유도계획과 QM 도구들을 활용한 신제품 개발과정의 혁신 전략
Innovation Strategy For New Product Development Process by Indicative Planning & QM Tools
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The new businesses started by the companies usually results in being unsuccessful. The main reasons for that are either aiming targeting wrong customers, unsatisfaction of customers’ requesting quality standards, or taking wrong actions against the competitors in the market. Therefore, companies should aim the targets for the newly developing products based on the fulfilling values for the customers when they start the new businesses, and should take good cares for risk managements at the each step of the new business to prevent the failure in advance. In addition to that, the companies starting new businesses not only need to take the customers attributes (CA) into account, but they also should apply the new technologies as one system to initiate a new business to satisfy the basic wants of the customers. This article suggests the New Product Development Pursuing Model using the Indicative Planning methodology and the Quality Management tools. The New Product Development Pursuing Model would be completed by the following steps as below; 1. Drawing the CTQ (Critical To Quality) for setting up the new product development objectives by : i) using the VOC (Voice Of Customers) obtained by the QFD (Quality Function Deploypment) if the market is mature, ii) applying AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) to information in the QIS (Quality Information System) if the market is unmature to get enough need information of the customers. 2. Risk Management in NPD : The NPD pursuing model consisted of the IP (indicative planning) is suggested not by the process of top-down-way mandatory planning process, but by the tools used in the administrative science and economic fields, namely by governance. The companies could apply innovative methodology for new products development processes to fulfil the customers satisfaction in the fields, through the CA (Contingency Approach) of the NPD (New Product Development) process.
Abstract
The new businesses started by the companies usually results in being unsuccessful. The main reasons for that are either aiming targeting wrong customers, unsatisfaction of customers’ requesting quality standards, or taking wrong actions against the competitors in the market. Therefore, companies should aim the targets for the newly developing products based on the fulfilling values for the customers when they start the new businesses, and should take good cares for risk managements at the each step of the new business to prevent the failure in advance. In addition to that, the companies starting new businesses not only need to take the customers attributes (CA) into account, but they also should apply the new technologies as one system to initiate a new business to satisfy the basic wants of the customers. This article suggests the New Product Development Pursuing Model using the Indicative Planning methodology and the Quality Management tools. The New Product Development Pursuing Model would be completed by the following steps as below; 1. Drawing the CTQ (Critical To Quality) for setting up the new product development objectives by : i) using the VOC (Voice Of Customers) obtained by the QFD (Quality Function Deploypment) if the market is mature, ii) applying AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) to information in the QIS (Quality Information System) if the market is unmature to get enough need information of the customers. 2. Risk Management in NPD : The NPD pursuing model consisted of the IP (indicative planning) is suggested not by the process of top-down-way mandatory planning process, but by the tools used in the administrative science and economic fields, namely by governance. The companies could apply innovative methodology for new products development processes to fulfil the customers satisfaction in the fields, through the CA (Contingency Approach) of the NPD (New Product Development) process.
참고문헌 (25)
- Brown, S.L., "Product development :past research, present findings, and future directions", Academy of Management Review, 20(2), pp.343~378 (1995)
- Cho, C.W., "Analysis of Technology roadmap usage for Product-Service Systems", Korean Management Science Review, Annual Conference, pp.790~797 (2010)
- Dyer, J. S., "Remarks on the Analytical Hierarchy Process", Management Science, 36(3), pp.249~258 (1990)
- Goedkoop, M. J., "Product service system, ecological and economic basics", Report for Dutch Ministries of Environment (VROM) and Economic Affairs (EZ), 36(1), pp.1~222 (1999)
- 홍인기, "업무프로세스 운용 효율성 개선을 위한 린 생산방식과 식스시그마-DFSS 통합모델 개발", 한국경영공학회지, 12(1), pp.25~38 (2007), 한국경영공학회
- Jang, J. S., "A Study on Performing FMEA Effectively", Journal of the Korean Institute of Plant Engineering, 4(4), pp.69~77 (1999)
- 주종문, "고객관계관리(CRM)을 위한 VOC분석 시스템 구축", 품질경영학회지, 32(1), pp.75~91 (2004), 한국품질경영학회
- 정철호, "기술혁신 유형에 따른 시장지향성과 창조성이 신제품 성과에 미치는 영향: 대전지역 기업을 중심으로", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 12(9), pp.3869~3877 (2011), 한국산학기술학회
- Jung, T. W., "A Study on CTQ-CTP Analysis for a Quality Information System using AHP", master, consulting, pp.2013
- 김호, "중소기업의 신제품 개발 성과결정요인에 관한 연구", 대한경영학회지, 28(11), pp.2851~2881 (2015), 대한경영학회
- 김정현, "소비자생활 관점의 제품-서비스 시스템(Product Service System) 분석과 소비자의 구매의도", 소비자학연구, 27(5), pp.83~109 (2016), 한국소비자학회
- Kim, T, "A Study on the Evaluation of Priority of Manufacturing Performance Improvement Techniques Using AHP : focused on the case of shipbuilding enterprise", Business Administration, pp.2008
- KIT QM Lab, "Design-inSystem", KIT QM Lab, ~ (2015)
- 문경원, "Kano-QFD 통합모형에서의 고객 요구속성 중요도 산정", 산업경영시스템학회지, 37(1), pp.68~78 (2014), 한국산업경영시스템학회
- 문윤지, "신제품 개발 단계에서 사업부 기능 간 협력이 신제품 개발역량과 개발성과에 미치는 영향", 대한경영학회지, 24(4), pp.2105~2120 (2011), 대한경영학회
- Nambisan, S., "Designing Virtual Customer Environments for New Product Development : Toward Theory", Academy of Management Review, 27(3), pp.392~413 (2002)
- Park, E. T., "The Korean Economic-Development Plan" (1995), Kyeongyeonsa
- 박노국, "신제품개발 성공을 위한 기능분석 적용사례", 벤처창업연구, 9(4), pp.155~161 (2014), 한국벤처창업학회
- Park, R. K., "A Study on the Function Evaluation using Q.F.D and A.H.P", Journal of KSQC, 21(2), pp.85~92 (1993)
- Rho, H. J., "A Study on the Design Review and New Products Development", Journal of The Korean Institute of Office Automation, 5(4), pp.131~139 (2000)
- Saaty, T. L., "The Analytic Hierarchy Process" (1980), McGraw-Hill International
- SERI Report, "SERI", SERI, ~ (2012)
- Song, I. C., "A Study on the Commercialization of Technological Innovation1) for market Dominant Item in Infant Small-sized venture-Focus on Water Purifier with New Sparking Module", master, Industrial Engineering, pp.2015
- A Study on the User-Centered Innovation Model, "Song, W.J.", Science & Technology Policy Institute, 38~39, pp.Policy Research, No. 2004-17 (2004)
- Zahedi, F.M., "The Analytic Hierarchy Process : A Survey of the Method and Its Application", Interfaces, 96~108 (1986)