C. B., "Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning" (1988), Heinemann
  7. ESL classroom: Rationale, research, reflections, and recommendations, "Co-teaching and other collaborative practices in the EFL", pp.2012, Dahlman, A.
  8. Davison, C., "Collaboration between ESL and content teachers: How do we know when we are doing it right?", International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(4), pp.454~475 (2006)
  9. Ellis, R., "The study of second language acquisition" (1994), Oxford University Press
  10. "Teaching conditions" (2017)[URL]
  11. "Timeline" (2017)[URL]
  12. Goffman, E., "Forms of talk" (1981), University of Pennsylvania Press
  13. Hall, J. K., "Differential teacher attention to student utterances: The construction of different opportunities for learning in the IRF", Linguistics and Education, 9(3), pp.287~311 (1998)
  14. Hall, J. K., "Teacher-student interaction and language learning", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, pp.186~203 (2002)
  15. He, A. W., "The grammatical and interactional organization of teacher’s directives : Implications for socialization of Chinese American children", Linguistics and Education, 11(2), pp.119~140 (2000)
  16. Hellermann, J., "The interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange : Teacher repetition in feedback moves", Language in Society, 32(1), pp.79~104 (2003)
  17. Hellermann, J., "The sequential and prosodic co-construction of a"quiz game"activity in classroom talk", Journal of Pragmatics, 37(6), pp.919~944 (2005)
  18. Heritage, J., "Structures of social action", pp.299~345 (1984), Cambridge University Press
  19. Jacknick, C. M., "Breaking in is hard to do : How students negotiate classroom activity shifts", Classroom Discourse, 2(1), pp.20~38 (2011)
  20. Jefferson, G., "Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric", pp.11~38 (1984), Cleup
  21. 전인재, "Exploring the Co-teaching Practice of Native and Non-native English Teachers in Korea", 영어교육, 65(3), pp.43~67 (2010), 한국영어교육학회
  22. 김명희, "A Narrative Inquiry of a Korean English Teacher’s First Journey Through Co-teaching", 영어교육, 65(4), pp.179~207 (2010), 한국영어교육학회
  23. Ko, S., "Multiple-response sequences in classroom talk", Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 32(1), pp.1~18 (2009)
  24. Koole, T., "Displays of epistemic access : student responses to teacher explanations", Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43(2), pp.183~209 (2010)
  25. Koole, T., "The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics", pp.977~982 (2012), Blackwell Publishing Ltd
  26. Koshik, I., "Designedly incomplete utterances : A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences", Research on Language & Social Interaction, 35(3), pp.277~309 (2002)
  27. Lee, J., "The interactional organization of bilingual co-teaching in South Korea", doctor, pp.2015
  28. Lee, Y. -A., "Respecifying display questions: Interactional resources for language teaching", TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), pp.691~713 (2006)
  29. Lee, Y. -A., "Yes-no questions in the third-turn position : Pedagogical discourse processes", Discourse Processes, 45(3), pp.237~262 (2008)
  30. Lerner, G. H., "Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities", Discourse Processes, 19, pp.111~131 (1995)
  31. Lerner, G. H., "Interaction and grammar", pp.238~276 (1996), Cambridge University Press
  32. Lerner, G. H., "The language of turn and sequence", pp.225~256 (2002), Oxford University Press
  33. Liu, L., "Co-teaching between native and non-native English teachers : An exploration of co-teaching models and strategies in the Chinese primary school context", Reflections on English Language Teaching, 7(2), pp.103~118 (2008)
  34. Long, M. H., "Classroomoriented research in second language acquisition", pp.268~285 (1983), Newbury House
  35. Lyle, S., "Dialogic teaching : Discussing theoretical contexts and reviewing evidence from classroom practice", Language and Education, 22(3), pp.222~240 (2008)
  36. Macbeth, D., "Hugh Mehan’s learning lessons reconsidered : On the differences between the naturalistic and critical analysis of classroom discourse", American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), pp.239~280 (2003)
  37. Margutti, P., "Positive evaluation of student answers in classroom instruction", Language and Education, 28(5), pp.436~458 (2014)
  38. Markee, N., "Conversation analysis" (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum
  39. Mehan, H., "Learning lessons: The social organization of classroom behavior" (1979), Harvard University Press
  40. Mercer, N., "Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom", Language and Education, 23(4), pp.353~369 (2009)
  42. Mondada, L., "Second language acquisition as situated practice : Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom", The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), pp.501~518 (2004)
  43. Nystrand, M., "Questions in time : Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse", Discourse Processes, 35(2), pp.37~41 (2003)
  44. Park, J. -E., "English co-teaching and teacher collaboration : A micro-interactional perspective", System, 44, pp.34~44 (2014)
  45. 박미정, "원어민보조교사와의 협동수업이 중학생의 영어능력향상에 미치는 영향", 현대영어영문학, 53(1), pp.61~88 (2009), 한국현대영어영문학회
  46. Korean linguistics Vol 8, "Japanese", pp.1998, Park, Y. -Y.
  47. Psathas, G., "Conversation analysis: The study of talk in interaction" (1995), Sage
  48. Raymond, G., "Grammar and social organization: Yes", no interrogatives and the structure of responding, 2003, pp.68(6), 939~967
  49. Sacks, H., "A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation", Language, 50, pp.696~735 (1974)
  50. Schegloff, E. A., "Reply to Wetherell", Discourse & Society, 9(3), pp.413~416 (1998)
  51. Schegloff, E. A., "Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation", Language in Society, 29(1), pp.1~63 (2000)
  52. Seedhouse, P., "Interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective" (2004), Blackwell
  53. Sert, O., "The interactional management of claims of insufficient knowledge in English language classrooms", Language and Education, 27(6), pp.542~565 (2013)
  54. Sinclair, A. M., "Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils" (1975), Oxford University Press
  55. Stivers, T., "A preference for progressivity in interaction", Language in Society, 35, pp.367~392 (2006)
  56. Walsh, S., "Investigating classroom discourse" (2006), Routledge
  57. Waring, H. Z., "Moving out of IRF(Initiation-Response-Feedback) : A single case analysis", Language Learning, 59(4), pp.796~824 (2009)
  58. Waring, H. Z., "Learner initiatives and learning opportunities in the language classroom", Classroom Discourse, 2(2), pp.201~218 (2011)
  59. Waring, H. Z., "Yes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the language classroom", Language and Education, 26(5), pp.451~469 (2012)
  60. Zemel, A., "Pursuing a question : Reinitiating IRE sequences as a method of instruction", Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), pp.475~488 (2011)
  61. Zimmerman, D. H., "Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis", pp.3~21 (1991), Polity Press

관련 논문AI추천

Claims of Entitlements in Elementary EFL Co-teaching이미진한국영어교육학회 · 영어교육2021 · 제76권 제3호The Role of Third Turn Repeats in Korean EFL Classrooms박유정한국영어교육학회 · 영어교육2012 · 제67권 제3호Co-Teaching in a Primary EFL Classroom: An Ethnographic Perspective도주현언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2020 · 제94호The Machinery of Turn-taking in L2 Instructed Talk-in-interaction정은혁팬코리아영어교육학회 · 영어교육연구2009 · 제21권 제3호Teachers’ Discourse Identities and Learners’ Participation Opportunities in EFL Classroom Interaction: A Conversation Analytic StudyKhadije Aqajani Delavar, Sedigheh Karimpour, Zahra Zoleikani아시아테플 · Journal of Asia TEFL2020 · 제17권 제4호Opportunities for Learning: Teacher-Student and Student-Student Interaction in an Information Gap TaskSKUSEGEORGEEDWIN현대영어교육학회 · 현대영어교육2014 · 제15권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

EFL Learning Motivation and Influence of Private Education: Cross-grade Survey Results김태영pp. 25-46Are Different Types of Vocabulary Needed for Comprehending General and Academic Texts?문영선pp. 47-68Effects of Listeners’ Communicative Experiences in Thai English on the Intelligibility of Thai English김상기pp. 69-90Effective Applications of Automated Writing Feedback in Process-based Writing Instruction고원영pp. 91-118A Systemic Functional Study of Thematic Organization in the English Writing of Korean College StudentsYerahm Choung, 오선영pp. 119-144
원문 보기