본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

How EFL College Learners Perceive CBI Experience

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study examined EFL college-level learners’ perception toward the content-based instruction (CBI) by focusing on their participation in and expectation on the courses practiced in a strong form of CBI. Having analyzed the data collected from a questionnaire, observation and interview, the study found that the participants, 39 students who enrolled in two different CBI courses at a university in South Korea, put top priority on the enhancement of content-knowledge considering their CBI course as a content-course, not as a language-course. Second, the participants seemed to prefer participation opportunities induced by a required and prepared speaking task such as presentation through which they can practice a formal speech appropriate for their education experience and cognitive maturity. They also seemed to favor instructor-initiated interaction rather than being put into pair- or group-discussion between and among themselves. Third, the lack of participation was mainly attributed to the lack of understanding contents rather than lack of language skills. Based on the research findings, the study made suggestions on how to offer CBI courses more effectively for a particular group of EFL college-level learners who already earned basic interpersonal communication skills (BICS), yet to reach cognitive academic language proficiency (CALP).

Abstract

This study examined EFL college-level learners’ perception toward the content-based instruction (CBI) by focusing on their participation in and expectation on the courses practiced in a strong form of CBI. Having analyzed the data collected from a questionnaire, observation and interview, the study found that the participants, 39 students who enrolled in two different CBI courses at a university in South Korea, put top priority on the enhancement of content-knowledge considering their CBI course as a content-course, not as a language-course. Second, the participants seemed to prefer participation opportunities induced by a required and prepared speaking task such as presentation through which they can practice a formal speech appropriate for their education experience and cognitive maturity. They also seemed to favor instructor-initiated interaction rather than being put into pair- or group-discussion between and among themselves. Third, the lack of participation was mainly attributed to the lack of understanding contents rather than lack of language skills. Based on the research findings, the study made suggestions on how to offer CBI courses more effectively for a particular group of EFL college-level learners who already earned basic interpersonal communication skills (BICS), yet to reach cognitive academic language proficiency (CALP).

참고문헌 (92)

  1. Baker, C., "Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism" (2001), Multilingual Matters
  2. 방영주, "EFL College Students’ Perceptions toward Content-Based Learning", 현대영어교육, 14(1), pp.23~47 (2013), 현대영어교육학회
  3. Björklund, S., "Swedish immersion in the early years in Finland", International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17(2), pp.197~214 (2013)
  4. Bostwick, M., "Bilingual education", pp.125~138 (2001), TESOL
  5. Bradford, A., "English-medium instruction in Japanese higher Education: Policy, challenges and outcomes" (2017), Multilingual Matters
  6. Buns, A., "Action research: An evolving paradigm?", Language Teaching, 38, pp.57~74 (2005)
  7. Canagarajah, S., "Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan realities" (2013), Routledge
  8. Cenoz, J., "Content-based instruction and content-language integrated learning : The same or different? Language", Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), pp.8~24 (2015)
  9. Cenoz, J., "Learning through a second or additional language : Content-based instruction and CLIL in the twenty-first century. Language", Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), pp.1~7 (2015)
  10. Cenoz, J., "Critical analysis of CLIL : Taking stock and looking forward", Applied Linguistics, 35(3), pp.243~262 (2013)
  11. Coleman, J., "Forum on Englishmedium instruction", TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), pp.701~720 (2018)
  12. Crooks, G., "Values, philosophies, and beliefs in TESOL: Making a statement" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  13. Crystal, D., "English as a global language" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  14. Cummins, J., "Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy" (1984), Multilingual Matters
  15. Cummins, J., "Encyclopedia of language and education Vol. 2: Literacy", pp.71~83 (2008), Springer
  16. Cummins, J., "Reflections on Cummins (1980), The cross-lingual dimensions of language proficiency: Implications for bilingual education and the optimal age issue", TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), pp.940~944 (2016)
  17. Dalton-Puffer, C., "Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms", pp.279~291 (2010), John Benjamins
  18. Dearden, J., "English as a medium of instruction–A growing global phenomenon" (2014), British Council
  19. Derwing, T., "The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition", pp.246~259 (2017), Routledge
  20. Donato, R., "Vygotskian approaches to second language research", pp.33~56 (1994), Ablex
  21. Dörnyei, Z., "Research methods in applied linguistics" (2007), Oxford University Press
  22. Dörnyei, Z., "Teaching and researching motivation" (2011), Longman
  23. Dressler, C., "Developing literacy in second-language learners. Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth", pp.197~238 (2006), Lawrence Erlbaum
  24. Duff, P., "Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide", pp.95~116 (2012), Wiley-Blackwell
  25. Echevarría, J., "Making content comprehensible for English learners" (2004), Pearson
  26. Echevarría, J., "Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model" (2013), Pearson
  27. Flowerdew, j., "Research perspective on English for academic purpose" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  28. Genesee, F., "Handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism", pp.547~576 (2004), Blackwell
  29. Genesee, F., "Two case studies of content-based language education", Journal of Immersion and Content-based Language Education, 1, pp.3~33 (2013)
  30. Gorsuch, G., "Discipline-specific practice for international teaching assistants", English for Specific Purposes, 25, pp.90~108 (2005)
  31. Gorsuch, G., "International teaching assistants at universities : A research agenda", Language Teaching, 49(2), pp.275~290 (2016)
  32. Halbach, A., "Questions about basic interpersonal communication skills and cognitive language proficiency", Applied Linguistics, 33(5), pp.608~613 (2012)
  33. Harley, B., "Functional grammar in French immersion : A classroom experiment", Applied Linguistics, 10, pp.331~359 (1989)
  34. Harley, B., "Instructional strategies and SLA in early French immersion", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, pp.245~260 (1993)
  35. Hays, D., "Qualitative inquiry in clinical and educational settings" (2012), The Guilford Press
  36. Hultgren, A., "English-medium Instruction in European Higher Education", pp.1~16 (2015), Mouton
  37. Jong-BaiHwang, "L2 Learners’ Anxiety and Motivation in an English-Only Content-Based Class", 영어교육, 57(1), pp.193~211 (2002), 한국영어교육학회
  38. Jakonen, T., "Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom", Applied Linguistics, 36(1), pp.73~94 (2015)
  39. 정은혁, "Content-based Instruction from an Insider’s Perspective", Foreign Languages Education, 17(3), pp.141~170 (2010), 한국외국어교육학회
  40. 강애진, "What a TBI Case Offers to College-Level L2 Learners", 영어교육, 68(2), pp.3~27 (2013), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  41. 강애진, "Exploring How to Ensure Participation in CBI", 영어교과교육, 17(2), pp.1~27 (2018), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
  42. 강동호, "An exploratory study of university EFL students’ participation in CBI", 영어교육연구, 20(1), pp.19~40 (2008), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
  43. 강소연, "English as the Medium of Instruction in Korean Engineering Education", 응용언어학, 21(1), pp.155~174 (2005), 한국응용언어학회
  44. Kasper, L., "Content-based college ESL instruction" (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum
  45. Kim, Y., "The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition", pp.126~145 (2017), Routledge
  46. Knorr-Cetina, K., "The practice turn in contemporary theory", pp.175~188 (2010), Routledge
  47. Kohlberg, L., "Curriculum: An introduction to the field", pp.101~107 (1988), McCutchan Publishing
  48. Krashen, S., "The input hypothesis" (1985), Longman
  49. 김인영, "Students’ Perceptions of EMI in Higher Education in Korea", Journal of Asia TEFL, 11(2), pp.35~61 (2014), 아시아테플
  50. Leaver, B., "Developing professional-level language proficiency", pp.3~33 (2002), Cambridge University Press
  51. Lightbown, P., "How languages are learned" (2013), Oxford University Press
  52. Loewen, S., "Interaction and instructed second language acquisition", Language Teaching, 51(3), pp.285~329 (2018)
  53. Long, M., "Input in second language acquisition", pp.377~393 (1985), Newbury House
  54. Long, M., "Handbook of second language acquisition", pp.413~468 (1996), Academic Press
  55. Lyster, R., "The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition", pp.87~107 (2017), Routledge
  56. Macaro, E., "A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education", Language Teaching, 51(1), pp.36~76 (2018)
  57. Mackey, A., "The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition", pp.541~561 (2017), Routledge
  58. Macaro, E., "English medium instruction: Global views and countries in focus", Language Teaching, pp.1~18 (2017)
  59. Mackey, A., "Research methods in second language acquisition:A practical guide" (2012), Wiley-Blackwell
  60. EMILE the European dimension, "CLIL", pp.2002, Marsh, D.
  61. Marsh, D., "Encyclopedia of language and education, Vol 6: Knowledge about language", pp.233~246 (2008), Springer
  62. Mcpherrron, P., "English in the professional lives of college graduates in China", TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), pp.494~507 (2016)
  63. Met, M., "Learning language through content : Learning content through language", Foreign Languages Annals, 24, pp.281~295 (1991)
  64. Miller, L., "The Routledge handbook of language and professional communication", pp.304~320 (2017), Routledge
  65. EFL listening and speaking, "Teaching ESL", pp.2009, Nation, P.
  66. O’Donoghue, T., "Planning your qualitative research project: An introduction to interpretivist research in education" (2007), Routledge
  67. 오희정, "영어강의에 대한 대학생의 태도와 영어강의의 효과", 영어교육연구, 22(4), pp.211~229 (2010), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
  68. 박윤화, "A Study of University Students' Perceptions on TETE", 영어교육연구, 17(1), pp.59~82 (2005), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  69. Park, H., "The effectiveness of English mediated courses with engineering students", English Language Education, 33, pp.86~119 (2006)
  70. Pérez-Vidal, C., "CLIL across educational levels: Experiences from primary, secondary and tertiary contexts", pp.25~40 (2009), Richmond Publishing
  71. Pica, T., "Subject-matter content: How does it assist the interactional and linguistic needs of classroom language learners?", Modern Language Journal, 86(1), pp.1~19 (2002)
  72. Pica, T., "Contemporary applied linguistics: Language teaching and learning", pp.75~98 (2009), Continuum
  73. Plonsky, L., "The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition", pp.505~521 (2017), Routledge
  74. Riazi, A., "Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges", Language Teaching, 47(2), pp.135~173 (2014)
  75. Roquet, H., "Do productive skills improve in content and language integrated learning contexts? The case of writing", Applied Linguistics, 38(4), pp.489~511 (2017)
  76. Sanz, C., "Second language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts", pp.1~17 (2014), John Benjamins
  77. Seedhouse, P., "The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective" (2004), Blackwell
  78. Segalowitz, N., "The cognitive basis of second language fluency" (2010), Routledge
  79. Short, D., "How to integrate language and content instruction: A training manual" (1991), Center for Applied Linguistics
  80. Stryker, S., "Content-based instruction in foreign language education:Models and methods" (1997), Georgetown University Press
  81. Stoller, F., "Encyclopedia of language and education. Vol. 4: Second and foreign language education", pp.59~70 (2008), Springer
  82. Storch, N., "Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work", Language Learning, 52, pp.119~158 (2002)
  83. Swain, M., "Input in second language acquisition", pp.235~253 (1985), Newbury House
  84. Swain, M., "Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning", TESL Canada Journal, 6, pp.68~83 (1991)
  85. Swain, M., "Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning", pp.471~483 (2005), Routledge
  86. Tedick, D., "A review of research on content-based foreign", second language education in US K-12 contexts. Language, 2015, pp.28, 25~40
  87. Tomlinson, B., "The complete guide to the theory and practice of materials development for language learning" (2018), Wiley Blackwell
  88. VanPatten, B., "Key terms in second language acquisition" (2010), Continuum
  89. VanPattern, B., "Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction" (2015), Routledge
  90. Wächter, B., "English-taught programmes in European Higher Education: The state of play in 2014" (2014), ACA Papers on International Cooperation in Education
  91. Wen, Q., "The production-oriented approach to teaching university students English in China", Language Teaching, 51(4), pp.526~540 (2018)
  92. Wesche, M., "Language & content: Discipline- and content-based approaches to language study", pp.57~79 (1993), D. C. Heath and Company

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)