본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

품질성공요소가 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 비교연구: 기업규모를 중심으로

A Comparative Study of the Success Factors of Quality on Business Performance : Focused on Business Scale

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산업공학

초록

The purpose of this study is to observe effect on a result of a business performance depending on the business scale and the success factors of quality. Verified hypothesis of the quality of success factors and business performance are conducted in order to conduct this research. The results of hypothesis testing can be summarized as follows : First, depending on the size of the company, quality of corporate success factors in the management and significant positive was verified to be in effect. Second, depending on the size of the small business companies' human resource management, product/process is significantly positive in effect and medium companies’ quality information, quality of suppliers in the commercialization of technology is significantly positive in effect. Third, depending on the size of the small business companies’ human resource management, product/process financial performance is significantly positive in effect and mid-sized companies, suppliers in the quality significantly positive show the influence of financial performance. The results of measurement through the size of the enterprise and the successful factors of quality impacts on business performance directly.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to observe effect on a result of a business performance depending on the business scale and the success factors of quality. Verified hypothesis of the quality of success factors and business performance are conducted in order to conduct this research. The results of hypothesis testing can be summarized as follows : First, depending on the size of the company, quality of corporate success factors in the management and significant positive was verified to be in effect. Second, depending on the size of the small business companies' human resource management, product/process is significantly positive in effect and medium companies’ quality information, quality of suppliers in the commercialization of technology is significantly positive in effect. Third, depending on the size of the small business companies’ human resource management, product/process financial performance is significantly positive in effect and mid-sized companies, suppliers in the quality significantly positive show the influence of financial performance. The results of measurement through the size of the enterprise and the successful factors of quality impacts on business performance directly.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 金正泰, "품질경영발전단계에 따른 품질경영 성공요인", 박사, pp.1994
  2. 노부호, "한국기업의 전략적 품질경영과 경영성과", 품질경영학회지, 27(1), pp.1~16 (1999)
  3. 서창석, "품질경영요인이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증 연구", 서강대학교 경영논문, 8 (2003)
  4. Asif, M., "Process embedded design of integrated management systems", International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 26(3), pp.261~282 (2009)
  5. Deming, W. E., "Out of the crisis, Cambridge" (1986), MIT Center for Advanced Engineering
  6. Ɖordević, D., "Development of integrated management systems in SMES in Serbia", Management, 5(2), pp.99~114 (2010)
  7. Dulworth, M. R., "Employ involvement systems in U. S. corporations : Right objectives, wrong strategies", National Productivity Review, 9(2), pp.141~156 (1990)
  8. Evans, R., "In Defence of TQM", Magazing, 7(1) (1995)
  9. Flynn, B. B., "A framework for international quality management research and an associated measurement instrument", Journal of Operations Management, 11(4), pp.339~366 (1994)
  10. Foley, O., "The impact of diverse information systems environments on information quality-A design science approach", Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, pp.77~85 (2010)
  11. Garvin, D. A., "Japanese quality management", The Columbia Journal of World Business, 19, pp.3~12 (1984)
  12. Gibson, T. C., "Helping leaders accept leadership of total quality management", Quality Progress, pp.45~47 (1990)
  13. Gilbert, R. J., "Are you committed or committed?", Quality Progress, pp.45~48 (1990)
  14. Godfrey, A. B., "Ten areas for future research in total quality management", Quality Management Journal, 1, pp.47~70 (1993)
  15. Goetsch, D., "Introduction to total quality : Quality, productivity, competitiveness (2nd ed.)", pp.24~34 (1994), Macmillan
  16. Hoyle, D., "Quality System Handbook. 2nd ed" (1994), Butter worth-Heinemann
  17. Joseph, L. C., "Sourcing and supplier management" (1994), Anderson Consulting
  18. Joyce, P., "Small firms : Contribution to economic regeneration" (1996), The Institute For Small Business Affairs
  19. Juran, J. M., "The Quality trilogy", Quality Progress, pp.12~24 (1986)
  20. Kargra, L., "Strategic planning emphasis and planning satisfaction in small firms : An empirical investigation", Journal of Business Strategies, 13(1), pp.42~64 (1996)
  21. Leonard, F., "The incline of quality", pp.163~171 (1982), Harvard Business Review
  22. March, J. G., "Exploitation and exploration in organizational learning", Organization Science, 2, pp.71~87 (1991)
  23. Miller, D., "Chief Executive Personality and Corporate Strategy and Structure", Management Science, 32, pp.1389~1409 (1986)
  24. Mitchell, W., "Survival commercialize complex goods", Strategic of businesses using collaborative relationships to Management Journal, 17(3), pp.169~195 (1996)
  25. How Donald Peterson turned Ford around, "Peterson, D.", ~ (1992)
  26. Rao, S. S., "A framework for international quality management research : Development and validation of a measurement instrument", Total Quality Management, 10(7), pp.1047~1075 (1999)
  27. Saraph. J. V., "An instrument for measuring the critical factor of quality management", Decision Science, 20, pp.810~829 (1989)
  28. Zairi, M., "Does TQM Impact on Bottom-Line Results?", The TQM Magazing, 6(1), pp.40~ (1994)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)