‘에서’ 주어의 동인에 대한 인지적 접근
Cognitive approach to eyse subject’s driver
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper explains the cause of the Korean eyse subject, which is construed as an actor, not a location. The marker eyse is an adverbial particle. However, the nominals that it encompasses show the same function as the subject in specific situations. This is also confirmed through a subjecthood test. This paper suggests three causes for this phenomenon as follows. First, eyse subject construction is based on the meaning of eyse. The marker eyse has various meanings. Among them, the meaning indicating the position of the actor is related to eyse subject construction. In eyse subject construction, the marker eyse maintains its original meaning. Second, the eyse subject is possible if the place and the actor are in a reference point relationship. This occurs when the two elements are always related to the place as a reference point and the actor as a goal. Third, the actor must be in an unspecified situation. Since the actor is unspecified, cognitively remarkable places replace the actor. In other words, the reference point relationship is realized as a metanomy. This process can be confirmed in a symbolic structure. When all three of these are satisfied, the eyse nominal is construed as the subject.
Abstract
This paper explains the cause of the Korean eyse subject, which is construed as an actor, not a location. The marker eyse is an adverbial particle. However, the nominals that it encompasses show the same function as the subject in specific situations. This is also confirmed through a subjecthood test. This paper suggests three causes for this phenomenon as follows. First, eyse subject construction is based on the meaning of eyse. The marker eyse has various meanings. Among them, the meaning indicating the position of the actor is related to eyse subject construction. In eyse subject construction, the marker eyse maintains its original meaning. Second, the eyse subject is possible if the place and the actor are in a reference point relationship. This occurs when the two elements are always related to the place as a reference point and the actor as a goal. Third, the actor must be in an unspecified situation. Since the actor is unspecified, cognitively remarkable places replace the actor. In other words, the reference point relationship is realized as a metanomy. This process can be confirmed in a symbolic structure. When all three of these are satisfied, the eyse nominal is construed as the subject.
참고문헌 (31)
- 김민국, "한국어 주어의 격표지 연구", 박사, pp.2016
- 김민국, "‘에서’ 주어의 통사와 의미", 國語學, (81), pp.145~190 (2017), 국어학회[DOI]
- 김민수, "국어문법론" (1971), 일조각
- 김양진, "국어의 격과 조사", pp.941~986 (1999), 도서출판 월인
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (1993), 탑출판사
- 박양규, "국어의 처격에 대한 연구", 국어연구, 27 (1972)
- 박양규, "존칭 체언의 통사론적 특성", 진단학보, 40, pp.81~108 (1975)
- 서정목, "후치사 ‘-서’의 의미에 대하여", 언어학, 9(1), pp.155~186 (1984)
- 成光秀, "國語助詞에 대한 硏究 : 生成理論的 分析을 中心으로", 박사, pp.1978
- 이광호, "처격어미 {에}, {에서}의 의미와 그 통합 양상", 어문학논총, 3, pp.87~105 (1984)
- 이기동, "조사 ‘에’와 ‘에서’의 기본 의미", 한글, 173․174, pp.9~33 (1981)
- 이남순, "양식의 ‘에’와 소재의 ‘에서’", 관악어문연구, 8, pp.321~335 (1983)
- 이정택, "이른바 주격조사 ‘－에서’에 관하여", 한말연구, (27), pp.195~212 (2010), 한말연구학회[DOI]
- 이정택, "주어를 제한하는 ‘NP+에서’ 구성", 한말연구, (29), pp.281~296 (2011), 한말연구학회[DOI]
- 이윤미, "한국어의 비주격 주어에 대한 연구", 석사, 국어국문학과, pp.2014
- 이익섭, "국어문법론" (1983), 학연사
- 이익섭, "국어문법론강의" (1999), 학연사
- 임홍빈, "국어문법론1" (1995), 한국방송대학교 출판부
- 주시경, "국어문법" (1977), 탑출판사
- 최재희, "한국어 문법론" (2004), 태학사
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1937), 정음사
- 황화상, "조사 ‘에서’의 문법 범주", 배달말, (39), pp.371~394 (2006), 배달말학회
- 황화상, "조사 ‘에’와 ‘에서’의 의미 기능: 소재(所在)와 처소(處所)를 중심으로", 한국어학, 52, pp.295~321 (2011), 한국어학회
- 최영주, "Korean Dative-Nominative-Predicate Constructionsas a Reference Point Phenomenon", 담화와 인지, 25(4), pp.117~140 (2018), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- Kroeger, Paul R., "Analyzing syntax" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Lakoff, George, "Metaphors we live by" (1980), University of Chicago Press
- Langacker, Ronald W, "Reference-point construction", Cognitive Linguistics, 4, pp.1~38 (1993)
- Langacker, Ronald W., "Cognitive grammar" (2008), Stanford University Press
- Song, Jae Jung, "The organization and document construction in Korean: A relational analysis", Linguistics, 33, pp.763~808 (1995)
- Song, Jae Jung, "Case, animacy and semantic roles", pp.183~206 (2011), John Benjamins
- Yamamoto, Mutsumi, "Animacy and reference" (1999), John Benjamins