본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Contingencies in EFL Writing Tutors’ Third Turns: A Conversation Analytic Perspective

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Using conversation analysis (CA), this study examines the less explored languageteaching genre within an English as a foreign language (EFL) context: the writing center tutorials. Focusing the analysis specifically on tutor talk, this paper investigates the contingent production of third turns of second language (L2) tutors. Following the lead of Lee’s (2007) study of teachers’ third turns in classroom discourse, this study used CA to analyze audio-recorded tutoring sessions conducted in English. The analyses highlight five ways in which tutors make use of the third turn position in an IRF sequence to maneuver the tutorials, specifically contingent on the two types of student response in the second turn. Based on the analytic findings that illuminate the diverse functions of the tutors’ third turns, this study concludes with pedagogical implications for English-mediated writing center tutorials in EFL contexts.

Abstract

Using conversation analysis (CA), this study examines the less explored languageteaching genre within an English as a foreign language (EFL) context: the writing center tutorials. Focusing the analysis specifically on tutor talk, this paper investigates the contingent production of third turns of second language (L2) tutors. Following the lead of Lee’s (2007) study of teachers’ third turns in classroom discourse, this study used CA to analyze audio-recorded tutoring sessions conducted in English. The analyses highlight five ways in which tutors make use of the third turn position in an IRF sequence to maneuver the tutorials, specifically contingent on the two types of student response in the second turn. Based on the analytic findings that illuminate the diverse functions of the tutors’ third turns, this study concludes with pedagogical implications for English-mediated writing center tutorials in EFL contexts.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Allwright, D., "Focus on the language classroom: An introduction to classroom research for language teachers" (1991), Cambridge University Press
  2. Antaki, C., "Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk", pp.1~14 (2011), Palgrave Macmillan
  3. Cazden, C., "Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning" (2001), Heinmann
  4. Edwards, D., "Language, literacy and learning in educational practice" (1994), Multilingual Matters
  5. Ellis, R., "The study of second language acquisition" (2008), Oxford University Press
  6. Hall, J. K., "Differential teacher attention to student utterances : The construction of different opportunities for learning in the IRF", Linguistics and Education, 9, pp.287~311 (1998)
  7. Heritage, J., "Garfinkel and ethnomethodology" (1984), Polity Press
  8. Hutchby, I., "Conversation analysis" (1998), Polity Press
  9. Jefferson, G., "Structures of social action" (1984), Cambridge University Press
  10. Jung, H., "Focus group interaction in Korean EFL teacher development program", doctor, pp.2015
  11. Kääntä, L., "Teachers’ embodied allocations in instructional interaction", Classroom Discourse, 3(2), pp.166~186 (2012)
  12. Koole, T., "The encyclopedia of applied linguistics", pp.977~982 (2012), Blackwell Publications
  13. Lee, J. R. E., "Ethnomethodology and human sciences", pp.196~226 (1991), Cambridge University Press
  14. Lee, J., "Teacher entries into second turn positions : IRFs in collaborative teaching", Journal of Pragmatics, 95, pp.1~15 (2016)
  15. Lee, Y. A., "Third turn position in teacher talk : Contingency and the work of teaching", Journal of Pragmatics, 39, pp.180~226 (2007)
  16. Lee, Y. A., "Yes-no questions in the third-turn position: Pedagogical discourse processes", Discourse Process, 45(3), pp.237~262 (2008)
  17. Macbeth, D., "Hugh Mehan’s"Learning lessons"reconsidered : On the differences between the naturalistic and critical analysis of classroom discourse", American Educational Research Journal, 40, pp.239~280 (2003)
  18. Mehan, H., "Learning lessons: The social organization of classroom behavior" (1979), Harvard University Press
  19. Mercer, N., "Thinking voices:The work of the national oracy project", pp.215~223 (1992), Hodder &Stoughton
  20. Nassaji, H., "What's the use of 'Triadic dialogue'? : An investigation of teacher-student interaction", Applied Linguistics, 21, pp.376~406 (2000)
  21. 박용해, "The Use of Questions in EFL Writing Tutorial Discourse", 담화와 인지, 14(2), pp.73~98 (2007), 담화·인지언어학회
  22. Sacks, H., "A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking in conversation", Language, 50, pp.696~735 (1974)
  23. Schegloff, E. A., "Conversation analysis and applied linguistics", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, pp.3~31 (2002)
  24. Schegloff, E. A., "Sequence organization" (2007), Cambridge University Press
  25. Sinclair, J., "Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils" (1975), Oxford University Press
  26. ten Have, P., "Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide" (1999), Sage Publications
  27. Thonus, T., "Tutors as teachers : Assisting ESL", EFL students in the writing center, 1993, pp.13, 13~26
  28. Thonus, T., "What are the differences? Tutor interactions with first-and secondlanguage writers", Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, pp.227~242 (2004)
  29. Waring, H. Z., "The multi-functionality of accounts in advice giving", Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11, pp.367~391 (2007)
  30. Waring, H. Z., "Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom : IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities", Modern Language Journal, 92(4), pp.577~594 (2008)
  31. Waring, H. Z., "Moving out of IRF : A single case analysis", Language Learning, 59(4), pp.796~824 (2009)
  32. Waring, H. Z., ""Any questions?"Investigating the nature of understandingchecks in the language classroom", TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), pp.722~752 (2012)
  33. Weigle, S., "Novice tutors and their ESL tutees : Three case studies of tutor roles and perceptions of tutorial success", Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, pp.203~225 (2004)
  34. Wells, G., "Reevaluating the IRF sequence : A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom", Linguistics and Education, 5, pp.1~37 (1993)
  35. Williams, J., "Institutional talk and interlanguage pragmatics research", pp.37~65 (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  36. Young, R., "Critical theory and classroom talk" (1992), Multilingual Matters
  37. Young, V. H., "Politeness phenomena in the university writing conference", Doctor, pp.1992

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)