Interactional Effects of Feedback Type and Target Structure on Accuracy in L2 Writing
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examined whether the efficacy of written corrective feedback (CF) on grammatical accuracy of L2 learners’ writing is contingent upon interaction between its type and complexity of its target structure. Written CF types in focus were direct CF and indirect CF. The English articles and the hypothetical conditional were taken as relatively less and more complex structure respectively. One hundred fifty-seven Korean university learners of English formed six groups. Three groups assigned for each target structure comprised one control group and two treatment groups that received direct CF or indirect CF. The participants performed dictogloss on four occasions and writing from the first, the third, and the fourth occasions constituted pretest, immediate posttest, and delayed posttest respectively. The results showed that there were interactional effects. While direct CF improved learners’ accuracy of both target structures, indirect CF worked favorably only for the hypothetical conditional. Improved accuracy through written CF was retained over time for the articles but such endurance did not emerge for the hypothetical conditional. (167 words)
Abstract
This study examined whether the efficacy of written corrective feedback (CF) on grammatical accuracy of L2 learners’ writing is contingent upon interaction between its type and complexity of its target structure. Written CF types in focus were direct CF and indirect CF. The English articles and the hypothetical conditional were taken as relatively less and more complex structure respectively. One hundred fifty-seven Korean university learners of English formed six groups. Three groups assigned for each target structure comprised one control group and two treatment groups that received direct CF or indirect CF. The participants performed dictogloss on four occasions and writing from the first, the third, and the fourth occasions constituted pretest, immediate posttest, and delayed posttest respectively. The results showed that there were interactional effects. While direct CF improved learners’ accuracy of both target structures, indirect CF worked favorably only for the hypothetical conditional. Improved accuracy through written CF was retained over time for the articles but such endurance did not emerge for the hypothetical conditional. (167 words)
참고문헌 (33)
- Ashwell, T., "Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), pp.227~258 (2000)
- Bitchener, J., "Evidence in support of written corrective feedback", Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), pp.102~118 (2008)
- Bitchener, J., "The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development : A ten month investigation", Applied Linguistics, 31(2), pp.193~214 (2010)
- Bitchener, J., "The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), pp.191~205 (2005)
- Bruton, A., "Another reply to Truscott on error correction : Improved situated designs over statistics", System, 38(3), pp.491~498 (2010)
- Celce-Murcia, M., "The grammar book" (1999), Heinle & Heinle
- Chandler, J., "The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), pp.267~296 (2003)
- Chandler, J., "A response to Truscott", Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), pp.345~348 (2004)
- Cohen, J., "A power primer", Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), pp.155~159 (1992)
- Ellis, R., "A typology of written corrective feedback types", ELT Journal, 63(2), pp.97~107 (2009)
- Ellis, R., "The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context", System, 36(3), pp.353~371 (2008)
- Ferris, D. R., "The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes : A response to Truscott(1996)", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), pp.1~11 (1999)
- Ferris, D. R., "Response to student writing implications for second language students" (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Ferris, D. R., "The"grammar correction"debate in L2 writing : Where we are, and where do we go from here?(And what do we do in the meantime …?)", Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), pp.49~62 (2004)
- Ferris, D. R., "Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues", pp.81~104 (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Ferris, D. R., "Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), pp.161~184 (2001)
- Frear, D., "The effect of written corrective feedback and revision on intermediate Chinese learners’ acquisition of English", doctoral, pp.2012
- Izumi, S., "Testing the output hypothesis : Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(3), pp.421~452 (1999)
- Lalande, J. F., "Reducing composition errors : An experiment", Modern Language Journal, 66(2), pp.140~149 (1982)
- Li, S., "The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA : A meta-analysis", Language Learning, 60(2), pp.309~365 (2010)
- Pica, T., "Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes?", Language Learning, 44(3), pp.493~527 (1994)
- Schmidt, R., "Awareness and second language acquisition", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, pp.206~226 (1993)
- Schmidt, R., "Attention and awareness in foreign language learning" (1995), University of Hawai’i Press
- Sheen, Y., "The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles", TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), pp.255~283 (2007)
- Shintani, N., "The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and meta-linguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article", Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), pp.286~306 (2013)
- Shintani, N., "Effects of written feedback and revision on learners’ accuracy in using two English grammatical structures", Language Learning, 64(1), pp.103~131 (2014)
- Spada, N., "Interactions between type of instruction and type of target feature : A meta-analysis", Language Learning, 60(2), pp.263~308 (2010)
- Truscott, J., "The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes", Language Learning, 46(2), pp.327~369 (1996)
- Truscott, J., "The case for"the case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes" : A response to Ferris", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), pp.111~122 (1999)
- Truscott, J., "The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately", Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), pp.255~272 (2007)
- Truscott, J., "Error correction, revision, and learning", Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), pp.292~305 (2008)
- van Beuningen, C., "Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing", Language Learning, 62(1), pp.1~41 (2012)
- Vyatkina, N., "The effectiveness of written corrective feedback in teaching beginning German", Foreign Language Annals, 43(4), pp.671~689 (2010)