Relative Effects of Direct Focused and Unfocused WCF on the Accuracy Development of Two Language Forms
4
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article reports on a classroom-based study that examined the effects of direct focused and unfocused written corrective feedback (WCF) on the accuracy development of the past hypothetical conditional (e.g., If I had had money, I would have bought a new computer.) and the indefinite article (a/an). The study employed a pretest-posttest-delayed posttest design with two feedback treatment sessions. Six intermediate classes, a total of 108 college freshmen at a university in Korea and two native English speaking instructors, participated in the study. The classes were assigned into a focused WCF group, an unfocused WCF group, and a control group. A text-reconstruction task was used as a writing material and a test instrument. The results revealed that both focused and unfocused WCF groups outperformed the control group in the accuracy gains of both target forms. When the relative effects of two types of feedback were considered, there was no difference in the contribution focused and unfocused WCF made for the accuracy improvement of the hypothetical conditional. However, focused WCF was more beneficial than unfocused WCF for the development of the indefinite article.
Abstract
This article reports on a classroom-based study that examined the effects of direct focused and unfocused written corrective feedback (WCF) on the accuracy development of the past hypothetical conditional (e.g., If I had had money, I would have bought a new computer.) and the indefinite article (a/an). The study employed a pretest-posttest-delayed posttest design with two feedback treatment sessions. Six intermediate classes, a total of 108 college freshmen at a university in Korea and two native English speaking instructors, participated in the study. The classes were assigned into a focused WCF group, an unfocused WCF group, and a control group. A text-reconstruction task was used as a writing material and a test instrument. The results revealed that both focused and unfocused WCF groups outperformed the control group in the accuracy gains of both target forms. When the relative effects of two types of feedback were considered, there was no difference in the contribution focused and unfocused WCF made for the accuracy improvement of the hypothetical conditional. However, focused WCF was more beneficial than unfocused WCF for the development of the indefinite article.
참고문헌 (54)
- Ashwell, T., "Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), pp.227~257 (2000)
- Benson, S., "Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy", Language Teaching Research, 23(6), pp.702~726 (2019)
- Bitchener, J., "Evidence in support of written corrective feedback", Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), pp.69~124 (2008)
- Bitchener, J., "A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CF", Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), pp.348~363 (2012)
- Bitchener, J., "Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing" (2012), Routledge
- Bitchener, J., "The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students", Language Teaching Research, 12(3), pp.409~431 (2008)
- Bitchener, J., "The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development : A ten month investigation", Applied Linguistics, 31(2), pp.193~214 (2010)
- Bitchener, J., "The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), pp.191~205 (2005)
- Bonilla López, M., "The Differential effects of comprehensive feedback forms in the second language writing class", Language Learning, 68(3), pp.813~850 (2018)
- EFL teacher’s course, "The grammar book: An ESL", pp.1999, Celce-Murcia, M.
- Cohen, J., "Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences" (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Diab, N., "Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?", Assessing Writing, 24(1), pp.16~34 (2015)
- Ellis, R., "At the interface : Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), pp.305~352 (2005)
- Ellis, R., "Modeling learning difficulty and second language proficiency : The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge", Applied Linguistics, 27(3), pp.431~463 (2006)
- Ellis, R., "The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context", System, 36(3), pp.353~371 (2008)
- Ferris, D., "The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes : A response to Truscott(1996)", Journal of second language writing, 8(1), pp.1~11 (1999)
- Ferris, D., "The"grammar correction"debate in L2 writing : Where are we, and where do we go from here?(and what do we do in the meantime…?)", Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), pp.49~62 (2004)
- Ferris, D., "Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA : Intersections and practical applications", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), pp.181~201 (2010)
- Ferris, D., "Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing studies", Language Teaching, 45(4), pp.446~459 (2012)
- Frear, D., "The effect of written corrective feedback and revision on intermediate Chinese learners’ acquisition of English", doctoral, pp.2012
- Frear, D., "The effect of focused and unfocused indirect written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ accuracy in new pieces of writing", System, 53(1), pp.24~34 (2015)
- Izumi, S., "Testing the output hypothesis : Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(3), pp.421~452 (1999)
- Kang, E., "The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2written accuracy : A meta‐analysis", Modern Language Journal, 99(1), pp.1~18 (2015)
- Khaled Karim, "The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students’ writing", Language Teaching Research, pp.136216881880246~ (2018), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Kim, J. H., "Written corrective feedback : Effects, types of errors, and types of strategies", Foreign Language Education, 17(1), pp.1~30 (2010)
- Ji Hyun Kim, "The relative effect of recasts on L2 Korean learners’ accuracy development of two different forms and its relationship with language analytic ability", Language Teaching Research, pp.136216881985991~ (2019), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- 김지현, "The Editing and Learning Effects of Direct and Indirect Comprehensive WCF on L2 Grammar Accuracy Development", 외국어교육연구, 33(2), pp.375~401 (2019), 외국어교육연구소[DOI]
- Ko, H., "The handbook of east Asian psycholinguistics Vol. 3", pp.286~304 (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Kormos, J., "The role of individual differences in L2 writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), pp.390~403 (2012)
- Lalande, J., "Reducing composition errors : An experiment", Modern Language Journal, 66(2), pp.140~149 (1982)
- Li, S., "The interface between feedback type, L2 proficiency, and the nature of the linguistic target", Language Teaching Research, 18(3), pp.373~396 (2014)
- Li, S., "The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition : A meta-analytic review of five decades of research", Applied Linguistics, 36(3), pp.385~408 (2015)
- Li, S., "Individual differences, L2 development, and language program administration: From theory to application", pp.32~52 (2015), Cengage
- Loewen, S., "The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition", pp.24~40 (2012), Routledge
- Loewen, S., "Key concepts in second language acquisition" (2011), Palgrave Macmillan
- Pienemann, M., "Language processing and language development: Processability theory" (1998), John Benjamins
- Robb, T., "Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality", TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), pp.83~96 (1986)
- Robinson, P., "The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition", pp.247~267 (2012), Routledge
- Schmidt, R., "Awareness and second language acquisition", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), pp.206~226 (1993)
- Shintani, N., "The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article", Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), pp.286~306 (2013)
- Shintani, N., "Effects of written feedback and revision on learners’ accuracy in using two English grammatical structures", Language Learning, 63(1), pp.103~131 (2014)
- Sheen, Y., "Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings", Language Teaching Research, 8(3), pp.263~300 (2004)
- Sheen, Y., "The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles", TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), pp.255~283 (2007)
- Sheen, Y., "Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners", System, 37(4), pp.556~569 (2009)
- Sommers, N., "Responding to student writing", College Composition and Communication, 33(2), pp.148~156 (1982)
- Stefanou, C., "Direct written corrective feedback, learner differences, and the acquisition of second language article use for generic and specific plural reference", Modern Language Journal, 99(2), pp.263~282 (2015)
- Storch, N., "Critical feedback on written corrective feedback research", International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), pp.29~46 (2010)
- Truscott, J., "The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes", Language Learning, 46(2), pp.327~369 (1996)
- Truscott. J., "Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction : A response to Chandler", Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), pp.337~343 (2004)
- Truscott, J., "Error correction, revision, and learning", Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), pp.292~305 (2008)
- VanPatten, B., "Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary" (2004), Routledge
- van Beuningen, C. G., "The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners’ written accuracy", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, pp.279~296 (2008)
- van Beunungen, G., "Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing", Language Learning, 62(1), pp.1~41 (2012)
- Young, R., "Second language acquisition and linguistic variation", pp.135~175 (1996), John Benjamins
