본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

가치전략 중점의 변화가 재무성과에 미치는 영향

The Financial Impact Generated by Shifts in Value Strategic Emphasis

박광호|홍기철
한국산업경영시스템학회 (KOREAN SOCIETY OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING)|2016.12|한국산업경영시스템학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering)|제39권 제4호|pp. 26-39

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Value CreationStrategic EmphasisValue AppropriationValue Strategy
주제분류산업공학

초록

Korea’s main manufacturing industries, which have led its economy for the past three decades, are faced with a serious downturn and loss of competitive advantages due to the current economic depression, China’s rise, and the drop of oil prices. Korean business firms must adopt the paradigm shift in their value strategies, along with a government-led industrial restructuring in order to gain sustainable competitive advantages. Business firms allocate their limited resources between value creation and value appropriation, however, what effect does strategic emphasis on value creation versus value appropriation have on a business firm's financial performance? This paper empirically addresses this issue by examining the effect of shifts in strategic emphasis on stock return. Furthermore, this study examines appropriate choices of strategic emphasis to gain differential financial performance. The data set used in this regression analysis comes from the KISLINE database of NICE Information Service. The variables that form the basis of this analysis are stock return, ROA, and Strategic Emphasis [(advertising expenditures-R&D expenditures)/ assets]. The interactive effect with situational factors regarding the firm and the type of technological environment in which the firm is operating was also analyzed. Our results show that investors acknowledge a shift of strategic emphasis as a sign of stock valuation. In comparison to US, Korean business firms have weak value creation capabilities in high-technology industries, and weak value appropriation capabilities in low-technology industries. This proves Korean firms are fast followers in the global market. Our findings suggest that Korean firms have to adopt a balanced value strategy, nurturing value creation and developing value appropriation for overcoming the current economic downturn and becoming a first mover in the dawn of “Industry 4.0.”

Abstract

Korea’s main manufacturing industries, which have led its economy for the past three decades, are faced with a serious downturn and loss of competitive advantages due to the current economic depression, China’s rise, and the drop of oil prices. Korean business firms must adopt the paradigm shift in their value strategies, along with a government-led industrial restructuring in order to gain sustainable competitive advantages. Business firms allocate their limited resources between value creation and value appropriation, however, what effect does strategic emphasis on value creation versus value appropriation have on a business firm's financial performance? This paper empirically addresses this issue by examining the effect of shifts in strategic emphasis on stock return. Furthermore, this study examines appropriate choices of strategic emphasis to gain differential financial performance. The data set used in this regression analysis comes from the KISLINE database of NICE Information Service. The variables that form the basis of this analysis are stock return, ROA, and Strategic Emphasis [(advertising expenditures-R&D expenditures)/ assets]. The interactive effect with situational factors regarding the firm and the type of technological environment in which the firm is operating was also analyzed. Our results show that investors acknowledge a shift of strategic emphasis as a sign of stock valuation. In comparison to US, Korean business firms have weak value creation capabilities in high-technology industries, and weak value appropriation capabilities in low-technology industries. This proves Korean firms are fast followers in the global market. Our findings suggest that Korean firms have to adopt a balanced value strategy, nurturing value creation and developing value appropriation for overcoming the current economic downturn and becoming a first mover in the dawn of “Industry 4.0.”

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Aaker, D.A., "Measuring Brand Equity Across Products and Markets", California Management Review, 38(3), pp.102~121 (1996)
  2. Anderson, J. C., "Customer Value Propositions in Business Markets", Harvard Business Review, 84, pp.90~99 (2006)
  3. Asley, R., "Advertising and Aggregate Consumption : An Analysis of Causality", Econometrica, 48(5), pp.1149~1167 (1980)
  4. Bowman, C., "Value Creation Versus Value Capture: Towards a Coherent Definition of Value in Strategy", British Journal of Management, 11(1), pp.1~15 (2000)
  5. Brandenburger, A. D., "Value-Based Business Strategy", Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 5(1), pp.5~24 (1996)
  6. Chandler, A. D., "The Competitive Performance of U.S. Industrial Enterprises Since the Second World War", Business History Review, 68(1), pp.1~72 (1994)
  7. "Korea’s Economy is a Toothless Tiger in Winter" (2015)[URL]
  8. Denison, E.F., "The Sources of Economic Growth in the United States" (1962), Committee for Economic Development
  9. "Use the Mes to the Crisis Insensitivity, 2015-12-17" (2015)[URL]
  10. Erickson, G., "Gaining Comparative Advantage Through Discretionary Expenditures : the Returns to R&D and Advertising", Management Science, 38(9), pp.1264~1279 (1992)
  11. Gatignon, H., "Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance", Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), pp.77~90 (1997)
  12. Golder, P. N., "Historical method in Marketing Research with New Evidence on Long-Term Market Share Stability", Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), pp.156~172 (2000)
  13. Grant, R., "The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage : Implications for Strategy Formulation", California Management Review, 33(3), pp.114~135 (1991)
  14. Griliches, Z., "Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change", pp.52~89 (1995), Blackwell Publishers
  15. 한상훈, "품질경영 활동이 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향: 국가품질상 수상 제조기업을 중심으로", 품질경영학회지, 42(4), pp.729~746 (2014), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
  16. Harrison, J. S., "Resource Allocation as an Outcropping of Strategic Consistency :Performance Implications", Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), pp.1026~1051 (1993)
  17. Kessides, I.N., "the Dynamics of Company Profits" (1990), Cambridge University Press
  18. Kleinbaum, D.G., "Applied Regression Analysis and Multivariable Methods", pp.115~117 (1998), Duxbury
  19. 이한웅, "정부지원이 중소기업 글로벌 R&D 협력 성과와 글로벌 역량에 미치는 영향", 산업경영시스템학회지, 37(4), pp.177~186 (2014), 한국산업경영시스템학회
  20. Lei, D., "Dynamic Core Competencies Through Meta-Learning and Strategic Context", Journal of Management, 22(4), pp.549~569 (1996)
  21. Levin, R. C., "Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3, pp.783~831 (1987)
  22. Lumley, T., "The Importance of the Normality Assumption in Large Public Health Data Sets", Annu, Rev. Public Health, 23, pp.151~169 (2002)
  23. "SeAh Steel, Solving Bad Factor, 2016-10-5" (2016)[URL]
  24. "Top 10 Conglomerates Sit on Record Cash Reserve"[URL]
  25. Mansfield, E., "Social and Private Rates of Return From Industrial Innovation", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(2), pp.221~240 (1977)
  26. Mizik, N., "Trading Off between Value Creation and Value Appropriation : the Financial Implications of Shifts in Strategic Emphasis", Journal of Marketing, 67(1), pp.63~76 (2003)
  27. "Korea’s Crisis of Scientific and Technology, 2016-6-10" (2016)[URL]
  28. Park, B.-J., "Statistics For Business and Economic Using MS Excel & ETEX", pp.592~ (2013), Sigmapress
  29. 박광호, "전략 패러다임 시프트를 위한 균형적 가치전략 프레임워크", 한국경영공학회지, 20(1), pp.111~146 (2015), 한국경영공학회
  30. Industry Competitiveness Analysis of Korea, "Park, S.-R.", Korea Economic Research Institute, 2~226 (2009)
  31. Peteraf, M. A., "The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage : A Resource-Based View", Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), pp.179~191 (1993)
  32. Multiple Regression, "Rob, K.", Minitab Assistant, ~ (2014)
  33. Schumpeter, J.A., "Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy" (1942), Harper and Row
  34. "WTO against US Anti-Dumping Duties on Korea Washer Makers, 2016-9-8" (2016)[URL]
  35. Solow, R.M., "Technical Change and the Aggregate Production function", Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), pp.312~320 (1957)
  36. Srivastava, R. K., "Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value : A Framework for Analysis", Journal of Marketing, 62(1), pp.2~18 (1998)
  37. Teece, D. J., "the Competitive Challenge : Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal" (1987), Ballinger Publishing Company
  38. Woodruff, R.B., "Customer Value : the Next Source for Competitive Advantage", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), pp.139~153 (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

주력산업에서 가치전략과 재무성과의 상관관계박광호, 홍기철한국산업경영시스템학회 · 한국산업경영시스템학회지2018 · 제41권 제1호전략적 강조가 기업 가치에 미치는 영향: Tobin’s Q를 활용한 KOSDAQ 150 기업 분석김동미, 박광호한국산업경영시스템학회 · 한국산업경영시스템학회지2025 · 제48권 제1호가치 창조 및 전유 요소가 기업의 성과에 미치는 영향김철민, 박광호한국산업경영시스템학회 · 한국산업경영시스템학회지2017 · 제40권 제4호The Effects of Resource Investments and Diversification Strategy on Firm Value : Evidence from Small－ and Medium－sized Ventures in Korea주흠, 권영모, 오한모한국국제회계학회 · 국제회계연구2019 · 제83호연구개발투자 지출이 기업의 시장가치에 미치는 영향: 유통산업을 중심으로김진회한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2019 · 제17권 제1호한국기업의 가치혁신 전략 : 제조업을 중심으로정규석한국품질경영학회 · 품질경영학회지2010 · 제38권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)

Profile의 Composite와 Multiple Single-Segment Control의 비교 연구장성호, 라두완, 김준호pp. 1-6판매자-구매자 생산-재고통합 문제를 위한 Mixed Approach이동주pp. 7-14전자제품 제조사 관점에서의 공급사슬 특성을 고려한 재고비용 산정 기준의 제시남정훈, 황승준pp. 15-25산학 기술 협력 참여기업의 참여목적, 참여프로그램, 만족도 평가배성문, 이상천, 박종훈pp. 40-48야전 치명고장자료를 이용한 함정전투체계 신뢰성 분석 및 활용 방안최봉완, 김영진, 오현승pp. 49-59
원문 보기