Disyllabic Constraint on Sino-Korean Compounds: A Distributed Morphology Account
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper investigates the disyllabic requirement imposed oncompounds in Sino-Korean within the framework of Distributed Morphology. Ipropose that Sino-Korean compound formation involves ‘root merger’ (Zhang2007) and conflation (Harley 2004). Building upon this basic compoundingprocess, I further propose in the spirit of Hale (2001) that syllabic length ofSino-Korean compounds is controlled by the functional head n°, associatedwith a prosodic template which can accommodate two syllabic slots. With thisprosodic template that limits the size of nP in Sino-Korean to two syllables, anaccount for the ungrammaticality of trisyllabic ca-compounds and thederivation of other (ca-)compounds of different syllabic lengthstraightforwardly follows. A consequence of the present account is that Koreanpossesses two distinct nominal functional heads: Sino-Korean n° andNative-Korean n°, the former of which cannot host more than two syllables,while the latter of which can.
Abstract
This paper investigates the disyllabic requirement imposed oncompounds in Sino-Korean within the framework of Distributed Morphology. Ipropose that Sino-Korean compound formation involves ‘root merger’ (Zhang2007) and conflation (Harley 2004). Building upon this basic compoundingprocess, I further propose in the spirit of Hale (2001) that syllabic length ofSino-Korean compounds is controlled by the functional head n°, associatedwith a prosodic template which can accommodate two syllabic slots. With thisprosodic template that limits the size of nP in Sino-Korean to two syllables, anaccount for the ungrammaticality of trisyllabic ca-compounds and thederivation of other (ca-)compounds of different syllabic lengthstraightforwardly follows. A consequence of the present account is that Koreanpossesses two distinct nominal functional heads: Sino-Korean n° andNative-Korean n°, the former of which cannot host more than two syllables,while the latter of which can.
참고문헌 (29)
- Baker, M, "Incorporation" (1988), Oxford University Press
- Bobaljik, J. D, "The 1999 Maryland Mayfest on Morphology (University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 10)", pp.35~71 (2000), Department of Linguistics, University of Maryland
- Ceccagno, A, "Compound headedness in Chinese: An analysis of neologisms", Morphology, 17, pp.207~231 (2007)
- Chae, S, "The core-periphery structure in the Korean lexicon reflected in a phonological variation and change", Studies in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology, 5, pp.217~236 (1999)
- Choi, J, "MIT Working Papers in Linguistics(Proceedings of WAFL 7)", pp.33~46 (2011), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Duanmu, S, "Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics", pp.351~355 (2006), Elsevier Publishing House
- Embick, D, "Blocking effects and analytic", synthetic alternations, 2007, pp.25, 1~37
- Feng, S, "New Approaches to Chinese Word Formation", pp.197~260 (1994), Mouton de Gruyter
- Feng, S, "Prosodically Determined Word-Formation in Mandarin Chinese", Social Science in China, 4, pp.120~137 (1997)
- Hale, K, "Navajo verb stem position and the bipartite structure of the Navajo conjunct sector", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.678~693 (2001)
- Hale, K, "Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure" (2002), MIT Press
- Halle, M, "The view from Building 20", pp.111~176 (1993), MIT Press
- Harley, H, "Proceedings of NELS 34", pp.239~254 (2004), GSLA
- Harley, H, "The Oxford Handbook of Compounding", pp.129~144 (2009), Oxford University Press
- Harley, H, "State-of-the-art article: Distributed morphology", GLOT International, 4(4), pp.3~9 (1999)
- Harley, H, "The lexicon–encyclopedia interface", pp.349~374 (2000), Elsevier
- The core-periphery structure of the lexicon and constraints on reranking, "Itô, J", GLSA, 181~209, pp.University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18 (1995)
- Johannessen, J. B, "Coordination" (1998), Oxford University Press
- Kiparsky, P, "A Festshrift for Morris Halle", pp.93~106 (1973), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Lekakou, M, "Polydefinites in Greek: Ellipsis, close apposition and expletive determiners", Journal of Linguistics, 48, pp.107~149 (2012)
- Marantz, A, "No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon", UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2), pp.201~225 (1997)
- Packard, J, "A lexical morphology approach to word formation in Mandarin", Yearbook of Morphology, 3, pp.21~37 (1990)
- 박선우, "한국어의 어휘계층과 음운론적 복잡성", 음성음운형태론연구, 19(2), pp.255~274 (2013), 한국음운론학회
- Sohn, H-M, "The Korean language" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Song, K. J, "Remarks on Modern Sino-Korean", Language Research, 22, pp.469~501 (1986)
- Ussishkin, A, "Affix-favored contrast inequity and psycholinguistic grounding for non-concatenative morphology", Morphology, 16, pp.107~125 (2006)
- Zhang, N, "Root merger in Chinese compounds", Studia Linguistica, 61, pp.170~184 (2007)
- "Standard Korean Dictionary on-line version"[URL]