방위에 따른 정측창 시스템의 채광성능 평가
Daylighting Performance of Topside Lighting Systems for Different Orientations
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Daylighting is core of sustainable design in most buildings. Well-designed daylighting systems can significantly reduce or even eliminate the electric lighting loads during the day time, including air conditioning energy loads. Among window systems, the topside lights systems including monitor lighting, sawtooth lighting, sunscoop and, lightscoop is one of the most popular apparatus to improve the lighting quantity. Also they are important both in terms of energy savings and visual quality. The objective of this study is to analyse daylighting performance of topside lighting system for different orientations. Four types of topside lighting system were tested and compared: monitor lighting, sawtooth lighting, lightscoop and sunscoop. Totally 25 measuring points of illuminance on the horizontal plane were monitored from 09:00 to 17:00 on October 6, 2008. Agilent data logger and photometric sensors Li-cor were used. Comparisons with a light factor is discussed. The results found in this study would mean that there were no significant differences in light factor between three cases.
Abstract
Daylighting is core of sustainable design in most buildings. Well-designed daylighting systems can significantly reduce or even eliminate the electric lighting loads during the day time, including air conditioning energy loads. Among window systems, the topside lights systems including monitor lighting, sawtooth lighting, sunscoop and, lightscoop is one of the most popular apparatus to improve the lighting quantity. Also they are important both in terms of energy savings and visual quality. The objective of this study is to analyse daylighting performance of topside lighting system for different orientations. Four types of topside lighting system were tested and compared: monitor lighting, sawtooth lighting, lightscoop and sunscoop. Totally 25 measuring points of illuminance on the horizontal plane were monitored from 09:00 to 17:00 on October 6, 2008. Agilent data logger and photometric sensors Li-cor were used. Comparisons with a light factor is discussed. The results found in this study would mean that there were no significant differences in light factor between three cases.
참고문헌 (11)
- V. Garcia-Hansen, "Passive solar systems for heating, daylighting and ventilation for rooms without an equator facing facade", Renewable Energy, 26, pp.91~111 (2002)
- 공효주, "특수형 정측창 시스템의 자연채광성능에 관한 축소모형 실험 - 선 스쿠프, 라이트 스쿠프 및 선 캐처 시스템을 중심으로 -", 한국생태환경건축학회 논문집, 8(1), pp.45~52 (2008), 한국생태환경건축학회
- 공효주, "천공상태에 따른 수직형 광파이프 시스템의 채광성능 평가", 한국생태환경건축학회 논문집, 8(3), pp.101~106 (2008), 한국생태환경건축학회
- 김창성, "직사일광을 고려한 전천공 조건에서 상부채광 형태에 따른 박물관 전시공간의 자연채광 성능 평가", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 22(4), pp.309~316 (2006), 대한건축학회
- 정인영, "축소모형을 이용한 가변 유리투과체의 채광 유형별 성능평가 비교", 한국생태환경건축학회 논문집, 4(3), pp.27~35 (2004)
- 지철근, "조명환경원론", pp.191~193 (2005), 문운당
- 최원기, "Suncatcher System에 의한 북측면의 주광 및 열환경 성능 평가", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 21(6), pp.133~140 (2005), 대한건축학회
- Egan M. David, "Architectural Lighting", pp.124~136 (2001), Mc Graw Hill Higher Education
- Rea, Mark Stanley, "The IESNA Lighting Handbook : Reference & Application", 2-5~2-19 (2000)