본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

주력산업에서 가치전략과 재무성과의 상관관계

Correlation between Value Strategies and Financial Performance in Leading Industries

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산업공학

초록

Korea’s five leading industries-chemical, automobile, shipbuilding, metal and electronics-have been the growth engines of the Korean economy for the last 30 years. However, with their performance weakening in the past few years, Korea’s annual growth rate has dropped to less than 2%. Just as the Japanese economy struggled through the lost decades, Korea’s leading industries have been facing signals of arriving at a Strategic Inflection Point (“SIP”) since the mid-2000s. The objective of this study is to present an appropriate value strategy for Korean firms in leading industries to gain sustainable competitive advantages. This paper examines the following issues : First, it diagnoses the signs and timing of SIP for the five leading industries. Second, this study examines 78 Korean and Japanese firms in order to understand the adaptation strategies of the highest and lowest performing firms from a value strategy point of view. Third, it empirically analyzes the correlation between the indicators of value strategy and the accounting performances of the Korean and Japanese firms. The data set used in the cluster analysis were collected from KISLINE database of NICE Information Service and annual reports. The findings in the case analyses of high and low performing companies show that high value-added specialty chemical materials and electronic component manufacturers that had a strong focus on value creation were defined as high performing companies. And in the cosmetic and automobile industries, companies with a strong emphasis on value appropriation gained high performance. Furthermore, the study conducted a cluster analysis based on two indicators R&D and advertisement expense. The analysis shows that a significant gap exists in the operating incomes among three groups classified under the value strategy. The study recommends that Korean firms are requested to increase R&D expenditure, conduct M&A and collaborate with companies that own source technologies to narrow the technology gap and improve their segment portfolio from commodity to value-added products.

Abstract

Korea’s five leading industries-chemical, automobile, shipbuilding, metal and electronics-have been the growth engines of the Korean economy for the last 30 years. However, with their performance weakening in the past few years, Korea’s annual growth rate has dropped to less than 2%. Just as the Japanese economy struggled through the lost decades, Korea’s leading industries have been facing signals of arriving at a Strategic Inflection Point (“SIP”) since the mid-2000s. The objective of this study is to present an appropriate value strategy for Korean firms in leading industries to gain sustainable competitive advantages. This paper examines the following issues : First, it diagnoses the signs and timing of SIP for the five leading industries. Second, this study examines 78 Korean and Japanese firms in order to understand the adaptation strategies of the highest and lowest performing firms from a value strategy point of view. Third, it empirically analyzes the correlation between the indicators of value strategy and the accounting performances of the Korean and Japanese firms. The data set used in the cluster analysis were collected from KISLINE database of NICE Information Service and annual reports. The findings in the case analyses of high and low performing companies show that high value-added specialty chemical materials and electronic component manufacturers that had a strong focus on value creation were defined as high performing companies. And in the cosmetic and automobile industries, companies with a strong emphasis on value appropriation gained high performance. Furthermore, the study conducted a cluster analysis based on two indicators R&D and advertisement expense. The analysis shows that a significant gap exists in the operating incomes among three groups classified under the value strategy. The study recommends that Korean firms are requested to increase R&D expenditure, conduct M&A and collaborate with companies that own source technologies to narrow the technology gap and improve their segment portfolio from commodity to value-added products.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. Ahn, H.S., "Subaru" (2015)
  2. Bok, D.K., "Strategies for Overcoming the Slow Growth" (2014)
  3. Brandenburger, A.D., "Value-Based Business Strategy", Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 5(1), pp.5~24 (1996)
  4. Burgelman, R.A., "Strategic Dynamics : Concepts and Cases" (2005), McGraw-Hill
  5. Vision and Development Strategies for Leading Industries, KIET Research, 2016-12, "Cho, C.", ~ (2016)
  6. Cho, C., "Vision and Development Strategies for Leading Industries", KIET Monthly Industrial Economics (2017)
  7. 조영곤, "지배주주 지분율과 연구개발 투자: 중국 상장기업을 대상으로", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 17(12), pp.162~169 (2016), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
  8. Choi, J.H., "Hyundai Motor's Downturn and Credit Rating" (2017)
  9. Choi, J.H., "Group Research : Hyundai Motor" (2017)
  10. Dong, Y.H., "Group Research and Credit Issue : Samsung" (2017)
  11. Dong-A Ilbo, "Hyundai Motor's Customized Cars in China", ~ (2017)
  12. Golder, P.N., "Historical Method in Marketing Research with New Evidence on Long-Term Market Share Stability", Journal of Marketing Research, (37), pp.156~172 (2000)
  13. Griliches, Z., "R&D and Productivity, in Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change", pp.52~89 (1995), Blackwell Publishers
  14. Hong, J.P., "Business Strategies of Amorepacific and LG H&H" (2012)
  15. 홍기철, "한국과 일본 화학산업에서 사업 포트폴리오와 R&D가 경영성과에 미치는 영향", 한국경영공학회지, 22(3), pp.95~118 (2017), 한국경영공학회[DOI]
  16. 홍기철, "가치전략 중점의 변화가 재무성과에 미치는 영향", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 39(4), pp.26~39 (2016), 한국산업경영시스템학회
  17. Dongbu Steel, Credit Rating Report, "Hwang, S.H.", NICE Investors Service, ~ (2017)
  18. Posco, Credit Rating Report, "Hwang, S.H.", NICE Investors Service, ~ (2017)
  19. "ICIS Top 100 Chemical Companies", ICIS Chemical Business, (5-11), pp.27~37 (2016)
  20. Jang, Y.K., "Managerial Analysis", pp.349~358 (2014), Muyok Public
  21. Kessides, I.N., "The Dynamics of Company Profits" (1990), Cambridge University Press
  22. LG Chem' Rating Report, "Kim, B.J.", Korea Investors Service, ~ (2017)
  23. Kim, C.H., "Global AI Startups Trends", Electrics and Telecommunications Research Institute, 32(4), pp.1~10 (2017)
  24. 김철민, "가치 창조 및 전유 요소가 기업의 성과에 미치는 영향", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 40(4), pp.1~9 (2017), 한국산업경영시스템학회
  25. Kim, D.H., "The Story behind Subaru's Amazing Success", The Economist (2016)
  26. Kim, H.J, "SPSS 23, Topbooks", ~ (2016)
  27. Kim, Y.Y., "Necessity and Challenges of Enhancing Technical Capability", KIET Monthly Industrial Economics (2014)
  28. "Korea Economic Daily, Nidec Corp., Murata Manufacturing Co." (2015)[URL]
  29. Korea Economic Daily, "Samsung's Brand Value", ~ (2017)
  30. Korea JoongAng Daily, "Heavy Industries Looking for Enhancing Segment Portfolio", ~ (2017)
  31. Korea JoongAng Daily, "Korea, which Produced the Hydrogen Car for the First Time, Stopped, due to Lack of Charging Stations", ~ (2017)
  32. "Korea JoongAng Daily, Murata Manufacturing Co." (2001)[URL]
  33. Korea JoongAng Daily, "Why did Sharp fall?", ~ (2016)
  34. Kukminilbo, "No Industrial Policy Is Seen", ~ (2017)
  35. Enhancing Competitiveness in Leading Industries, "Lee, J.W.", Kexim Overseas Economic Research Institute, ~ (2016)
  36. Conditions of Sustainable Growth for Global Leading Industries, KIET Research, 2011-609, "Lee, K.S.", ~ (2011)
  37. Lee, Y.K., "Group Research : Hyundai Heavy Industries" (2017)
  38. Maeil Business Newspaper, "Perfect Storm over Korea", ~ (2016)
  39. Mizik, N., "Trading Off between Value Creation and Value Appropriation : the Financial Implications of Shifts in Strategic Emphasis", Journal of Marketing, 67(1), pp.63~76 (2003)
  40. Moneytoday, "Genesis G90, 5th rank in America's Large Car Market", ~ (2017)
  41. Noh, J.U., "Rating Methodology : Shipbuilding Industry" (2013)
  42. 박광호, "전략 패러다임 시프트를 위한 균형적 가치전략 프레임워크", 한국경영공학회지, 20(1), pp.111~146 (2015), 한국경영공학회
  43. Park, S.J., "Rating Methodology : Automobile Industry" (2015)
  44. Peteraf, M.A., "The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage : A Resource-Based View", Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), pp.179~191 (1993)[DOI]
  45. Porter, M.E., "How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition", Harvard Business Review, pp.64~88 (2014)
  46. Seoul Economic Daily, "Clarksons Research, the Age for Korea to be the Sole Lead in the Ultra Large Carriers is over", ~ (2017)
  47. Seoul Economic Daily, "Lotte, the 1st rank in Chemical, SK, Jumping in Semiconductor", ~ (2017)
  48. Shannon, M., "The Japanese Chemical Industry : Finding the Right Path" (2011)
  49. Global Competitiveness Comparison in Leading Industries, Korea Economic Research Institute, Policy Research, 2016-01, "Shin, H.H.", ~ (2016)
  50. Corporate Restructuring and its Macro Effects, IMF Working Paper, WP, "17", 17, pp.2017, ~
  51. So, H., "Innovation in the Japanese Chemical Industry, Which Supports World Electronics Industry, Seijo", Economic Papers, (204), pp.97~116 (2014)
  52. AMOS Statistical Analysis, "SPSS", pp.2015, Song, J.J.

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)