본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

품질경쟁력 우수기업 평가지표의 확인적 요인분석

A Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Quality Competitiveness Excellence Company Evaluation Indicators

윤민|박동준|윤예분
한국산업경영시스템학회 (KOREAN SOCIETY OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING)|2020.09|한국산업경영시스템학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering)|제43권 제3호|pp. 101-111|DOI 10.11627/jkise.2020.43.3.101

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Confirmatory Factor AnalysisBusiness ExcellenceQuality Competitive Excellent ModelQuality Award
주제분류산업공학

초록

Companies struggle to make their best products with high quality and service at a competitive price in global markets. However, customer needs and requirements keep changing with a variety of situations. Companies that face the changes can not stay the same and make an effort to adapt themselves to new circumstances. They would probably review the overall management system that is currently implementing to improve management efficiency. Among other things, quality might be considered to be a crucial element if they are manufacturing industries to be sustained in global markets. KSA (Korean Standards Association) is a government-affiliated organization under the Ministry of Trade, Infrastructure, and Energy. It is a Korean standards provider for quality and service industry. KSA confers national commendations for organizations, quality circles, artisans, QCEC (Quality Competitive Excellent Company), and the most honorable KNQA (Korean National Quality Award) every year. KSA established KNQA on the basis of Malcom Baldrige National Quality Award, Deming Prize, and European Quality Award. Research on quality awards shows that there are many similarities in the framework. Although KSA summarizes two factors for 13 evaluation indicators in the quality competitive excellent model of QCEC, the categorization is ambiguous to explain them according to earlier studies. We performed a deep analysis of foreign quality awards and background for KNQA and QCEC. We conducted a content analysis of KNQA and QCEC and matched evaluation items that were closely related. We proposed a quality competitiveness model with three factors, Technology, System, and Tools, summarizing 13 evaluation indicators in QCEC. Based on audit data for six years from 2012 to 2017 we carried out a confirmatory factor analysis for the proposed model by examining the model validity and fitness. Received 26 August 2020; Finally Revised 19 September 2020; Accepted 24 September 2020 †Corresponding Author : myoon@pknu.ac.kr

Abstract

Companies struggle to make their best products with high quality and service at a competitive price in global markets. However, customer needs and requirements keep changing with a variety of situations. Companies that face the changes can not stay the same and make an effort to adapt themselves to new circumstances. They would probably review the overall management system that is currently implementing to improve management efficiency. Among other things, quality might be considered to be a crucial element if they are manufacturing industries to be sustained in global markets. KSA (Korean Standards Association) is a government-affiliated organization under the Ministry of Trade, Infrastructure, and Energy. It is a Korean standards provider for quality and service industry. KSA confers national commendations for organizations, quality circles, artisans, QCEC (Quality Competitive Excellent Company), and the most honorable KNQA (Korean National Quality Award) every year. KSA established KNQA on the basis of Malcom Baldrige National Quality Award, Deming Prize, and European Quality Award. Research on quality awards shows that there are many similarities in the framework. Although KSA summarizes two factors for 13 evaluation indicators in the quality competitive excellent model of QCEC, the categorization is ambiguous to explain them according to earlier studies. We performed a deep analysis of foreign quality awards and background for KNQA and QCEC. We conducted a content analysis of KNQA and QCEC and matched evaluation items that were closely related. We proposed a quality competitiveness model with three factors, Technology, System, and Tools, summarizing 13 evaluation indicators in QCEC. Based on audit data for six years from 2012 to 2017 we carried out a confirmatory factor analysis for the proposed model by examining the model validity and fitness. Received 26 August 2020; Finally Revised 19 September 2020; Accepted 24 September 2020 †Corresponding Author : myoon@pknu.ac.kr

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Ambastha, A., "Competitiveness of firms : review of theory, framework, and models", Singapore Management Review, 26(1), pp.45~61 (2004)
  2. "American Society for Quality Control"[URL]
  3. Brwon, T.A., "Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research" (2006), The Guilford Press
  4. Defeo, J.A., "Juran’s Quality Handbook :The Complete Guide to Performance Excellence" (2010), McGraw Hill
  5. Diaz-Chao, A., "The competitiveness of small network-firm : a practical tool", Journal of Business Research, 69(5), pp.1769~1774 (2016)
  6. Flynn, B. B., "The impact of quality management practices on performance and competitive advantage", Decision Sciences, 26(5), pp.659~691 (1995)
  7. Ghobadian, A., "Characteristics, benefits, and shortcomings of four major quality awards", International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 13(2), pp.10~44 (1996)
  8. Hair, J. F., "Mutivariate Data Analysis" (1998), Cengage
  9. Hu, L., "Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification", Psychological Methods, 3(4), pp.424~453 (1998)
  10. "IBM SPSS Analysis of Moment Structure Version 22"[URL]
  11. The World Competitiveness Report, "Institute of Management Development and World Economic Forum", ~ (1993)
  12. Karimi, A., "A study of the baldrige award framework using the applicant scoring data", Total Quality Management, 25(5), pp.461~477 (2014)
  13. 김호균, "ISO 9001:2015 인증을 위한 리스크 기반 사고의 개념과 리스크 관리", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 40(3), pp.38~48 (2017), 한국산업경영시스템학회
  14. 김호균, "ISO 9001:2015 개정규격 전환에 따른 제조업체의 대응 방안", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 39(3), pp.71~82 (2016), 한국산업경영시스템학회
  15. "Korean National Quality Award"[URL]
  16. "Korean National Quality Award"[URL]
  17. "Korean Standards Association"[URL]
  18. Kumar, A., "A Quality competitiveness index for benchmarking", Benchmarking : An International Journal, 6(1), pp.12~21 (1999)
  19. Lau, R. S. M., "Assessing quality management in china MBNQA criteria", International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 21(7), pp.699~713 (2004)
  20. 이형석, "“품질경쟁력 우수기업”수상기업의 재무성과에 관한 연구: 연도의 조절효과를 중심으로", 품질경영학회지, 44(3), pp.617~638 (2016), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
  21. 이현수, "해외 경영우수모델의 역사적 고찰에 관한 연구", 경영사연구, 31(1), pp.27~50 (2016), 한국경영사학회[DOI]
  22. Loehlin, J. C., "Latent Variable Models, An Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural Analysis" (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
  23. Man, T. W. Y., "The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises : a conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies", Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), pp.123~142 (2002)
  24. Marsh, H. W., "Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis : the effect of sample size", Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), pp.391~410 (1988)
  25. Miguel, P. A. C., "Receiving a national quality award three times-recognition of excellence in quality and performance", The TQM Journal, 27(1), pp.63~78 (2015)
  26. Moon, J. Y., "A study on the causal relationships in the korean national quality award model", Total Quality Management, 22(7), pp.705~726 (2011)
  27. "Baldrige Performance Excellence Program"[URL]
  28. 박동준, "품질경쟁력 우수기업의 평가지표에 대한 실증적 분석", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 39(1), pp.37~46 (2016), 한국산업경영시스템학회
  29. Park, D. J., "Business values of ISO 9000:2000 to korean shipbuilding machinery manufacturing enterprises", International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 24(1), pp.32~48 (2007)
  30. Park, D.J., "Relationship analysis for evaluation indicators of quality competitiveness model", Proceeding of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, pp.65~74 (2019)
  31. 박동준, "ISO 9001:2015 전환심사의 실증적 분석", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 41(4), pp.70~80 (2018), 한국산업경영시스템학회[DOI]
  32. 박동준, "품질경쟁력 우수기업의 특성분석", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 42(3), pp.95~108 (2019), 한국산업경영시스템학회[DOI]
  33. Park, S., "Quality management practices and their relationship to buyer’s supplier ratings : a study in the korean automotive industry", Journal of Operations Management, 19(6), pp.695~712 (2001)
  34. "Quality Competitiveness Assessment System"[URL]
  35. Rajashekharaiah, J., "Quality leaders-learning from the deming prize winners in india", International Journal for Quality Research, 8(3), pp.431~446 (2014)
  36. Ramlawati, R., "Total quality management as the key of the company to gain the competitiveness, performance achievement, and consumer satisfaction", International Review of Management and Marketing, 8(5), pp.60~69 (2018)
  37. Shurchuluu, P., "National productivity and competitive strategies for the new millennium", Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 13(6), pp.408~414 (2002)
  38. "Deming Prize"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

품질경쟁력 우수기업의 평가지표에 대한 실증적 분석박동준한국산업경영시스템학회 · 한국산업경영시스템학회지2016 · 제39권 제1호품질경쟁력 우수기업의 특성분석윤민, 강인선, 김호균, 박동준, 유은재, 윤예분한국산업경영시스템학회 · 한국산업경영시스템학회지2019 · 제42권 제3호한국형 모델 개발을 위한 국가품질상 국제 비교 연구김연성, 김태규한국품질경영학회 · 품질경영학회지2011 · 제39권 제2호한국 국가품질상 개선방안에 관한 연구: 아시아 국가들과의 비교를 중심으로이관석, 정규석한국품질경영학회 · 품질경영학회지2010 · 제38권 제2호품질경영 활동이 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향: 국가품질상 수상 제조기업을 중심으로정규석, 한상훈, 홍승표한국품질경영학회 · 품질경영학회지2014 · 제42권 제4호국가품질상 모델을 적용한 ICT산업의 인과 관계 분석 연구신동근, 황찬규(사)디지털산업정보학회 · (사)디지털산업정보학회 논문지2018 · 제14권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)

미국 금리 스프레드를 이용한 한국 금리 스프레드 예측 모델에 관한 연구 : SVR-앙상블(RNN, LSTM, GRU) 모델 기반정순호, 송명진, 정윤재, 고성석, 김영후pp. 1-9색도 및 색순에 따른 그라비아 인쇄 공정의 작업 순서 결정 규칙배재호pp. 10-20후속시장이 가격결정에 미치는 영향 분석이민호, 조형래pp. 21-28산업구조와 가치사슬이 신흥국 진출 성공에 미치는 영향오재호, 박광호pp. 29-40수치실험을 통한 스트레스 감소 예방보수모형의 고찰박종훈pp. 41-52
원문 보기