‘말-’의 다의 현상에 대한 인지언어학적 탐색: ‘않-’과의 의미 비교를 중심으로
A cognitive linguistic exploration of the polysemization of Mal-: Based on comparison of Anh-
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the polysemization of mal- in the image-schematic theory of cognitive linguistics. There are two aspects of symmetric/asymmetric image schemas in the prototypical meaning of mal-. Here, the symmetric image schema shares certain meanings with anh-. It is when mal- is combined with nouns or occurs in repetitive ending constructions that such a symmetric image schema is reflected. To the contrary, the auxiliary verb -ci mal- reflects the asymmetric image schema between [+action area] and [-action area]. Here, -ci mal- has the meaning of ‘ban’ as it [+excludes] the [+action area] of the main verb. Also, the auxiliary verb -ko mal- forms a boundary of [+action area], and hence the agent goes through and enter that. Due to such aspects, modal meanings like strong will, regret etc. are derived. Hacamaca also reflects the asymmetric image schema. It reflects the image schema of going through the boundary, entering the [+action area], and then quickly escaping from that to shift to the [-action area] of a new phase. Thus, it has the meaning of ‘quick conversion of action.’
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the polysemization of mal- in the image-schematic theory of cognitive linguistics. There are two aspects of symmetric/asymmetric image schemas in the prototypical meaning of mal-. Here, the symmetric image schema shares certain meanings with anh-. It is when mal- is combined with nouns or occurs in repetitive ending constructions that such a symmetric image schema is reflected. To the contrary, the auxiliary verb -ci mal- reflects the asymmetric image schema between [+action area] and [-action area]. Here, -ci mal- has the meaning of ‘ban’ as it [+excludes] the [+action area] of the main verb. Also, the auxiliary verb -ko mal- forms a boundary of [+action area], and hence the agent goes through and enter that. Due to such aspects, modal meanings like strong will, regret etc. are derived. Hacamaca also reflects the asymmetric image schema. It reflects the image schema of going through the boundary, entering the [+action area], and then quickly escaping from that to shift to the [-action area] of a new phase. Thus, it has the meaning of ‘quick conversion of action.’
참고문헌 (23)
- 김선영, "부정 구성 ‘-지 말-’의 통합 양상과 의미", 國語學, (46), pp.331~354 (2005), 국어학회[DOI]
- 김명희, "문법화의 틀에서 보는 보조동사 구문", 담화와인지, 2, pp.129~146 (1996)
- 김성화, "-{지, 다가, 고} 말-의 의미 기능", 국어국문학, 53, pp.143~174 (1989)
- 김영태, "보조용언과 서술 전개 단계", 우리말글, 15, pp.37~59 (1997)
- 김영희, "‘닥-아서’에서 ‘다가’까지", 연세어문학, 6, pp.83~108 (1975)
- 김용석, "한국어 보조동사 연구", 배달말, 8(1), pp.1~33 (1983)
- 김진수, "국어 접속조사와 어미연구" (1987), 탑출판사
- 서정수, "국어문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 이관규, "보조동사의 논항 구조", 국어교육, 96, pp.273~296 (1998)
- 이상복, "동사 ‘말다’에 대하여", 연세어문학, 12, pp.13~39 (1979)
- 이상태, "국어 접속어미 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1988
- 이정민, "부정 명령의 분석", 어학연구, 13(2), pp.105~114 (1977)
- 이정택, "접속어미 ‘-자, -자마자, -았자’의 의미와 문법", 애산학보, 17, pp.71~97 (1995)
- 장호종, "말다'의 의미와 용법적", 한국어학, 20, pp.221~239 (2003), 한국어학회
- 최상진, "부연의 연결어미 ‘-지’의 의미와 용법", 한국어학, 42, pp.291~316 (2009), 한국어학회
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1971), 정음문화사
- 허웅, "우리 옛말본" (1975), 샘문화사
- 홍윤기, "連結語尾의 相的 意味 表示 機能 －‘-느라고, -(으)면서, -자마자, -다 보니, -고 보니’를 중심으로－", 어문연구(語文硏究), 33(1), pp.109~129 (2005), 한국어문교육연구회
- Lakoff, George, "인지 의미론", pp.235~ (1994), 한국문화사
- Haiman, John, "Perspectives on grammaticalization", pp.3~28 (1994), John Benjamins
- Johnson, Mark, "The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason" (1987), University of Chicago Press
- Rhee, Seongha, "When stop goes further: From malta ‘stop’ to auxiliary verbs in Korean", Korean Language Research, 13, pp.309~339 (2003)
- Shin, Keun Young, "Auxiliary selection and the role of transitivity in grammaticalization: The Korean auxiliary verbs pelita and malta", Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 11, pp.96~121 (2010)