본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

비명시적 평가지표를 활용한 농촌정책 평가

A Quantitative Evaluation of Composite Indicators: Empirical Analysis of Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

The purpose of this study is to construct a quantitative evaluation method that can analyze the policy effectiveness with the construction of a implicit composite index incorporating spatial econometrics models. In order to propose a methodological framework for the program evaluation, this study conducts an empirical analysis with the application of the Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project (CRVDP) which explicitly claims to achieve comprehensive goal of community development. The present study pays particular attention to quantifying the composite evaluation index and drawing net effect through the application of a series of spatial econometrics models. The spatial unit of the analysis is drawn at Eup-Myeon level in rural areas in Korea, and the time horizon is in between 2005 and 2010. We utilize the Korean Agricultural Census data in 2005 and 2010. Three steps of methodological processes are needed to satisfy the objective of the present study. First, we apply factor analysis to construct the composite index that represents comprehensive settlement environment in rural area. The index should be matched with the main objective of the CRVDP. Second, we apply the derived index to a series of spatial econometrics model as dependent variable. Lastly, utilizing the estimated coefficients of the econometrics models, we apply decomposition technique to estimate CRVDP’s net effect from both cross-sectional and longitudinal perspectives. We find that the results of the decomposition analysis by the execution of the CRVDP are positively associated with the explicit object of the project.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to construct a quantitative evaluation method that can analyze the policy effectiveness with the construction of a implicit composite index incorporating spatial econometrics models. In order to propose a methodological framework for the program evaluation, this study conducts an empirical analysis with the application of the Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project (CRVDP) which explicitly claims to achieve comprehensive goal of community development. The present study pays particular attention to quantifying the composite evaluation index and drawing net effect through the application of a series of spatial econometrics models. The spatial unit of the analysis is drawn at Eup-Myeon level in rural areas in Korea, and the time horizon is in between 2005 and 2010. We utilize the Korean Agricultural Census data in 2005 and 2010. Three steps of methodological processes are needed to satisfy the objective of the present study. First, we apply factor analysis to construct the composite index that represents comprehensive settlement environment in rural area. The index should be matched with the main objective of the CRVDP. Second, we apply the derived index to a series of spatial econometrics model as dependent variable. Lastly, utilizing the estimated coefficients of the econometrics models, we apply decomposition technique to estimate CRVDP’s net effect from both cross-sectional and longitudinal perspectives. We find that the results of the decomposition analysis by the execution of the CRVDP are positively associated with the explicit object of the project.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Blinder, A. S., "Wage Discrimination : Reduced Form and Structural Estimates, Journal of Human Resources", Journal of Human Resources, 8(4), pp.436~455 (1973)
  2. Brandth, B., "Farm Diversification Into Tourism–Implications For Social Identity?", Journal of Rural Studies, 27(1), pp.35~44 (2011)
  3. Galstyan, M., "Quantification of Qualitative Data : The Case of the Central Bank of Armenia", IPM17 : Implementing the 1993 System of National Accounts, 202~ (2010)
  4. Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Impact Evaluation and Measuring Results, "Garbarino, S.", Governance and Social Development, ~ (2009)
  5. 신상영, "토지이용 특성과 침수피해면적 간의 관계 분석: 서울시를 사례로", 국토연구, 81, pp.3~20 (2014), 국토연구원
  6. Hwang, J. H., "The Effect of the Rural Tourism Policy on Non-Farm Income in South Korea", Tourism Management, 46, pp.501~513 (2015)
  7. 제갈돈, "평가연구에서 분석수준의 통합에 관한 논의:미시・거시 수준의 연계", 정책분석평가학회보, 19(4), pp.16~41 (2009), 한국정책분석평가학회
  8. 주우일, "농촌지역 주거환경 질 지표측정을 통한 정책방향설정에 관한 연구 - 거창군을 대상으로 -", 주거환경, 6(2), pp.77~95 (2008), 한국주거환경학회
  9. 김봉태, "어가부채 결정요인 및 부채경감대책의 효과 분석", 지역연구, 27(4), pp.111~130 (2011), 한국지역학회
  10. Kim, K. K., "Natural Amenities and Rural Development:Understanding Spatial and Distributional Attributes", Growth and Change, 36(2), pp.273~297 (2005)
  11. 이해진, "농촌정책 패러다임의 변화와 농촌지역개발사업-‘농촌마을종합개발사업’을 사례로-", 농촌사회, 19(1), pp.7~47 (2009), 한국농촌사회학회
  12. Lee, J. J., "Politics and Government: An Economic Perspective" (2005), Parkyoungsa
  13. 이성우, "농업․농촌정책평가를 위한 정량적 분석모형 연구", 농촌계획, 14(4), pp.97~108 (2008), 한국농촌계획학회
  14. Lee, S. W., "The Effects of Rural Settlement Projects on the Living Environment in Korea", Harvard Asia Quarterly, 13(3), pp.6~13 (2011)
  15. Leeuw, F. L., "Impact Evaluations and Development: NONIE Guidance on Impact Evaluation" (2009), Network of Impact Evaluation
  16. The Use of Indicators for the Monitoring and Evaluation of Knowledge Management and Knowledge Brokering in International Development Report of a workshop, "Mansfield, W.", Loughborough University and IDS Knowledge Services, ~ (2013)
  17. McDavid, J. C., "Program Evaluation and Performance Measurement: An Introduction to Practice" (2012), Sage Publications
  18. Neuman, L. W., "Social Research Methods:Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches" (2002), Pearson
  19. Oaxaca, R., "Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets", International Economic Review, 14(3), pp.693~709 (1973)
  20. Ohe, Y., "On the Relationship between Multi-Functionality and Hamlet Activities as a Rural Institution", Japanese Journal of Rural Economics, 8, pp.41~57 (2006)
  21. Ohe, Y., "Multi-functionality and Rural Tourism:A Perspective on Farm Diversification", Journal of International Farm Management, 4(1), pp.18~40 (2007)
  22. Park, J. D., "WTO and Agricultural Policy Reform" (2005), Hanul Academy
  23. Evaluating and Restructuring the Agricultural and Rural Aggregate Policies in Korea, "Park, S. J.", Korea Rural Economic Institute, ~ (2007)
  24. Pérez, P. E., "How to Quantify the Qualitative Aspects of Nursing Outcomes Classification Scales with Psychosociocultural Indicators", Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 47(3), pp.728~735 (2012)
  25. Picciotto, R., "Evaluation and Poverty Reduction", Proceedings from a World Bank Conference (2000), World Bank
  26. Seong, J. G., "Need to change Agricultural Policy Paradigm" (2004), Samsung Economic Research Institute
  27. Non-trade Concerns: Strategies for the DDA Negotiation on Agriculture, "Song, Y. C.", Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, ~ (2002)
  28. Walker, T., "Impact Assessment of Policy-oriented International Agricultural Research: Evidence and Insights from Case Studies", World Development, 38(10), pp.1453~1461 (2010)
  29. Woods, M., "Rural Geography" (2005), Sage Publications
  30. Yu, S. G., "Current Status and Future Direction of Comprehensive Rural Village Development Projects", Proceedings on Korean Regional Development Conference (2006), The Korean Regional Development Association

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)