CEFR 기반 2015 개정 교육과정, 교과서, 수능의 일관성: 영어 읽기를 중심으로
Consistency of 2015 revised national curriculum, textbooks, and CSAT according to CEFR levels: Focusing on English reading passages.
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research investigated consistency of achievement levels stated in the 2015 revised national curriculum of English, high school English textbooks, and the Korean College Scholastic Ability Test (CSAT) according to CEFR Levels. Based on CEFR levels, this study compared levels of targeted achievement standards in the national curriculum, focusing on reading passages in High School EnglishⅡ and CSAT implemented for three consecutive years (2021-2023). Results indicated that the reading section of textbooks and CSAT included a considerable portion of passages whose text difficulty levels were higher than CEFR B2, exceeding the achievement standards required for high school graduates. These results suggest that difficulty levels in the national curriculum, textbooks, and CSAT should be adjusted according to target levels of language proficiency based on CEFR levels so that learning burden of students can be lessened and competency-based English teaching and learning finally can be performed.
Abstract
This research investigated consistency of achievement levels stated in the 2015 revised national curriculum of English, high school English textbooks, and the Korean College Scholastic Ability Test (CSAT) according to CEFR Levels. Based on CEFR levels, this study compared levels of targeted achievement standards in the national curriculum, focusing on reading passages in High School EnglishⅡ and CSAT implemented for three consecutive years (2021-2023). Results indicated that the reading section of textbooks and CSAT included a considerable portion of passages whose text difficulty levels were higher than CEFR B2, exceeding the achievement standards required for high school graduates. These results suggest that difficulty levels in the national curriculum, textbooks, and CSAT should be adjusted according to target levels of language proficiency based on CEFR levels so that learning burden of students can be lessened and competency-based English teaching and learning finally can be performed.
참고문헌 (25)
- "English vocabulary profile" (2015)[URL]
- Chen, Q., "A corpus-based lexical study on frequency and distribution of Coxhead’s AWL word families in medical research articles(RAs)", English for Specific Purposes, 26(4), pp.502~514 (2007)
- 최정은, "2015 개정 영어과 교육과정의 성취 수준과 대학수학능력 영어 평가 수준의 일관성 문제", 영어평가, 17(1), pp.11~43 (2022), 한국영어평가학회[DOI]
- Council of Europe, "Common European framework of reference for languages : Learning, teaching, assessment" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Council of Europe, "Common European framework of reference for languages:Learning, teaching, assessment (companion volume with new descriptors)" (2018), Cambridge University Press
- Coxhead, A., "A new academic word list", TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), pp.213~238 (2000)
- 황필아, "2015 개정 초등영어 교육과정의 읽기 성취기준 적정성 연구", 영어교과교육, 15(4), pp.147~165 (2016), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
- Hyland, K., "Displinary interactions : Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), pp.133~151 (2004)
- Jeon, J. H., "Restructuring the elementary English curriculum based on CEFR criteria:Focusing on language materials, communicative functions, and achievement standards", master, pp.2022
- Jeong, W. M., "Comparison between IB curriculum and Korean innovative school curriculum", doctor, pp.2020
- Analysis of the appropriateness of elementary and middle school subject contents in 2015 revised national curriculum, "Joo, H. M.", Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.Report No. RRC 2020-6-1 (2020)
- Development of a future-oriented national English curriculum in the post-COVID era, "Joo, H. M.", Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.Report No. CRC 2021-13 (2021)
- 강영란, "영어 모어 화자의 한국어 논설문에 나타난 메타담화표지 사용 양상", 새국어교육, (127), pp.517~549 (2021), 한국국어교육학회[DOI]
- 김희섭, "글로벌화와 한국의 외국어교육 - CEFR의 도입과 의의를 중심으로 -", 인문사회과학연구, 20(4), pp.79~96 (2019), 인문사회과학연구소[DOI]
- 김재은, "고등학교 영어 교과서, EBS 수능 연계 교재, 대학수학능력시험의 코퍼스기반 난이도 비교 분석", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 18(1), pp.59~92 (2015), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
- 이병천, "영어교과 평가의 성취기준 비교 분석", 중등영어교육, 11(4), pp.127~146 (2018), 한국중등영어교육학회[DOI]
- 이소영, "2015 개정 영어과 교육과정의 변화 및 쟁점: 공통 교육과정을 중심으로", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 16(7), pp.499~519 (2016), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- 이영식, "영어과 개정 교육과정의 성취기준과 CEFR과의 비교 연구", 현대영어교육, 10(2), pp.108~132 (2009), 현대영어교육학회
- Ministry of Education, "2015 revised national English curriculum" (2015), Ministry of Education
- North, B., "The CEFR in practice" (2014), Cambridge University Press
- 박현숙, "2009", 2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 고등학교 영어 교과서 읽기 지문의 연계성 분석, 2020, pp.34(4), 179~202[DOI]
- 박정곤, "Coh-Metrix를 활용한 고등학교 영어 교과서와 대학수학능력시험 읽기 지문 난이도 비교 연구", 영어영문학연구, 47(3), pp.147~170 (2021), 대한영어영문학회[DOI]
- 신동광, "기본 어휘의 선정 기준 －영어 어휘를 중심으로", 국어교육학연구, (40), pp.217~243 (2011), 국어교육학회[DOI]
- 손소혜, "2015 개정 교육과정 고등학교 영어 교과서 어휘사용 양상에 대한 코퍼스 기반 연구", 교원교육, 38(1), pp.289~313 (2022), 교육연구원
- 송주하, "2015 고등 영어과 개정교과서 통사적 복잡성 및 이독성 비교 분석", 현대영어교육, 22(1), pp.57~69 (2021), 현대영어교육학회[DOI]