본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Verb Sensitivity of the English Dative Alternation: Experimental Evidence from Give-type Verbs

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The verb-sensitive approach to the English dative alternation proposed by Rappaport Hovav and Levin (2008) assumes that subtypes of alternating verbs differ in their association with two meanings—caused possession and caused motion. The purpose of this paper is to assess the empirical validity of this approach in comparison with that of the uniform multiple meaning approach, which takes all alternating verbs to have caused-possession and caused-motion meanings and to encode caused motion in the to-variant. We report two rating experiments designed to test speakers’ judgments of dative sentences which describe events of caused possession but do not involve caused motion. The results of the experiments show that to-dative sentences describing such events are judged invariably acceptable by speakers when factors of givenness and heaviness are controlled for. This evidence argues against the uniform multiple meaning approach and supports the proposal of the verb-sensitive approach that give-type verbs have only a caused-possession meaning independently of the variants in which they appear.

Abstract

The verb-sensitive approach to the English dative alternation proposed by Rappaport Hovav and Levin (2008) assumes that subtypes of alternating verbs differ in their association with two meanings—caused possession and caused motion. The purpose of this paper is to assess the empirical validity of this approach in comparison with that of the uniform multiple meaning approach, which takes all alternating verbs to have caused-possession and caused-motion meanings and to encode caused motion in the to-variant. We report two rating experiments designed to test speakers’ judgments of dative sentences which describe events of caused possession but do not involve caused motion. The results of the experiments show that to-dative sentences describing such events are judged invariably acceptable by speakers when factors of givenness and heaviness are controlled for. This evidence argues against the uniform multiple meaning approach and supports the proposal of the verb-sensitive approach that give-type verbs have only a caused-possession meaning independently of the variants in which they appear.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Arto Anttila, "The role of prosody in the English dative alternation", Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7-9), pp.946~981 (2010), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  2. Jennifer E. Arnold, "Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering", Language, 76(1), pp.28~55 (2000), Project Muse[DOI]
  3. Baker, Mark, "Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax", pp.73~137 (1997), Kluwer
  4. Beavers, John, "An aspectual analysis of the ditransitive verbs of caused possession in English", Journal of Semantics, 28(1), pp.1~54 (2011)[DOI]
  5. Sigrid Beck, "Double Objects Again", Linguistic Inquiry, 35(1), pp.97~123 (2004), MIT Press - Journals[DOI]
  6. Bod, Rens, "Probabilistic linguistics" (2003), MIT Press
  7. Paul Boersma, "Empirical Tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm", Linguistic Inquiry, 32(1), pp.45~86 (2001), MIT Press - Journals[DOI]
  8. Bresnan, Joan, "Cognitive foundations of interpretation", pp.69~94 (2007), Royal Netherlands Academy of Science
  9. Boersma, Paul, "Reality exploration and diversity: Pattern interaction in language and life", pp.161~184 (2009), CSLI Publications
  10. Joan Bresnan, "Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English", Language, 86(1), pp.168~213 (2010), Project Muse[DOI]
  11. PETER COLLINS, "The indirect object construction in English: an informational approach", Linguistics, 33(1), pp.35~49 (1995), Walter de Gruyter GmbH[DOI]
  12. Davidse, Kristin, "The dative, Vol. I: Descriptive studies", pp.289~338 (1996), John Benjamins
  13. Goldberg, Adele, "Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
  14. Goldberg, Adele, "Constructions at work: The nature of generalizations in language" (2006), Oxford University Press
  15. Goldsmith, John, "Harvard studies in syntax and semantics", pp.423~449 (1980), Harvard University
  16. Green, Georgia, "Semantics and syntactic regularity" (1974), Indiana University Press
  17. Gruber, Jeffrey, "Studies in lexical relations", Ph.D, pp.1965
  18. Hale, Ken, "Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure" (2002), MIT Press
  19. Harley, Heidi, "Linguistic variation yearbook 2", pp.31~70 (2002), John Benjamins
  20. Heidi Harley, "support of PHAVE analysis of the double object construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 46(4), pp.703~730 (2015), MIT Press - Journals[DOI]
  21. Hawkins, John, "Efficiency and complexity in grammar" (2004), Oxford University Press
  22. Jackendoff, Ray, "Semantic interpretation in generative grammar" (1972), MIT Press
  23. Jackendoff, Ray, "Semantics and cognition" (1983), MIT Press
  24. Jang, Seo Yeon, "The association of dative verbs with event structural meanings: An experimental study", M.A, pp.2018
  25. Krifka, Manfred, "Semantic and Pragmatic conditions for the Dative Alternation", 영어학, 4(1), pp.1~31 (2004), 한국영어학회
  26. Madlener, Karin, "Frequency effects in instructed second language acquisition" (2015), Mouton de Gruyter
  27. KIM McDONOUGH, "Comparing the effect of skewed and balanced input on English as a foreign language learners’ comprehension of the double-object dative construction", Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(2), pp.419~442 (2014), Cambridge University Press (CUP)[DOI]
  28. Richard T. Oehrle, "Semantics and Syntactic Regularity", Language, 53(1), pp.198~208 (1977), JSTOR[DOI]
  29. Pinker, Steven, "Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure" (1989), MIT Press
  30. MALKA RAPPAPORT HOVAV, "The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity", Journal of Linguistics, 44(1), pp.129~167 (2008), Cambridge University Press (CUP)[DOI]
  31. Ruppenhofer, Josef, "The interaction of valence and information structure", Ph.D, pp.2004
  32. Snyder, Kieran, "The relationship between form and function in ditransitive constructions", Ph.D, pp.2003
  33. Anatol Stefanowitsch, "Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), pp.209~243 (2003), John Benjamins Publishing Company[DOI]
  34. Thompson, Sandra, "Development and diversity: Language variation across time and space", pp.239~253 (1990), Summer Institute of Linguistics
  35. Wasow, Thomas, "Postverbal behavior" (2002), CSLI Publications
  36. JUNGEUN YEAR, "Korean Speakers' Acquisition of the English Ditransitive Construction: The Role of Verb Prototype, Input Distribution, and Frequency", The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), pp.399~417 (2009), Wiley[DOI]
  37. 윤소연, "Correlation between semantic compatibility and frequency: A usage-based approach", 언어연구, 30(2), pp.243~272 (2013), 언어정보연구소[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)