이동의 가상적 확장에 대한 연구
study on the fictive extension of motion
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates the meaning extension of motion. Motion constitutes fundamental aspects in human experiences, which extend to abstract or fictive motion due to semantic components of ‘motion event’. Semantic components consist of figure, ground, motion, path, manner, and cause in ‘motion event’. The fictive extension of motion can be explained through ‘mapping’ in conceptual metaphor theory, which explains that ‘target domain’ is mapped by ‘source domain’. The present study shows that fictive extension is manifested through a metaphorical conceptualization in which A NON-MOVING THING IS A MOVING THING. A non-moving thing is perceived as a moving thing from the conceptualizer’s perception. Next, fictive extension is classified as relative and psychological extension depending on the existence of ‘reference point’. To be more specific, relative extension is perceived as motion by ‘reference point’ of a moving entity. Relative extension can be classified as two types: One is that conceptualizer is mapped by the salient property where conceptualizer is the ‘reference point’. The other is that the path is mapped by the salient property where the moving entity is the ‘reference point’. Furthermore, psychological extension is perceived as motion without ‘reference point’. Psychological extension is that motion is mapped by the salient property when observed through the naked eye. This study concludes that the motion has various aspects of extension through semantic components.
Abstract
This study investigates the meaning extension of motion. Motion constitutes fundamental aspects in human experiences, which extend to abstract or fictive motion due to semantic components of ‘motion event’. Semantic components consist of figure, ground, motion, path, manner, and cause in ‘motion event’. The fictive extension of motion can be explained through ‘mapping’ in conceptual metaphor theory, which explains that ‘target domain’ is mapped by ‘source domain’. The present study shows that fictive extension is manifested through a metaphorical conceptualization in which A NON-MOVING THING IS A MOVING THING. A non-moving thing is perceived as a moving thing from the conceptualizer’s perception. Next, fictive extension is classified as relative and psychological extension depending on the existence of ‘reference point’. To be more specific, relative extension is perceived as motion by ‘reference point’ of a moving entity. Relative extension can be classified as two types: One is that conceptualizer is mapped by the salient property where conceptualizer is the ‘reference point’. The other is that the path is mapped by the salient property where the moving entity is the ‘reference point’. Furthermore, psychological extension is perceived as motion without ‘reference point’. Psychological extension is that motion is mapped by the salient property when observed through the naked eye. This study concludes that the motion has various aspects of extension through semantic components.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김응모, "국어평행이동 자동사 낱말밭" (1989), 한신문화사
- 노양진, "몸의 철학적 담론", 용봉논총, 30(1), pp.259~276 (2001)
- 박정운, "앞으로 한달 뒤에 만납시다 : 시간의 개념적 은유", 언어와 언어학, 23, pp.85~110 (1998)
- 이종열, "‘가다’의 다의성에 대한 인지의미론적 연구", 한국어 의미학, 3, pp.97~118 (1998)
- 임지룡, "국어의미론" (1992), 탑출판사
- 임지룡, "주관적 이동표현의 인지적 의미 특성", 담화와 인지, 5(2), pp.181~205 (1998)
- 임지룡, "의미의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2008), 한국문화사
- 임태성, "한국어의 '시간' 속성과 모형 연구", 석사, 국어학, pp.2010
- 임태성, "국어 가상 이동의 양상과 의미 특성 연구", 박사, pp.2016
- 전수태, "국어 이동동사 의미 연구" (2009), 박이정
- 채희락, "이동동사의 분류와 정의", 현대문법연구, 15, pp.79~100 (1999)
- 천기석, "국어 운동동사의 분석", 어문학, 49, pp.237~286 (1987)
- Evans, Vyvyan, "The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition" (2004), John Benjamins
- Evans, Vyvyan, "인지언어학 기초" (2006), 한국문화사
- Geeraerts, Dirk, "인지언어학 옥스퍼드 핸드북" (2011), 로고스라임
- Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., "Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics", pp.291~307 (1996), Ablex
- Goldberg, Adele E., "구문문법" (2004), 한국문화사
- Heine, Bernd, "World lexicon of grammaticalization" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Kövecses, Zoltán, "Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor" (2015), Oxford University Press
- Kövecses, Zoltán, "Metonymy : Developing a cognitive linguistic view", Cognitive Linguistics, pp.37~77 (1998)
- Lakoff, George, "Metaphor and thought", pp.202~251 (1993), Cambridge University Press
- Lakoff, George, "삶으로서의 은유" (1995), 서광사
- Lakoff, George, "몸의 철학: 신체화된 마음의 서구 사상에 대한 도전" (2002), 박이정
- Langacker, Ronald W., "인지문법의 토대: 이론적 선행조건들" (1987), 박이정
- Langacker, Ronald W., "Reference-point constructions", Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), pp.1~38 (1993)
- Langacker, Ronald W., "인지문법" (2014), 박이정
- Matsumoto, Yo, "Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs", Cognitive Linguistics, 7(2), pp.183~226 (1996)
- Miller, George A., "Language and perception" (1976), The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
- Radden, Günter, "Cognitive linguistics in the Redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics", pp.423~458 (1996), Mouton de Gruyter
- Talmy, Leonard, "Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon", pp.57~149 (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Talmy, Leonard, "Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 1: Concept structuring system" (2000), MIT Press
- Tyler, Andrea, "인지언어학과 제2언어 학습" (2015), 로고스라임