사물인터넷 표준화의 상대적 중요도 결정을 위한 계층분석방법 응용
Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process for Relative Importance Determination of Internet of Things Standardization
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As one of recent issues in the information and communication industry, internet of things has attracted attention to provide intelligent infrastructure services which connect and share data and information between real and virtual world. According to the development of these internet of things technologies, types of machines, telecommunication devices, and terminals are increasing tremendously. In this situation, connectivity and interoperability between internet of things components are important issues to build a hyper connected society. To visualize this society, it is important to set up and develop information and communication technology (ICT) standards among stakeholders. However, under limited budget and human resources, it is essential to rank standardization work items for setting standards with respect to efficiency. The purpose of this study is to provide a method for setting standardization strategies within group decision making. As a multi-criteria group decision making tool, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is adopted and applied to determine the priorities of setting work items. The proposed method first defines decision making problem with objective, criteria, and alternatives which produces a hierarchy consisting of upper and lower criteria. Then, pairwise comparisons of academy and public sector experts are performed with respect to their relative meaning and importance. Individual surveys of expert groups are collected and summarized to determine relative criteria importance measures. Furthermore, to deliver reliable importance criteria measures, differences between academy and public sector expert groups are compared and tested using Mann-Whitney non-parametric test. The results are illustrated for useful guidelines to practical group decision making in standardization strategy establishments.
Abstract
As one of recent issues in the information and communication industry, internet of things has attracted attention to provide intelligent infrastructure services which connect and share data and information between real and virtual world. According to the development of these internet of things technologies, types of machines, telecommunication devices, and terminals are increasing tremendously. In this situation, connectivity and interoperability between internet of things components are important issues to build a hyper connected society. To visualize this society, it is important to set up and develop information and communication technology (ICT) standards among stakeholders. However, under limited budget and human resources, it is essential to rank standardization work items for setting standards with respect to efficiency. The purpose of this study is to provide a method for setting standardization strategies within group decision making. As a multi-criteria group decision making tool, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is adopted and applied to determine the priorities of setting work items. The proposed method first defines decision making problem with objective, criteria, and alternatives which produces a hierarchy consisting of upper and lower criteria. Then, pairwise comparisons of academy and public sector experts are performed with respect to their relative meaning and importance. Individual surveys of expert groups are collected and summarized to determine relative criteria importance measures. Furthermore, to deliver reliable importance criteria measures, differences between academy and public sector expert groups are compared and tested using Mann-Whitney non-parametric test. The results are illustrated for useful guidelines to practical group decision making in standardization strategy establishments.
참고문헌 (26)
- Belton, V., "Remarks on the Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Judgmental Forecasting", International Journal of Forecasting, 12(1), pp.155~161 (1996)
- Dyer, R., "Group Decision Support with the Analytical Hierarchy Process", Decision Support Systems, 8, pp.99~124 (1992)
- Gibbons, J., "Non Parametric Statistical Inference", pp.2010, Chapman and Hill
- Hamalainen, R. P., "A Decision Aid in the Public Debate on Nuclear Power", European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), pp.66~76 (1990)
- Institute for Information and Communication Technology Promotion, "IoT Status and Key Issues", ~ (2014)
- Kim, B., "Machine To Machine Promotion Policy Direction", TTA Journal, (134), pp.34~41 (2011)
- Kim, H., "Machine To Machine", TTA Journal, (134), pp.24~29 (2011)
- Mann, H., "On a Test of Whether One of Two Random Variable is Stochastically Larger Than the Other", Ann. Math. Statist, 18, pp.50~60 (1949)
- Min, K., "Internet of Things, Net Term" (2012), Korea Internet and Security Agency
- Palma-Mendoza, J., "Analytical Hierarchy Process and SCOR Model to Support Supply Chain Re-design", International Journal of Information Management, 34, pp.634~638 (2014)
- Park, K., "The Method of Setting Priorities for Telecommunications Standardization Work Areas-An Analysis of Pilot Test", Korean Management Science Review, 11(3), pp.129~151 (1994)
- Parthasarathy, S., "Determining ERP Customization Choices Using Nominal Group", Technique and Analytical Hierarchy Process, Computers in Industry, 65, pp.1009~1017 (2014)
- Peniwati, K., "Criteria for Evaluating Group Decision-Making Methods", Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46, pp.935~947 (2007)
- Saaty, R. W., "The Analytic Hierarchy Process-What It Is and It Is Used", Mathematical Modelling, 9(3-5), pp.161~176 (1987)
- Satty, T. L., "Pittsburgh" (1982), RWS Publication
- Saaty, T. L., "How To Make a Decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process", European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), pp.9~26 (1990)
- Saaty, T. L., "Relative Measurement and its Generalization in Decision Making : Why Pairwise Comparisons are Central in Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors-The Analytic Hierarchy", Network Process, 2008, pp.102(2), 251~318
- Saaty, T.L., "Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network : Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks" (2005), RWS Publication
- 서준혁, "AHP기법을 활용한 제조물책임 대응시스템 구축요인의 전략적 우선순위 도출에 관한 연구", 품질경영학회지, 42(2), pp.235~252 (2014), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 신영진, "공공분야 개인정보보호 정책 집행과제의 우선순위 분석: 개인정보보호 수준진단 지표의 선정 및 중요도를 중심으로", 정보보호학회논문지, 22(2), pp.379~390 (2012), 한국정보보호학회
- Steenge, A., "The Decentralization of a Sales Support Department in a Medium-Large Company : A Quantitative Assessment Based on Ideas of Thomas L. Saaty and Stafford Beer", European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), pp.120~127 (1990)
- Swapnadeepp, N., "The Internet of Things(IoT Technology Development Trend)", KEIT PD Issue Report, 15(6) (2015)
- Telecommunications Technology Association, "ICT Standardization Strategy Mapp, Ver. 2016", ~ (2016)
- Weiser, M., "The Computer for the Twenty-First Century", Scientific American, 265(3), pp.94~104 (1991)
- 우훈식, "계층분석방법을 이용한 IPv6 멀티네트워킹 표준화항목 우선순위 결정", 산업경영시스템학회지, 34(1), pp.25~32 (2011), 한국산업경영시스템학회
- Xu, Z., "On Consistency of the Weighted Geometric Mean Complex Judgement Matric in AHP", European Journal of Operational Research, 126, pp.683~687 (2000)