Marginal tissue response to different Implant neck design
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Loss of the marginal bone to the first thread have been accepted but continuous effort have been made to reduce this bone loss by varying implant design and surface texture. PURPOSE: This animal study has examined the histomorphometric variations between implants with micro-thread, micro-grooved and turned surfaced neck designs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four mongrel dogs have been used the premolars removed and left to heal for three months. One of each implant systems with turned neck, micro-thread and micro-grooved were placed according to the manufacturers’protocol and left submerged for 8 and 12 weeks. These were then harvested for histological examination. RESULTS: The histologically all samples were successfully ossointegrated and active bone remodelling adjacent to implants. With the micro-grooved implants 0.40 mm and 0.26 mm of the marginal bone level changes were observed at 8 and 12 weeks respectively. The micro-threaded implants had changes of 0.79 mm and 0.56 mm at 8 and 12 weeks respectably. The turned neck designed implants had marginal bone level changes of 1.61 mm and 1.63 mm in 8 and 12 weeks specimens. A complex soft tissue arrangement could be observed against micro-threaded and micro-grooved implant surfaces. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, it could be concluded that implants with micro-grooved had the least and the turned neck designed implants had the most changes in the marginal bone level. The textured implant surfaces affect soft tissue responses.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Loss of the marginal bone to the first thread have been accepted but continuous effort have been made to reduce this bone loss by varying implant design and surface texture. PURPOSE: This animal study has examined the histomorphometric variations between implants with micro-thread, micro-grooved and turned surfaced neck designs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four mongrel dogs have been used the premolars removed and left to heal for three months. One of each implant systems with turned neck, micro-thread and micro-grooved were placed according to the manufacturers’protocol and left submerged for 8 and 12 weeks. These were then harvested for histological examination. RESULTS: The histologically all samples were successfully ossointegrated and active bone remodelling adjacent to implants. With the micro-grooved implants 0.40 mm and 0.26 mm of the marginal bone level changes were observed at 8 and 12 weeks respectively. The micro-threaded implants had changes of 0.79 mm and 0.56 mm at 8 and 12 weeks respectably. The turned neck designed implants had marginal bone level changes of 1.61 mm and 1.63 mm in 8 and 12 weeks specimens. A complex soft tissue arrangement could be observed against micro-threaded and micro-grooved implant surfaces. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, it could be concluded that implants with micro-grooved had the least and the turned neck designed implants had the most changes in the marginal bone level. The textured implant surfaces affect soft tissue responses.
참고문헌 (40)
- Adell R., "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)
- Albrektsson T., "The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp.11~25 (1986)
- Smith DE., "Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.567~572 (1989)
- Lekholm U., "Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.639~645 (1999)
- Buser D., "Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 8, pp.161~172 (1997)
- Jemt T., "A 3-year follow-up study on single implant treatment", J Dent, 21, pp.203~208 (1993)
- Chou CT., "AICRG, Part II: Crestal bone loss associated with the Ankylos implant: loading to 36 months", J Oral Implantol, 30, pp.134~143 (2004)
- de Bruyn H., "Patient's opinion and treatment outcome of fixed rehabilitation on B°ranemark implants. A 3-year follow-up study in private dental practices", Clin Oral Implants Res, 8, pp.265~271 (1997)
- Kan JY., "Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 18, pp.31~39 (2003)
- Tarnow DP., "The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest", J Periodontol, 71, pp.546~549 (2000)
- Khang W., "A multicenter study comparing dual acid-etched and machinedsurfaced implants in various bone qualities", J Periodontol, 72, pp.1384~1390 (2001)
- Ellingsen JE., "Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.659~666 (2004)
- Jung YC., "A 1-year radiographic evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.811~818 (1996)
- Abrahamsson I., "Department of Periodontology, G¨oteborg University, Sweden. The peri-implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog", Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp.212~219 (1996)
- Astrand P., "Astra Tech and Branemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions", Clin Oral Implants Res, 15, pp.413~420 (2004)
- Hansson S., "The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach", Clin Oral Implants Res, 10, pp.394~405 (1999)
- Frenkel SR., "Osseointegration on metallic implant surfaces: effects of microgeometry and growth factor treatment", J Biomed Mater Res, 63, pp.706~713 (2002)
- Sennerby L., "Structure of the bone-titanium interface in retrieved clinical oral implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 2, pp.103~111 (1991)
- Mohammadi S., "Long-term bone response to titanium implants coated with thin radiofrequent magnetronsputtered hydroxyapatite in rabbits", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.498~509 (2004)
- Kan JY., "Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 18, pp.31~39 (2003)
- Gotfredsen K., "A 5-year prospective study of single-tooth replacements supported by the Astra Tech implant: a pilot study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 6, pp.1~8 (2004)
- Tarnow D., "Vertical distance from the crest of bone to the height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants", J Periodontol, 74, pp.1785~1788 (2003)
- Tarnow DP., "The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest", J Periodontol, 71, pp.516~549 (2000)
- Pikos MA., "Block autografts for localized ridge augmentation: Part I. The posterior maxilla", Implant Dent, 8, pp.279~285 (1999)
- Woo I., "Maxillary sinus floor elevation: review of anatomy and two techniques", Implant Dent, 13, pp.28~32 (2004)
- McAllister BS., "Histologic and radiographic evidence of vertical ridge augmentation utilizing distraction osteogenesis: 10 consecutively placed distractors", J Periodontol, 72, pp.1767~1779 (2001)
- Mazzonetto R., "Clinical assessment of 40 patients subjected to alveolar distraction osteogenesis", Implant Dent, 14, pp.149~153 (2005)
- Schwartz-Arad D., "Treatment options of untreatable traumatized anterior maxillary teeth for future use of dental implantation", Implant Dent, 13, pp.11~19 (2004)
- Berglundh T., "De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 14, pp.251~262 (2003)
- Astrand P., "Rundcrantz T. Nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the treatment of the partially edentulous maxilla", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 4, pp.115~127 (2002)
- Engquist B., "Simplified methods of implant treatment in the edentulous lower jaw. A controlled prospective study. Part I: one-stage versus two-stage surgery", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 4, pp.93~103 (2002)
- Quirynen M., "Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system.", Clin Oral Implants Res, 3, pp.104~111 (1992)
- Wiskott HW., "Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: a working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone", Clin Oral Implants Res, 10, pp.429~444 (1999)
- Hansson S., "The implant thread as a retention element in cortical bone: the effect of thread size and thread profile: a finite element study", J Biomech, 36, pp.1247~1258 (2003)
- Ricci JL., "Bone response to laser microtextured surfaces", pp.282~294 (2000), Em2 Inc.
- Buser D., "Soft tissue reactions to non-submerged unloaded titanium implants in beagle dogs", J Periodontol, 63, pp.225~235 (1992)
- Abrahamsson I., "The mucosal attachment to titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in dogs", J Clin Periodontol, 29, pp.448~455 (2002)
- Chehroudi B., "Titanium-coated micromachined grooves of different dimensions affect epithelial and connective-tissue cells differently in vivo", J Biomed Mater Res, 24, pp.1203~1219 (1990)
- Kim H., "Effects of surface topography on the connective tissue attachment to subcutaneous implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 21, pp.354~365 (2006)
- Albrektsson T., "Is surgical skill more important for clinical success than changes in implant hardware?", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 3, pp.174~175 (2001)