L2 Learners’ Cognitive and Behavioral Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between students’ cognitive engagement with written corrective feedback (WCF) and their revision behavior. Based on the assumption that different levels of cognitive involvement are linked to learners’ use of the feedback, we investigated how different post-feedback activities (i.e., reading, copying, and explaining the feedback) would affect second language writers’ behavioral engagement with WCF during the revision phase. Ninety-eight students were divided into three experimental groups and one control group. Experimental groups performed one of the three post-feedback activities before revising their original writing. The participants’ revision behavior was examined by their uptake of WCF. Additionally, the change in writing quality between the first and the revised drafts was investigated. Results showed that activities that promote deeper cognitive processing generally led to higher uptake of WCF in revision. The effects of post-feedback activities, however, varied for error types. All the post-feedback activities were effective in improving the quality of writing.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between students’ cognitive engagement with written corrective feedback (WCF) and their revision behavior. Based on the assumption that different levels of cognitive involvement are linked to learners’ use of the feedback, we investigated how different post-feedback activities (i.e., reading, copying, and explaining the feedback) would affect second language writers’ behavioral engagement with WCF during the revision phase. Ninety-eight students were divided into three experimental groups and one control group. Experimental groups performed one of the three post-feedback activities before revising their original writing. The participants’ revision behavior was examined by their uptake of WCF. Additionally, the change in writing quality between the first and the revised drafts was investigated. Results showed that activities that promote deeper cognitive processing generally led to higher uptake of WCF in revision. The effects of post-feedback activities, however, varied for error types. All the post-feedback activities were effective in improving the quality of writing.
참고문헌 (25)
- Bitchener, J., "The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback", System, 37(2), pp.322~329 (2009)
- Chandler, J., "The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), pp.267~296 (2003)
- Ellis, R., "A typology of written corrective feedback types", ELT Journal, 63(2), pp.97~107 (2009)
- Ellis, R., "A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), pp.335~349 (2010)
- Ellis, R., "The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context", System, 36(3), pp.353~371 (2008)
- Ferris, D., "Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), pp.181~201 (2010)
- Frear, D., "The effect of focused and unfocused indirect written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ accuracy in new pieces of writing", System, 53, pp.24~34 (2015)
- Guénette, D., "Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1), pp.40~53 (2007)
- Han, Y., "Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom", Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, pp.31~44 (2015)
- Hyland, F., "Focusing on form : Student engagement with teacher feedback", System, 31(2), pp.217~230 (2003)
- Lee, G., "Constructing trust between teacher and students through feedback and revision cycles in an EFL writing classroom", Written Communication, 25(4), pp.506~537 (2008)
- Moradian, M. R., "Contribution of written languaging to enhancing the efficiency of written corrective feedback", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(2), pp.406~426 (2017)
- Qi, D. S., "Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task", Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), pp.277~303 (2001)
- Sachs, R., "Learners’ uses of two types of written corrective feedback on a L2 writing revision task", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(1), pp.67~100 (2007)
- Sheen, Y., "The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles", TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), pp.255~283 (2007)
- Storch, N., "Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), pp.303~334 (2010)
- Suzuki, W., "Written languaging, direct correction, and second language writing revision", Language Learning, 62(4), pp.1110~1133 (2012)
- Swain, M., "Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky", pp.95~108 (2006), Continuum
- "Jamovi (Version 1.6)" (2021)[URL]
- Truscott, J., "The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes", Language Learning, 46(2), pp.327~369 (1996)
- Van Beuningen, C. G., "Evidence on the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Error Correction in Second Language Writing", Language Learning, 62(1), pp.1~41 (2012)
- Williams, J., "The potential role(s)of writing in second language development", Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), pp.321~331 (2012)
- Zhang, S., "Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), pp.209~222 (1995)
- Zheng, Y., "Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing : A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students", Assessing Writing, 37, pp.13~24 (2018)
- Yao Zheng, "Understanding individual differences in lower-proficiency students’ engagement with teacher written corrective feedback", Teaching in Higher Education, pp.1~21 (2020), Informa UK Limited[DOI]