게스케(Geske) 모델을 이용한 신재생에너지사업의 경제성 분석
The Economic Evaluation of the Renewable Energy Projects using the Geske Model
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As the environmental impacts of fossil fuel energy sources increase, the South Korean government has tried to change non-envi- ronmental-friendly enery sources to environmental-friendly energy sources in order to mitigate environmental effects, which lead to global warming and air pollution. With both a limited budget and limited time, it is essential to accurately evaluate the economic and environmental effects of renewable energy projects for the efficient and effective operation of renewable energy plants. Although the traditional economic evaluation methods are not ideal for evaluating the economic impacts of renewable energy projects, they can still be used for this purpose. Renewable energy projects involve many risks due to various uncertainties. For this reason, this study utilizes a real option method, the Geske compound model, to evaluate the renewable energy projects on Jeju Island in terms of economic and environmental values. This study has developed an economic evaluation model based on the Geske compound model to investigate the influences of flexibility and uncertainty factors on the evaluation process. This study further conducts a sensitivity analysis to examine how two uncertainty factors (namely, investment cost and wind energy production) influence the economic and environmental value of renewable energy projects.
Abstract
As the environmental impacts of fossil fuel energy sources increase, the South Korean government has tried to change non-envi- ronmental-friendly enery sources to environmental-friendly energy sources in order to mitigate environmental effects, which lead to global warming and air pollution. With both a limited budget and limited time, it is essential to accurately evaluate the economic and environmental effects of renewable energy projects for the efficient and effective operation of renewable energy plants. Although the traditional economic evaluation methods are not ideal for evaluating the economic impacts of renewable energy projects, they can still be used for this purpose. Renewable energy projects involve many risks due to various uncertainties. For this reason, this study utilizes a real option method, the Geske compound model, to evaluate the renewable energy projects on Jeju Island in terms of economic and environmental values. This study has developed an economic evaluation model based on the Geske compound model to investigate the influences of flexibility and uncertainty factors on the evaluation process. This study further conducts a sensitivity analysis to examine how two uncertainty factors (namely, investment cost and wind energy production) influence the economic and environmental value of renewable energy projects.
참고문헌 (24)
- Abadie L. M, "Valuation of Wind Energy Projects : A Real Option Approach", Energies, 7(5), pp.3218~3255 (2014)
- Bae, J, "A Study on the Ecomomic and Envriormental Effects of Renewable Energy Policy in Jeju Island" (2015), Bank of Korea
- Barroso, M. M, "A Valuation of Wind Power Projects in Germany Using Real Regulatory Options", Energy, 77, pp.422~433 (2014)
- Boomsma, T. K, "Renewable Energy Investments Under Different Support Schemes : A Real Options Approach", European Journal of Operational Research, 220, pp.225~237 (2012)
- Bøckman, T, "Investment Timing and Optimal Capacity Choice for Small Hydropower Projects", European Journal of Operations Research, 190(1), pp.255~267 (2008)
- Deter, N, "Real Options Approach to Renewable Energy Investments in Mongolia", Eenrgy Policy, 56, pp.136~150 (2013)
- Jeon, C, "Optimal Subsidy Estimation Method Using System Dynamics and the Real Option Model : Photovoltaic Technology Case", Applied Energy, 142, pp.33~43 (2015)
- Kim, B, "Determining the Optimal Installation Timing of Building Integrated Photovoltaic Systems", Journal of Cleaner Production, 140(3), pp.1322~1329 (2017)
- 김은만, "실물옵션을 활용한 RPS 실시에 따른 태양광 발전의 경제성 평가: 공급의무 발전사와 일반 발전사와의 비교", 전기전자재료학회논문지, 26(9), pp.690~700 (2013), 한국전기전자재료학회[DOI]
- 김경석, "실물옵션 기법을 활용한 신재생에너지사업 경제성분석에 관한 연구", 한국건설관리학회 논문집, 18(2), pp.91~98 (2017), 한국건설관리학회[DOI]
- Kim, K, "Evaluation of R&D Investments in Wind Power in Korea using Real Option", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 40, pp.335~347 (2014)
- 김영경, "발전량, 가격, 장기금리 변동성을기초로 한 풍력발전사업의 실물옵션 가치평가", 신재생에너지, 10(1), pp.41~49 (2014), 한국신·재생에너지학회
- Kjæland, F, "A Real Option Analysis of Investments in Hydropower : The Case of Norway", Energy Policy, 35, pp.5901~5908 (2007)
- 곽은섭, "재생에너지원 보급에 따른 전력계통 안정도 분석", 한국전자통신학회 논문지, 16(4), pp.633~642 (2021), 한국전자통신학회
- Lee, S, "Using Real Option Analysis for Highly Uncertain Technology Investments : The Case of Wind Energy Technology", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, pp.4443~4450 (2011)
- Lee, S, "Rnewable Energy Policy Evaluation Using Real Option Model : The Case of Taiwan", Energy Economics, 32, pp.567~578 (2010)
- Loncar, D, "Compound Real Options Valuation of Renewable Energy Projects: The Case of a Wind Farm in Serbia", Renewable and Sustainable, Energy Reviews, 75, pp.354~367 (2017)
- Martinez-Cesena, E. A, "Assessment of Domestic Photovoltaic Systems Based on Real Options Theory", Progress in Photovoltaics : Research and Applications, 21, pp.250~262 (2013)
- Martinez-Cesena, E. A, "Wind Power Projects Planning Considering Real Options for the Wind Reseource Assessment", IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 3(1), pp.158~166 (2012)
- Reuter, W. H, "Renewable Energy Investment : Policy and Market Impacts", Applied Energy, 97, pp.249~254 (2012)
- Schneider, M, "Making Real Options Work for Practitioners : A Generic Model for Valuing R&D Projects", R&D Management, 38(1), pp.85~106 (2008)
- 심재훈, "옵션민감도를 고려한 기술자금의 경제적 가치와 실패확률", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 44(1), pp.1~8 (2021), 한국산업경영시스템학회
- Ventsanos, K, "Renewable Energy Sources Project Appraisal Under Uncertainty : The Case of Wind Energy Explotion within a Changing Energy Market Environment", Energy Policy, 30(4), pp.293~307 (2002)
- Zhang, M. M, "A Real Options Model for Renewable Energy Investment with Application to Solar Photovoltaic Power Generation in China", Energy Economics, 59, pp.213~226 (2016)