그린케어(Green Care) 도입을 위한 시설과 프로그램 유형분류 및 중요도 분석
Classification and Prioritizing the Importance of the Facility and Program for Green Care Introduction
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to survey and analyze the operating state and characteristics of domestic and foreign green care, prioritize the facilities and programs for green care introduction through expert survey of importance, and thereby to provide a basic material for introducing green care in facilities in Rural Development Project districts, including domestic rural experience facilities. Domestic and foreign literature was analyzed in order to classify the necessary facilities programs, of green care, and the analysis results were modified and supplemented through Expert Delphi Survey. Based on the results, AHP based importance survey was conducted. In terms of the facilities and programs for green care introduction, necessary facilities (H/W) were categorized into four types (accommodation facility, resting facility, experience facility, therapy facility) and S/W programs into three types (learning experience type, therapy type, and care type). To verify the reliability of the AHP based importance survey, Consistency Index (C.I.) was analyzed. As a result, the C.I. value of nine respondents ranged from 0.000 to 0.083 so that the survey was found to have high consistency. The importance of S/W programs was 0.627, and that of H/W facilities was 0.373. For green care introduction, programs were found to be more important. Regarding the categories of necessary facilities, therapy facility had the highest value, or 0.348; experience facility 0.253; accommodation facility 0.211; resting facility 0.188. Therefore, therapy facility and experience facility were found to be important. In case of S/W programs, therapy type had the highest value, or 0.499, and learning experience type (0.255) and care type (0.246) were similarly important. Generally, the categories that had high importance values tended to show a remarkable difference in importance of their sub categories. In particular, facilities or therapy programs using natural ecology and forests were found to be highly important. In conclusion, it is required to actively review the introduction of active programs using resources, such as existing experience facilities and accommodation facilities and villages forests, and programs making the body and soul comfortable, such as natural ecology experience, Green Shower, and horticulture activity.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to survey and analyze the operating state and characteristics of domestic and foreign green care, prioritize the facilities and programs for green care introduction through expert survey of importance, and thereby to provide a basic material for introducing green care in facilities in Rural Development Project districts, including domestic rural experience facilities. Domestic and foreign literature was analyzed in order to classify the necessary facilities programs, of green care, and the analysis results were modified and supplemented through Expert Delphi Survey. Based on the results, AHP based importance survey was conducted. In terms of the facilities and programs for green care introduction, necessary facilities (H/W) were categorized into four types (accommodation facility, resting facility, experience facility, therapy facility) and S/W programs into three types (learning experience type, therapy type, and care type). To verify the reliability of the AHP based importance survey, Consistency Index (C.I.) was analyzed. As a result, the C.I. value of nine respondents ranged from 0.000 to 0.083 so that the survey was found to have high consistency. The importance of S/W programs was 0.627, and that of H/W facilities was 0.373. For green care introduction, programs were found to be more important. Regarding the categories of necessary facilities, therapy facility had the highest value, or 0.348; experience facility 0.253; accommodation facility 0.211; resting facility 0.188. Therefore, therapy facility and experience facility were found to be important. In case of S/W programs, therapy type had the highest value, or 0.499, and learning experience type (0.255) and care type (0.246) were similarly important. Generally, the categories that had high importance values tended to show a remarkable difference in importance of their sub categories. In particular, facilities or therapy programs using natural ecology and forests were found to be highly important. In conclusion, it is required to actively review the introduction of active programs using resources, such as existing experience facilities and accommodation facilities and villages forests, and programs making the body and soul comfortable, such as natural ecology experience, Green Shower, and horticulture activity.
참고문헌 (15)
- Choi, Y.W, "The Classification and Activation Strategy of Rural Development Projects", Master, pp.2010
- 최영완, "농어촌용수 및 농업생산기반시설에 대한 기후변화 취약성 관련인자 중요도 평가", 농촌계획, 25(1), pp.75~87 (2019), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- Di lacovo, Francesco, "Supporting Policies for Social Farming in Europe", Preogressing Multifunctioality in Responsive Rural Areas, Agenzia Regionale per lo Sviluppo e l`Innovazione nel settore Agricolo-forestale(Arsia) (2009)
- Gim, G.M, "‘농업의 치유기능’에 대한 이해와 최근 동향", Gyeongsang National University Seminar Presentation (2015)
- 김경미, "한국 치유농업의 현황 및 특성 분석", 농촌지도와 개발, 20(4), pp.909~936 (2013), 한국농촌지도학회[DOI]
- Farming for Health. Green-care Farming Across Europe and the United States of America, "Hassink, J.", Springer, ~, pp.Wageningen UR Frontis series vol. 13 (2006)
- Haubenhofer, Elingsir, "The Development of Green Care in Western European Countries", Explore, 6(2), pp.107~ (2010)
- Haugan, L., "Green care in Norway: farms as a resource for the educational, health and social sector, Frontis, Volume 13 Farming for Health: Green-Care Farming across Europe and the United States of America Chapter 9", 109~126 (2005)
- Care Farming in the UK: Evidence and Opportunities, "Hine, R", University of Essex, ~ (2008)
- 김아라, "국내 그린케어 운영실태 조사 분석", 농촌계획, 22(1), pp.69~79 (2016), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- 김진옥, "한국형 치유관광의 개념모델 정립 및 치유효과 분석에 관한 연구: 자연기반 아웃도어레크리에이션 참여자를 중심으로", 관광연구저널, 31(5), pp.5~21 (2017), 한국관광연구학회[DOI]
- Kim, S. H., "의사결정분석 및 응용", pp.337~340 (2006), Youngji Publishers
- 녹색농업치유단지 조성사업 타당성 조사 연구 – 최종보고서, "Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs", ~ (2016)
- International Survey of Green Care in Agriculture and Development of Strategy in Domestic, "Rural Development Administration", RDA, ~ (2013)
- Strategic Long Term Planning of Green Care Based on Agrohealing Survey, "Rural Development Administration", National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, ~ (2013)
