기업체 인적자원개발 담당자의 핵심직무역량모델 개발
Developing a Core Competency Model for Human Resource Development Practitioners in Corporate
0
조회
0
다운로드
82
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to develop a Core Competency Model for HRD practitioners in corporations. The process of this study was as follows: ① Identifying HRD practitioners' work outputs, ② Selecting HRD practitioners' key work outputs, ③ Identifying HRD practitioners' activity that can lead HRD practitioners' key work outputs, ④ Identifying knowledge, skill and attitude that have a relation to HRD practitioners' activity, ⑤ Grouping similar knowledge, skills, and attitudes, and naming and defining competencies. The major findings of this study were as follows: ① Twelve job domains and 80 work outputs from HRD practitioners were found, which were different from the results of McLagan(1989)'s work(11 job domains and 76 work outputs). ② As the result of selecting HRD practitioners' key work outputs, 37 key work outputs(10 job domains) were perceived to be critical. ③ 211 activities of 37 key work outputs were found. Some key work outputs were composed of similar activities. ④ Knowledge, skill, and attitude that are in relation to HRD practitioners' activity were identified. ⑤ Finally, 22 competencies were identified. Based on the findings of the study, the major conclusions of this study were as follows: ① Internal consulting was newly identified in the HRD practitioners' job domain. This revealed that the HRD practitioners' job domain was expanded to the part to include the present intervention program that is suitable through organizational diagnosis. ② Outputs connected with Program design, evaluation, internal consulting, and organizational change were perceived to be critical by HRD practitioners. This showed that HRD was achieved to focus on training and development and organizational development in corporations. On the other hand, outputs connected with career development were perceived to be not so important in present, but highly important in future by HRD practitioners. ③ Core competencies for HRD practitioners were different from those of McLagan(1989)'s work.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a Core Competency Model for HRD practitioners in corporations. The process of this study was as follows: ① Identifying HRD practitioners' work outputs, ② Selecting HRD practitioners' key work outputs, ③ Identifying HRD practitioners' activity that can lead HRD practitioners' key work outputs, ④ Identifying knowledge, skill and attitude that have a relation to HRD practitioners' activity, ⑤ Grouping similar knowledge, skills, and attitudes, and naming and defining competencies. The major findings of this study were as follows: ① Twelve job domains and 80 work outputs from HRD practitioners were found, which were different from the results of McLagan(1989)'s work(11 job domains and 76 work outputs). ② As the result of selecting HRD practitioners' key work outputs, 37 key work outputs(10 job domains) were perceived to be critical. ③ 211 activities of 37 key work outputs were found. Some key work outputs were composed of similar activities. ④ Knowledge, skill, and attitude that are in relation to HRD practitioners' activity were identified. ⑤ Finally, 22 competencies were identified. Based on the findings of the study, the major conclusions of this study were as follows: ① Internal consulting was newly identified in the HRD practitioners' job domain. This revealed that the HRD practitioners' job domain was expanded to the part to include the present intervention program that is suitable through organizational diagnosis. ② Outputs connected with Program design, evaluation, internal consulting, and organizational change were perceived to be critical by HRD practitioners. This showed that HRD was achieved to focus on training and development and organizational development in corporations. On the other hand, outputs connected with career development were perceived to be not so important in present, but highly important in future by HRD practitioners. ③ Core competencies for HRD practitioners were different from those of McLagan(1989)'s work.
참고문헌 (50)
- 강경종, "능력중심교육과정에 기초한 교육과정 개발", 29(1), pp.145~160 (1997)
- "기업내 교육훈련 담당자의 역할 직업교육연구", pp.63~73 (1985)
- 김영길, "구조조정기 HRD담당자의 역할 변화에 관한 연구" (1999)
- 김진모, "인적자원개발을 위한 직무역량 규명 학습지 기업을 대상으로", 8(2), pp.159~177 (2001)
- "기업의 인적자원 개발을 위한 역량 중심의 교육과정 개발", 20(2), pp.109~128 (2001), 직업교육연구
- 김종훈, "학습조직과 HRD 담당자의 역할", 6, pp.65~89 (1999)
- 김현수, "인적자원개발 담당자의 직무능력과 역할수행에 관한 연구" (1999)
- 김현주, "역량기반 인적자원관리(CBHRM)의 도입과 발전: 한국 기업을 위한 상황론적 접근법", 3(1), pp.120~158 (2003)
- 김희진, "국내 기업에 있어서 HRD 담당자의 Learning Technology 역량연구" (1999)
- 변호승, "교수공학자의 수행역량분석", 17(1), pp.57~79 (2001)
- 유영만, "죽은 기업교육 살아있는 디지털 학습" (2000), 한국언론자료간행회
- 유영만, "한국 기업교육의 경쟁력 강화 방안 딜레마 탈출을 위한 한 시도" (1998), 엘테크
- 윤여순, "IMF 체제에 대응하는 기업교육의 구조적 변화와 담당자의 역할의 변화", (104) (1999)
- "HRD담당자의 자질에 관한 연구 HRD부서의 운영체제를 중심으로" (1994)
- 이관응, "구조조정이후 한국 기업교육의 재창조" (1998), 엘테크
- 이동배, "업무성과 향상의 비결 컴피턴시" (2000), 이디에스컨설팅
- 이주인, "컴피턴시 인사모델", (11월) (2000)
- 정용진, "세계화 시대에 대응하는 인적자원개발전문가의 역할과 역량", 9(1), pp.327~374 (2003)
- 장정훈, "조직문화 변화를 위한 수행공학 실천가의 역할 및 역량 정의에 대한 델파이 연구" (1999)
- 정재삼, "수행공학자의 기본능력과 자질", (86), pp.64~69 (1997)
- 정재창,, "알기 쉬운 역량 모델링" (2001), PSI 컨설팅
- 주용국, "기업 내 인적자원개발 담당자 역할 강화방안" (2003), 한국직업능력개발원
- PSI컨설팅(편)., "핵심역량 모델의 개발과 활용" (1998), PSI 컨설팅
- Bernthal. P. R. et al., "2004 ASTD Competency Model: Mapping the future" (2004), ASTD Press
- A, "A Model for Effective Performance" (1982)
- Dubois, "A Strategy for Organizational Change" (1993), HRD press Inc
- Gilley, "Principles of Human Resource Development" (1989)
- Gilley, "Principles of Human Resource Development" (2002)
- Gilley, "Organizational Learning, Performance, and Change." (2000)
- Jacobs, "Systems theory applied to human resource development Systems theory applied to human resource development", pp.27~60 (1989), ASTD Press
- Lucia, "The Art and Science of Competency Models" (1999), Jossey-Bass[DOI]
- & James, "Journal of Marketing", 41(1), pp.13~17 (1997)
- McClelland, "Testing for competence rather than for intelligence", pp.1~14 (1973)
- McLagan, "Models for Excellence The Conclusions and Recommendation of the ASTD Training and Development Competency Study" (1983)
- McLagan, "Models for HRD practice" (1989)
- McLagan, "Great ideas revisited", 50(1), pp.60~65 (1996)
- McLagan, "Model for HRD practice" (1997)
- McLagan, "Competencies", 51(5), pp.40~47 (1997)
- Mirabile, "Everything you wanted to know about competency modeling", 51(8), pp.73~77 (1997)
- Nadler, "The handbook of human resource development" (1984)
- O'Brien, "The development of Irish HRD professionals in comparison with European professionals International Journal of Training and Development", 3(4), pp.250~268 (1999)
- Parker, "A specification for the training of trainers" (1982)
- Parry, "The quest for competencies", 33(7), pp.48~56 (1996)
- Sanders, "ASTD Model for Learning Technologies" (1998)
- Rothwell, "modeling and assessment in the USA", 3(2), pp.90~105 (1999)
- People Management, "Too Good to be True", pp.22~27 (1996)
- John Wiley, "Competence at Work Models for Superior Performance" (1993), Inc
- & Swanson, "The strategic roles of human resource development", 18(4), pp.10~21 (1995)
- Valkeavaara, T, "Human resource development roles and competencies in five European countries International Journal of Training and Development", 2(3)(99), pp.171~189 (1998), Valkeavaara
- White, "The concept of competence", pp.279~333 (1959)