농촌경관정책의 실효성을 위한 평가요소 도출
Evaluation Elements for Effectiveness of Rural Landscape Policy
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
For rural landscape management to run in virtuous circle, the present study has paid attention to the roles and activities of local residents and administration, which are the main sectors of managing landscape. In this respect, this study is aimed to arrange the roles of local residents and administration for landscape management and propose the basic data necessary to develope evaluation index for effectiveness of rural landscape policy. Key findings and implications are as follows. First, literature reviews of 18 landscape management studies found 37 administrative roles and 7 roles of local residents. And those roles were classified into 3 factors by similar concept: 'local government support system', 'landscape management planning', and 'promoting the participation of residents'. Second, two Delphi surveys were conducted with landscape experts to verify the validity of those evaluation items by sector. Third, factor analysis was carried out to analyze the hierarchical structure of those evaluation items. 3 sub-factors were extracted from 'local government support system' sector; 2 sub-factors from the 'landscape management planning' sector; and 4 sub-factors from the 'promoting participation of residents' sector. Fourth, the hierarchy of those evaluation factors was divided into high and low classes and sub-indexes were structured to examine the relative importance of each class and assign a relative weight on each index. The most important sub-factors were turned out as follows: 'local residents' will to practice landscape activities (0.112)', 'local government budget for rural landscape management (0.088), and 'restriction on buildings by village regulation (0.068). It indicates the viewpoints of the landscape experts that local residents' voluntary participation in landscape activities and agreement of local residents on landscape management by village, e.g. village regulation, are preconditions for successful landscape management. In addition, it is significant for a local government to secure the budget of landscape management to support local residents support.
Abstract
For rural landscape management to run in virtuous circle, the present study has paid attention to the roles and activities of local residents and administration, which are the main sectors of managing landscape. In this respect, this study is aimed to arrange the roles of local residents and administration for landscape management and propose the basic data necessary to develope evaluation index for effectiveness of rural landscape policy. Key findings and implications are as follows. First, literature reviews of 18 landscape management studies found 37 administrative roles and 7 roles of local residents. And those roles were classified into 3 factors by similar concept: 'local government support system', 'landscape management planning', and 'promoting the participation of residents'. Second, two Delphi surveys were conducted with landscape experts to verify the validity of those evaluation items by sector. Third, factor analysis was carried out to analyze the hierarchical structure of those evaluation items. 3 sub-factors were extracted from 'local government support system' sector; 2 sub-factors from the 'landscape management planning' sector; and 4 sub-factors from the 'promoting participation of residents' sector. Fourth, the hierarchy of those evaluation factors was divided into high and low classes and sub-indexes were structured to examine the relative importance of each class and assign a relative weight on each index. The most important sub-factors were turned out as follows: 'local residents' will to practice landscape activities (0.112)', 'local government budget for rural landscape management (0.088), and 'restriction on buildings by village regulation (0.068). It indicates the viewpoints of the landscape experts that local residents' voluntary participation in landscape activities and agreement of local residents on landscape management by village, e.g. village regulation, are preconditions for successful landscape management. In addition, it is significant for a local government to secure the budget of landscape management to support local residents support.
참고문헌 (25)
- Kim, M. J., "A Study on the Assessment and the Vitalization of Town Space Projects through the Resident Participation : Based on the Ulsan, Nam-ku case", Master, pp.2011
- 김상범, "경관관련 제도변화에 따른 농촌경관계획의 발전방안 연구", 농촌계획, 18(4), pp.35~44 (2012), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- 김재준, "산림경관관리 방향 설정을 위한 지자체 관리자 의식분석", 한국임학회지, 99(4), pp.603~610 (2010), 한국임학회
- 박용하, "농촌경관관리의 인식 및 농촌경관관리 발전방안", 농촌계획, 13(3), pp.103~110 (2007), 한국농촌계획학회
- 박진현, "농어촌경관 관리정책에 대한 관련 주체의 의식분석 및 향후 과제", 농촌계획, 18(3), pp.123~135 (2012), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- Song, T. G., "An Effective Scenery Improvement Plan Considering Resource Characteristic of Forest Landscape", Journal of Korean Community Development Society, 37(2), pp.23~38
- Shin, I. S., "The study of Laws Connected with Public Participation for Sight Management", Journal of the Industrial Technology, 19(1), pp.1~8 (2013)
- 송미령, "농촌경관 보전을 위한 정책 동향과 시사점", 농촌경제, 28(3), pp.121~137 (2005), 한국농촌경제연구원
- 안덕초, "국내학술지에 게재된 농촌경관 관련 연구동향 분석", 농촌계획, 21(3), pp.121~129 (2015), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- 안영진, "경관관리의 실효성 확보를 위한 법적 개선방안", 공법학연구, 14(1), pp.303~324 (2013), 한국비교공법학회
- 윤상호, "해안지역의 경관관리방안 연구", 도시행정학보, 20(3), pp.51~75 (2007), 한국도시행정학회
- 이동근, "농촌경관 보전 및 관리를 위한 경관자원 분류 및 평가에 관한 연구 -농촌마을종합개발사업을 중심으로-", 농촌계획, 11(3) (2005), 한국농촌계획학회
- 이성창, "서울시 경관관리의 실효성 제고방안에 관한 연구 - 일본 주요도시와의 경관계획 비교분석을 통하여-", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 27(05), pp.211~220 (2011), 대한건축학회
- 이성창, "서울시 경관관리제도로서 경관자율평가제도의 운영실태 및 인식조사를 통한 개선방안 연구", 서울도시연구, 13(2), pp.141~153 (2012), 서울연구원[DOI]
- 이유직, "농촌경관관리 개선을 위한 주체 간 인식비교", 한국농촌건축학회논문집, 17(4), pp.41~48 (2015), 한국농촌건축학회
- Lee, J. W., "A study on activating plans for community participation in rural landscape planning and management", Doctor, pp.2013
- 이한석, "부산 연안의 경관관리제도 개선에 관한 연구", 한국항해항만학회지, 26(1), pp.85~94 (2002), 한국항해항만학회
- 임철희, "경관관리체계 운영실태 분석 및 개선방안 연구 - IFEZ 경관상세계획을 중심으로 -", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 28(03), pp.177~186 (2012), 대한건축학회
- 정철모, "농촌경관관리를 위한 경관농업지구의 도입방안 모색", 지역개발연구, 40(1), pp.29~41 (2008), 지역개발연구소
- 주신하, "농촌경관의 보전‧형성‧관리를 위한 정책제안 연구", 농촌계획, 14(4), pp.77~86 (2008), 한국농촌계획학회
- Chae, B. S., "A Study on the Administration and System to Improve Urban Landscape", Urban and Environment of Joenbuk University, 13(1), pp.99~113 (1998)
- Chae, H. S., "Evaluation of Rural Landscape –for and Extended Direct Payment Program for Rural Landscape in Korea", Doctor, pp.2011
- 최정선, "도시계획제도와의 관계를 고려한 경관관리제도 정비방향 연구", 도시설계, 7(2), pp.57~72 (2006), 한국도시설계학회
- Kushner, S., "Nauralistic Evaluation : Practical Knowledge for Policy Development", Research Evaluation, 3(2) (1993)
- Han, S. U., "Landscape management of Chungchungnamdo", The Chungnam Review, 25, pp.108~125 (2003)