본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

산촌생태마을 유형별 주민 보완 요구 및 기대 효과 분석

An Analysis of Residents’ Supplementation Demand and Expected Effect by Types of Mountain Village Development Project

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

This study aimed to categorize mountain villages according to business expense investments and investigate residents’ supplementation demands and differences between expected effects by the categories. For the study, 35 villages where are completely developed on and after 2007 were selected to consider fairness among local governments. Each village leader(the head of the village or the chairperson of the management committee) was conducted a survey from 2012 May to August and one copy of survey was eliminated from the study. The study is summarized into four results. First, the types of mountain villages were categorized as a type of mountain village practice(18), a type of life environment improvement(8) and a type of forestry income(8) according by the itemized reports of the business expense investments. Second, the result of F-test(One Way ANOVA) for the average analysis by types showed that 3 out of 6 demands for the operation were significant differences and a supplementation necessity of the program was identified significant differences in p<0.01 level. The necessity of forestry resources use and sprawling development prevention are also showed significant differences among types in p<0.05 level. Third, F-test results from 7 questions of desired effects through mountain village creation project revealed that promotion and market security of forestry products and local patriotism instillation through a personal exchange are significant differences between types in p<0.05 level. Forth, the results of duplication benefits(the mountain village development projects and the village support programs with other departments) on the residents’ development expectation found that when a village received a large number of projects, residents’ expected effects were higher than other village residents where received relatively a small number of projects. However, the expected effects from the increasing quantities of projects were decreased.

Abstract

This study aimed to categorize mountain villages according to business expense investments and investigate residents’ supplementation demands and differences between expected effects by the categories. For the study, 35 villages where are completely developed on and after 2007 were selected to consider fairness among local governments. Each village leader(the head of the village or the chairperson of the management committee) was conducted a survey from 2012 May to August and one copy of survey was eliminated from the study. The study is summarized into four results. First, the types of mountain villages were categorized as a type of mountain village practice(18), a type of life environment improvement(8) and a type of forestry income(8) according by the itemized reports of the business expense investments. Second, the result of F-test(One Way ANOVA) for the average analysis by types showed that 3 out of 6 demands for the operation were significant differences and a supplementation necessity of the program was identified significant differences in p<0.01 level. The necessity of forestry resources use and sprawling development prevention are also showed significant differences among types in p<0.05 level. Third, F-test results from 7 questions of desired effects through mountain village creation project revealed that promotion and market security of forestry products and local patriotism instillation through a personal exchange are significant differences between types in p<0.05 level. Forth, the results of duplication benefits(the mountain village development projects and the village support programs with other departments) on the residents’ development expectation found that when a village received a large number of projects, residents’ expected effects were higher than other village residents where received relatively a small number of projects. However, the expected effects from the increasing quantities of projects were decreased.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. 곽경호, "산촌생태마을 운영프로그램 실태분석", 한국산림휴양학회지, 15(2), pp.77~84 (2011), 한국산림휴양복지학회
  2. 김의경, "산촌지역 구분지표 설정에 관한 연구", 한국임학회지, 84(3), pp.343~355 (1995)
  3. 우리나라의 산촌지역 구분 조사, "김종호", 임업연구원, ~ (1997)
  4. 김종호, "산촌개발의 중요도에 의한 산촌마을 구분 및 산촌개발대상지역 우선순위 조사", 산림과학논문집, 58, pp.61~71 (1998)
  5. 김종호, "한국의 산촌지역 구분과 그의 특성에 관한 연구", 산림휴양연구, 3(3), pp.91~101 (1999)
  6. 산촌개발사업 평가 및 주민만족도 조사, "산림청", ~ (2006)
  7. 산림청, "산촌생태마을 실태조사 및 개선방안 연구", ~ (2010)
  8. 지역개발 촉진을 위한 산촌진흥계획 방향 정립, "서정원", 국립 산림과학원, ~ (2006)
  9. 신용호, "산촌개발사업 조성이후의 마을시설현황에 따른 주민만족도평가에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2006
  10. 전국 산촌 기초조사 보고서, "유병일", 임업연구원, ~ (2003)
  11. 산촌체험관광 발전방안, "전준헌", 국립산림과학원, ~ (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)