본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Some Observations on the PA/SN Distinction of But

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

In relevance theory, it is claimed that the adversative connective but encodes a procedural meaning to guide the hearer to the intended interpretation. It is also claimed that this unitary semantics of but can accommodate the various interpretations of but, including interpretations such as the denial of expectation and correction. However, in languages such as Spanish, German and Korean, the two interpretations are encoded by different lexical items, which are referred to as PA- and SN-type conjunctions, respectively. These conjunctions and the corresponding English but-constructions are claimed to be sensitive to different types of implicature and negation. Because of these differences, in some theories, the denial of expectation but and the correction but are claimed to be different meanings of but. This paper closely examines these claims and argues that they do not support the ambiguity of but, thereby maintaining the unitary semantics of but.

Abstract

In relevance theory, it is claimed that the adversative connective but encodes a procedural meaning to guide the hearer to the intended interpretation. It is also claimed that this unitary semantics of but can accommodate the various interpretations of but, including interpretations such as the denial of expectation and correction. However, in languages such as Spanish, German and Korean, the two interpretations are encoded by different lexical items, which are referred to as PA- and SN-type conjunctions, respectively. These conjunctions and the corresponding English but-constructions are claimed to be sensitive to different types of implicature and negation. Because of these differences, in some theories, the denial of expectation but and the correction but are claimed to be different meanings of but. This paper closely examines these claims and argues that they do not support the ambiguity of but, thereby maintaining the unitary semantics of but.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Anscombre, Jean Claude, "Deux mais en Francais?", Lingua, (43), pp.23~40 (1977)
  2. Blakemore, Diane, "Semantic constraints on relevance" (1987), Blackwell
  3. Blakemore, Diane, "Denial and contrast: A relevance theoretic analysis of but", Linguistics and Philosophy, (12), pp.15~37 (1989)
  4. Blakemore, Diane, "Indicators and procedures: Nevertheless and but", Journal of Linguistics, (36), pp.463~486 (2000)
  5. Blakemore, Diane, "Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  6. Blakemore, Diane, "Discourse markers. The handbook of pragmatics", pp.221~240 (2004), Blackwell
  7. Burton-Roberts, Noel, "On Horn's dilemma: Presupposition and negation", Journal of Linguistics, (25), pp.95~125 (1989)
  8. Carston, Robyn, "Metalinguistic negation and echoic use", Journal of Pragmatics, (25), pp.309~330 (1996)
  9. Chapman, Siobhan, "Some observations on metalinguistic negation", Journal of Linguistics, (32), pp.387~402 (1996)
  10. Choi, Yoonhee, "The metalinguistic negational SN discourse markers: With reference to their function of refuting in Korean dialogue (in Korean)", Discourse and Cognition, 15(2), pp.163~190 (2008)
  11. Dascal, Marcelo, "Between semantics and pragmatics: The two types of but-Hebrew aval and ela", Theoretical Linguistics, 4, pp.143~172 (1977)
  12. Grice, H. Paul, "Logic and conversation", Syntax and semantics, 3, pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
  13. Grice, H. Paul, "Studies in the way of words" (1989), Harvard University Press
  14. Hall, Alison, "Do discourse connectives encode concepts or procedures?", Lingua, (1117), pp.149~174 (2007)
  15. Horn, Laurence, "Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. Meaning, form, and use in context", pp.11~42 (1984), Georgetown University Press
  16. Horn, Laurence, "Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity", Language, (61), pp.121~174 (1985)
  17. Horn, Laurence, "A natural history of negation" (1989), University of Chicago Press
  18. Iten, Corrine, "Linguistic meaning, truth-conditions and relevance" (2005), Palgrave Macmillan
  19. Koenig, Jean-Pierre, "Meaning and context: German aber and sondern. Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap", pp.365~386 (1998), CSLI Publications
  20. Lee, Chungmin, "Implicature and presupposition: From polarity and contrastive topic", Paper presented at the 2004 Linguistic Society of Korea International Conference (2004)
  21. focus and polarity in discourse. Where semantics meets pragmatics, "Contrastive topic", pp.2006, Lee, Chungmin
  22. Lee, Hye-kyung, "The PA", SN distinction in Korean, 2005, pp.41(4), 807~827
  23. Noh, Eun-Ju, "Metarepresentation: A relevance theory" (2000), Benjamins
  24. Olmost, Susana, "Contrast and propositional attitude: A relevance theoretic analysis of contrast connectives in Spanish and English", Lingua, (199), pp.51~66 (2009)
  25. Schwenter, Scott, "Discourse markers and the PA", SN distinction, 2002, pp.(38), 43~69

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)