본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지역대학생의 농촌경관 개선사업 참여를 위한 발전방안 연구- 금산읍 농촌중심지 사업을 대상으로 -

A Study on Development Plans to Engage Local University Students in Landscape Improvement Projects in Rural Areas- The case of on the Revitalization Project of Rural Center of Geumsan-eup -

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

This study aims to identify more reasonable and efficient development plans to engage local university students in landscape improvement projects in rural areas. To survey university students, residents, administrators and experts involved in such projects on important considerations in this regard, SWOT analysis was employed to identify important factors, followed by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to evaluate their relative importance, identify problems and suggest implications for improvement. The results are summarized as follows: the relative importance of the SWOT group was in the order of opportunity, strength, threat, and weakness. For each SWOT factor, the relative importance of strengths was in the order of students’ aspiration and passion, availability of creative ideas and designs, and improved attachment to their community. The relative importance of weaknesses was in the order of the lack of spontaneous participation of residents, short preparation periods and insufficient budgets, and the lack of experience in similar projects. The relative importance of opportunities was in the order of young students’ activity itself being a boost factor to the community, students’ endeavors arising a consensus among residents, and students feeling a sense of duty as representatives of their school. The relative importance of threats was in the order of projects being one-shot, temporary events, immaturity, and differences in preferences between older and younger generations. To draw an overall ranking of the sub-factors evaluated, the overall relative importance of the decision-making factors was evaluated. Among the sub-factors for each SWOT group, young students’ activity itself being a boost factor to the community as an opportunity factor was shown to be the most important, while the lack of experience in similar projects was shown to be the least important as administrators and experts made appropriate interventions in each stage.

Abstract

This study aims to identify more reasonable and efficient development plans to engage local university students in landscape improvement projects in rural areas. To survey university students, residents, administrators and experts involved in such projects on important considerations in this regard, SWOT analysis was employed to identify important factors, followed by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to evaluate their relative importance, identify problems and suggest implications for improvement. The results are summarized as follows: the relative importance of the SWOT group was in the order of opportunity, strength, threat, and weakness. For each SWOT factor, the relative importance of strengths was in the order of students’ aspiration and passion, availability of creative ideas and designs, and improved attachment to their community. The relative importance of weaknesses was in the order of the lack of spontaneous participation of residents, short preparation periods and insufficient budgets, and the lack of experience in similar projects. The relative importance of opportunities was in the order of young students’ activity itself being a boost factor to the community, students’ endeavors arising a consensus among residents, and students feeling a sense of duty as representatives of their school. The relative importance of threats was in the order of projects being one-shot, temporary events, immaturity, and differences in preferences between older and younger generations. To draw an overall ranking of the sub-factors evaluated, the overall relative importance of the decision-making factors was evaluated. Among the sub-factors for each SWOT group, young students’ activity itself being a boost factor to the community as an opportunity factor was shown to be the most important, while the lack of experience in similar projects was shown to be the least important as administrators and experts made appropriate interventions in each stage.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 안영진, "경관관리의 실효성 확보를 위한 법적 개선방안", 공법학연구, 14(1), pp.303~324 (2013), 한국비교공법학회[DOI]
  2. Chungnam Development Institute, "Analysis of Performance and future strategies for the development and maintenance of rural centers" (2014)
  3. 동재욱, "도시경관 중심의 주민참여 마을 만들기 방안에 관한 연구 - 일본, 영국, 미국의 사례를 중심으로 -", 한국디지털건축인테리어학회 논문집, 9(2), pp.45~56 (2009), 한국디지털건축·인테리어학회
  4. 황바람, "농촌 공동체 협업활동의 사회연결망분석 - 충남 홍성군 홍동 지역을 중심으로 -", 농촌계획, 23(2), pp.9~17 (2017), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  5. 주신하, "농촌경관의 보전‧형성‧관리를 위한 정책제안 연구", 농촌계획, 14(4), pp.77~86 (2008), 한국농촌계획학회
  6. 김은정, "읍·면 소재지 종합정비사업 평가지표 체계의 개선방안 -기존 소도읍 육성 사업의 평가지표 체계 분석을 바탕으로-", 한국농촌건축학회논문집, 14(1), pp.45~56 (2012), 한국농촌건축학회
  7. 김은영, "농촌현장포럼을 적용한 마을발전계획 수립 방안- 충주시 봉황권역 사례 -", 농촌계획, 20(4), pp.209~220 (2014), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  8. 김태구, "농촌마을종합개발사업의 협력적 계획과정과 계획효과의 영향구조 분석", 농촌계획, 20(2), pp.23~43 (2014), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  9. 김용진, "IPA를 활용한 농촌중심지 활성화 사업에 대한 거주민 인식 - 장수군 장계면을 중심으로 -", 농촌계획, 23(3), pp.133~145 (2017), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  10. Kim, Y. U., "Regional development theory" (2003), Hanul Academy
  11. 이정훈, "연성(軟性) 지역개발의 주요 수단으로서 장소브랜딩에 관한 이론적 고찰과 과제", 대한지리학회지, 43(6), pp.873~893 (2008), 대한지리학회
  12. 이재준, "지속가능한 농촌발전을 위한 주민참여 요인분석에 관한 연구", 국토계획, 38(3), pp.39~55 (2003), 대한국토·도시계획학회
  13. Lee, J, W., "Study on Activating Plans for Community Participation in Rural Landscape Planning and Management", pp.2013
  14. Lee, Y. J., "A Study on the Improvement of General Rural Area Development Project for Effective Rural Landscape Management", Journal of the Korea Landscape Council, 7(2), pp.90~104 (2015)
  15. 이유직, "농촌경관관리 개선을 위한 주체 간 인식비교", 한국농촌건축학회논문집, 17(4), pp.41~48 (2015), 한국농촌건축학회
  16. 이유직, "일본 농촌지역 경관관리 현황과 시사점 - 시가현 오미하치만시를 대상으로 -", 농촌계획, 22(4), pp.81~92 (2016), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  17. 이원주, "단계별 주민역량강화를 통한 농촌마을만들기의 효과 연구- 전라북도 진안군을 대상으로 -", 농촌계획, 19(4), pp.269~281 (2013), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  18. 오형은, "농촌 중심지 활성화사업의 주민참여 촉진 방안에 관한 연구 - 나가노현 오부세정을 사례로 -", 농촌계획, 21(3), pp.47~58 (2015), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  19. 오형은, "주민참여를 통한 농촌중심지 활성화 방안 연구 - 정읍시 내장상동을 중심으로 -", 한국조경학회지, 43(5), pp.121~131 (2015), 한국조경학회
  20. Park, B. S., "The Role of the College in Community Development", Korean public administration and policy review, 6(1), pp.103~121 (2008)
  21. 박준규, "일반농산어촌개발사업이 농촌 지역주민 삶의 질에 미치는 영향", 농촌계획, 23(4), pp.75~90 (2017), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  22. 박진현, "농어촌경관 관리정책에 대한 관련 주체의 의식분석 및 향후 과제", 농촌계획, 18(3), pp.123~135 (2012), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  23. 박지훈, "농촌경관정책의 실효성을 위한 평가요소 도출", 농촌계획, 22(3), pp.81~96 (2016), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  24. 박진욱, "지역 주민 주체의 농촌지역 경관관리 사례 연구 - 일본 오사카부를 중심으로 -", 농촌계획, 23(1), pp.165~174 (2017), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  25. Park, S. H., "Monitoring of Comprehensive Rural Village Development Projects" (2004)
  26. Park, Y. H., "University and Regional Development : Reviews and Prospects", Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 36(4), pp.418~433 (2001)
  27. 리신호, "권역단위 농촌지역개발사업의 주민역량 측정을 위한 설문도구개발", 농촌계획, 20(4), pp.165~182 (2014), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  28. Song, M. R., "Evaluation of Rural Village Development Programs and Suggestions for Participatory Village Development Model" (2004)
  29. 송미령, "농촌경관 보전을 위한 정책 동향과 시사점", 농촌경제, 28(3), pp.121~137 (2005), 한국농촌경제연구원
  30. 송미령, "주민자율적 마을 가꾸기 현황과 성과 분석", 국토계획, 37(1), pp.169~179 (2002), 대한국토·도시계획학회
  31. Sung, J. I., "A Study on Rural Landscape Management and Policy Directions" (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)