본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정부지원 중소기업 컨설팅 사업의 재무적 성과분석 : 기업성장지원센터 사업 기준

Financial Performance Analysis of Government-Supporting Consulting Business to Small and Medium Enterprises : Focused on Corporate Growth Supporting Center in KICOX

2

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산업공학

초록

As the competitiveness of SMEs (small and medium enterprises) is getting more and more improved and globalized, the government provides various consulting services to secure the competitiveness of small and medium firms and support stable growth. However, the assessment of the result from the government’s support is generally focused on non-financial factors, such as customer satisfaction and analysis of improvement effect. This paper is in regards to the statistical analysis of how much the government’s support in the form of providing consulting services contributes to financial outcomes in terms of profitability and growth. ROA (return on asset) and ROS (return on sales), which are investment profitability and sales profitability respectively, are chosen as an indicator of profitability. For analysis of growth, sales revenue and total asset growth are used. The samples are 44 corporations which are supported by government, and 150 corporations which are selected for comparison, with corporate growth support center program by the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy chosen as the consulting model. After gathering the yearly balance sheets and income statements of the samples from CRETOP, Korea Enterprise Data, the analysis is conducted in the way of identifying the statistical significance of financial difference in the same period between corporates taking consulting services and corporates which have not, and the difference of financial outcomes from the corporates taking consulting services before and after consulting services. As a result, in terms of business growth, it is turned out to have positive difference both in growth ratio and profitability compared to the compared corporations at the significant level. Therefore, it is obvious that the consulting program which government provides to SMEs have direct influence practically to the corporates’ management performance.

Abstract

As the competitiveness of SMEs (small and medium enterprises) is getting more and more improved and globalized, the government provides various consulting services to secure the competitiveness of small and medium firms and support stable growth. However, the assessment of the result from the government’s support is generally focused on non-financial factors, such as customer satisfaction and analysis of improvement effect. This paper is in regards to the statistical analysis of how much the government’s support in the form of providing consulting services contributes to financial outcomes in terms of profitability and growth. ROA (return on asset) and ROS (return on sales), which are investment profitability and sales profitability respectively, are chosen as an indicator of profitability. For analysis of growth, sales revenue and total asset growth are used. The samples are 44 corporations which are supported by government, and 150 corporations which are selected for comparison, with corporate growth support center program by the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy chosen as the consulting model. After gathering the yearly balance sheets and income statements of the samples from CRETOP, Korea Enterprise Data, the analysis is conducted in the way of identifying the statistical significance of financial difference in the same period between corporates taking consulting services and corporates which have not, and the difference of financial outcomes from the corporates taking consulting services before and after consulting services. As a result, in terms of business growth, it is turned out to have positive difference both in growth ratio and profitability compared to the compared corporations at the significant level. Therefore, it is obvious that the consulting program which government provides to SMEs have direct influence practically to the corporates’ management performance.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 장현주, "중소기업 R&D 분야에 대한 정부지원의 효과 분석: 기술적, 경제적, 사회적 성과를 중심으로", 한국사회와 행정연구, 26(4), pp.195~218 (2016), 서울행정학회
  2. 장영순, "중소기업 컨설팅서비스의 품질 및 고객만족에 관한 연구", 품질경영학회지, 39(1), pp.24~33 (2011), 한국품질경영학회
  3. Fairfield, P.M., "Accounting Classification and the Predictive Content of Earnings", Accounting Review, 71(3), pp.337~355 (1996)
  4. Greiner, L.E., "Consulting to management" (1983), Prentice-Hall
  5. 김익성, "중소기업 컨설팅이 경영성과에 미치는 영향분석", 한독사회과학논총, 18(1), pp.159~186 (2008), 한독사회과학회
  6. 김정일, "중소기업 컨설팅 수진기업의 정책 만족도에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구", 유통경영학회지, 17(6), pp.81~94 (2014), 한국유통경영학회
  7. Kubr, M., "Management Consulting : A guide to the profession" (2002), International Labour Organization
  8. Lee, A.-S., "A Study on the Relationships Between Competitive Strategies, Business, Innovation, and Performance", The Korean Academic Association of Business Administration, 36, pp.321~343 (2003)
  9. 이후성, "정부 R&D지원 유형에 따른 중소기업 기술적 성과 분석", 기술혁신학회지, 18(1), pp.73~97 (2015), 한국기술혁신학회
  10. 이성환, "2005년 쿠폰제 경영컨설팅 기업의 재무성과", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 11(8), pp.2888~2898 (2010), 한국산학기술학회
  11. Nahavandi, A., "The impact of consulting on small business : a further examination", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(1), pp.29~40 (1988)
  12. 신인화, "AHP를 활용한 경영혁신형중소기업 평가지표 가중치 설정", 산업경영시스템학회지, 30(3), pp.150~157 (2007), 한국산업경영시스템학회
  13. 송거영, "컨설팅 특성 요인이 중소기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향 - 정부지원 컨설팅을 중심으로 -", 디지털융복합연구, 12(7), pp.205~215 (2014), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
  14. 이화득, "기업전략과 미래수익성에 관한 연구", 회계저널, 19(5), pp.67~88 (2010), 한국회계학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)