본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Reframing Task Condition: Repeating L1-L2 Writing and L2 Writing Performance

이종봉|좌수민|허명혜
한국영어교육학회 (Korea Association Of Teachers Of English)|2020.06|영어교육 (English Teaching)|제75권 제2호|pp. 3-19

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

TBLTtask conditiontask repetitionL1/L2 writingKorean EFL high school students
주제분류영어와문학

초록

We examined the role of L1 writing on L2 writing performance by repeating the same topic twice through L1 writing first and L2 writing later. We designed what we call a ‘L1 + L2 writing task’ and a ‘L2-only writing task’ respectively. In the L1 + L2 writing task, students wrote a text in their L1, and wrote the same topic in L2, by removing the initial L1 essay. We focused on validating which task conditions (± L1 writing) account for the variation in linguistic performance in EFL high-school students’ writing. Our study was conducted with two intact classes (n = 60) assigned to the L2-only, and students from the other two classes (n = 60) assigned to the L1 + L2. The findings indicate that L1 writing may push students to direct their attentional resources toward effective text construction, thereby mitigating a large number of simultaneous demands on attention. We add to empirical knowledge on the effects of L1 writing in task repetition, by exploring how task repetition affected our students’ L2 writing performance.

Abstract

We examined the role of L1 writing on L2 writing performance by repeating the same topic twice through L1 writing first and L2 writing later. We designed what we call a ‘L1 + L2 writing task’ and a ‘L2-only writing task’ respectively. In the L1 + L2 writing task, students wrote a text in their L1, and wrote the same topic in L2, by removing the initial L1 essay. We focused on validating which task conditions (± L1 writing) account for the variation in linguistic performance in EFL high-school students’ writing. Our study was conducted with two intact classes (n = 60) assigned to the L2-only, and students from the other two classes (n = 60) assigned to the L1 + L2. The findings indicate that L1 writing may push students to direct their attentional resources toward effective text construction, thereby mitigating a large number of simultaneous demands on attention. We add to empirical knowledge on the effects of L1 writing in task repetition, by exploring how task repetition affected our students’ L2 writing performance.

참고문헌 (60)

  1. Abdel Latif, M. M. M., "What do we mean by writing fluency and how can it be validly measured?", Applied Linguistics, 34(1), pp.99~105 (2013)
  2. Alderson, J. C., "Test review : Test of English as a foreign language™ : Internet-based test(TOEFL iBT®)", Language Testing, 26(4), pp.621~631 (2009)
  3. Baayen, R. H., "CELEX" (1996), Linguistic Data Consortium
  4. Beare, S., "Writing and cognition: Research and applications", pp.151~161 (2007), Elsevier
  5. Bygate, M., "Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing", pp.23~48 (2001), Routledge
  6. Bygate, M., "Second language task complexity. Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance", pp.xi~xii (2011), John Benjamins
  7. Centeno‐Cortés, B., "Problem-solving tasks in a foreign language : The importance of the L1 in private verbal thinking", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), pp.7~35 (2004)
  8. Cohen, A. D., "Research on direct versus translated writing : Students’strategies and their results", The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), pp.169~188 (2001)
  9. Cohen, J., "Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences" (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum
  10. Connor, U., "Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom", pp.126~139 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  11. Crossley, S. A., "Using latent semantic analysis to explore second language lexical development", Proceeding of the 21st International Florida Artificial Intelligence ResearchSociety, pp.136~141 (2008), The AAAI Press
  12. Crossley, S. A., "The development of polysemy and frequency use in English second language speakers", Language Learning, 60(3), pp.573~605 (2010)
  13. Crossley, S. A., "Predicting the proficiency level of language learners using lexical indices", Language Testing, 29(2), pp.240~260 (2012)
  14. Fayol, M., "Translation of thought to written text while composing. Advancing theory, knowledge, research, methods, tools, and applications", pp.3~14 (2012), Psychology Press
  15. Flower, L., "A cognitive process theory of writing", College Composition and Communication, 32(4), pp.365~387 (1981)
  16. Friedlander, A., "Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom", pp.109~125 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  17. Harklau, L., "The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition", Journal of Second Language Writing, 11(4), pp.329~350 (2002)
  18. Hayes, 1. R., "Cognitive processes in writing", pp.31~50 (1980), Erlbaum
  19. Jarvis, S., "Cross-disciplinary advances in applied natural language processing: Issues and approaches", pp.50~72 (2012), IGI Global
  20. Kellogg, R. T., "The science of writing", pp.57~71 (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum
  21. Kellogg, R. T., "The cognitive demands of writing: Processing capacity and working memory effects in text production", pp.43~61 (1999), Amsterdam University Press
  22. Knight, T., "Learning vocabulary through sharedspeaking tasks", The Language Teacher, 20(1), pp.24~29 (1996)
  23. Knutson, E. M., "Thinking in English, writing in French", The French Review, 80(1), pp.88~109 (2006)
  24. Kobayashi, H., "Effects of first languageon second language writing : Translation versus direct composition", Language Learning, 42(2), pp.183~215 (1992)
  25. Kormos, J., "Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance", Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), pp.148~161 (2011)
  26. Lay, N. D. S., "Composing processes of adult ESL learners : A case study", TESOL Quarterly, 16(3), pp.406~407 (1982)
  27. Lameta-Tufuga, E., "Using the Samoan language for academic learning tasks", Master, pp.1994
  28. Landauer, T. K., "Handbook of latent semantic analysis" (2007), Lawrence Erlbaum
  29. Malvern, D., "Lexical diversity and language development" (2004), Palgrave Macmillan
  30. Macaro, E., "Task-based language learning insights from and for L2 writing", pp.53~77 (2014), John Benjamins
  31. Manchón, R. M., "Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language", pp.61~82 (2011), John Benjamins
  32. Manchón, R. M., "Debates in modern languages education(", pp.116~127 (2014), Routledge
  33. Manchón, R. M., "Lexical retrieval processes and strategies insecond language writing : A synthesis of empirical research", International Journal of English Studies, 7(2), pp.149~174 (2007)
  34. Manchón, R. M., "Intercultural language use and language learning", pp.101~121 (2007), Springer
  35. Manchón, R. M., "Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research", pp.102~129 (2009), Multilingual Matters
  36. McCarthy, P. M., "An assessment of the RANGE and usefulness of lexical diversity measures and thepotential of the measure of textual, lexical diversity(MTLD)", Doctor, pp.2005
  37. McCarthy, P. M., "MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D : A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment", Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), pp.381~392 (2010)
  38. McCarthy, P. M., "Computational replication of human paraphrase assessment", Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International FLAIRS Conference, pp.266~271 (2009), AAAI Press
  39. McCutchen, D., "Knowledge, processing, and working memory : Implications for a theory of writing", Educational Psychologist, 35(1), pp.13~23 (2000)
  40. Nitta, R., "Task-based language learning insights from and for L2 writing", pp.107~136 (2014), John Benjamins
  41. Norris, J., "L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives", pp.221~244 (2012), de Gruyter Mouton
  42. Qi, D. S., "An inquiry into language-switching in second language composing processes", The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(3), pp.413~435 (1998)
  43. Robinson, P., "Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production : Exploring interactions in a componential framework", Applied Linguistics, 22(1), pp.27~57 (2001)
  44. Robinson, P., "Re-thinking-for-speaking and L2 task demands: The cognition hypothesis, task classification, and sequencing", Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Task-based Language Teaching, pp.20~22 (2007), John Benjamins
  45. Robinson, P., "Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance", pp.3~37 (2011), John Benjamins
  46. Ruiz-Funes, M., "Task-based language learning insights from and for L2 writing", pp.163~192 (2014), John Benjamins
  47. Sasaki, M., "Explanatory variables forEFL students’expository writing", Language Learning, 46(1), pp.137~174 (1996)
  48. Scott, V. M., "Rethinking foreign language writing" (1996), Heinle & Heinle
  49. Skehan, P., "A cognitive approach to language learning" (1998), Oxford University Press
  50. Skehan, P., "Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing", pp.167~186 (2001), Longman
  51. Skehan, P., "Task-based instruction", Language Teaching, 36(1), pp.1~14 (2003)
  52. Skehan, P., "Cognition and second language instruction", pp.183~205 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  53. Schoonen, R., "First language and second language writing : The role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing, and metacognitive knowledge", Language Learning, 53(1), pp.165~202 (2003)
  54. Terry, R. M., "Teaching and evaluating writing as a communicative skill", Foreign Language Annals, 22(1), pp.43~54 (1989)
  55. van Gelderen, A., "Revision cognitive and instructional processes", pp.103~123 (2004), Kluwer
  56. VanPatten, B., "Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary", pp.5~31 (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum
  57. van Weijen, D., "L1 use during L2 writing : An empirical study of a complex phenomenon", Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(4), pp.235~250 (2009)
  58. Wang, L., "Switching tofirst language among writers with differing second-language proficiency", Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), pp.347~375 (2003)
  59. Wang, W., "L1 use in the L2 composing process : An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers", Journal of Second Language Writing, 11(3), pp.225~246 (2002)
  60. Woodall, B. R., "Language-switching : Using the first language while writing in a second", Journal of Second Language Writing, 11(1), pp.7~28 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

The Role of Korean EFL Writers’ L1 in L2 Writing: Performance and Process박혜숙, 이호정대한영어영문학회 · 영어영문학연구2018 · 제44권 제3호Effects of Task Complexity on L2 Writing Processes and Linguistic Complexity: A Keystroke Logging Study정주경한국영어교육학회 · 영어교육2017 · 제72권 제4호Effects of Pre-writing in L1 and L2 on Narrative Writing of 6 Korean College Students김숙현언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2009 · 제48호Mediation Through the First Language During the Second Language Writing: A Sociocultural Approach이나라, 이양숙, 허명혜한국영어교육학회 · 영어교육2013 · 제68권 제1호L2 Writers’ Use of Languaging as a Self-scaffolding Tool: Processes, Reflection, and L2 Proficiency김지현외국어교육연구소 · 외국어교육연구2022 · 제36권 제3호The Contributions of Planning, L2 Linguistic Knowledge and Individual Differences to L2 Writing문영인, 오은주, 이종민아시아테플 · Journal of Asia TEFL2015 · 제12권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

Two Approaches to Second Language Acquisition: Universal Grammar and Emergentism김기택, William O’Gradypp. 3-8Effects of Written Corrective Feedback on the Use of the English Indefinite Article in EFL Learners’ Writing이정원, 윤경옥pp. 21-40Effects of Audiobooks on EFL Learners’ Reading Development: Focus on Fluency and MotivationBotagoz Tusmagambetpp. 41-67Testing Usage-Based Approaches to Assessing EFL Learners’ Development of English Argument Structure Constructions김현우, 나양온, 황혜림pp. 55-78Teaching activities and students’ preferences in integrated college English reading and writing classes.남은희, 성명희pp. 69-91
원문 보기