다수 임플란트 지지 보철물에서 지대주 나사의 풀림 토크값에 대한 연구
Detorque values of abutment screws in a multiple implant-supported prosthesis
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
연구 목적: 본 연구는 다수의 임플란트에 의해 지지되는 보철물을, 두 가지 인상법에 의해 얻은 모형들에 연결한 후, 나사의 풀림 토크값을 측정하여 나사 결합부 안정성에 차이가 있는지를 알아보는데 그 목적이 있다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 네 개의 외부 육각 임플란트 (Branemark System(R) Nobel Biocare AB)에 직접 연결되는 임플란트 상부 구조물과, 이와 수동적 적합을 갖는 완전 무치악 하악주모형을 만들었다. 이 주모형에서 비연결 인상법으로 6회 인상을 채득하여 6개의 모형 (1군)을 제작하고, 아크릴릭 레진을 이용한 연결 인상법으로 6회 인상을 채득하여 6 개의 모형 (2군)을 제작하여, 총 12개의 실험모형을 제작하였다. 각 실험모형에 상부 구조물을 지대주 나사 (TorqTite(R) GoldAdapt Abutment Screw; Nobel Biocare AB)로 20 Ncm의 힘으로 조인 후 각 나사의 풀림 토크값을 총 2회 측정하였다. 두 군 간 나사의 풀림 토크값의 비교를 위한 통계분석은 반복측정을 고려하고 나사와 reading을 고정효과로, 모형을 랜덤효과로 포함하는 혼합모형 (mixed model)을 이용하여 유의수준 .05에서 실시하였다. 결과: 나사의 풀림 토크값의 평균은 7.9 Ncm (1군)과 8.1 Ncm (2군)이었으며, 4개 나사의 풀림 토크값 중 최소값인 최소 풀림 토크값의 평균은 6.1 Ncm (1군)과 6.5 Ncm (2군)이었다. 나사의 풀림 토크값은 두 군 간에 통계적으로 유의할 만한 차이가 없었고, 조인 순서와 위치가 서로 다른 4개의 나사 간의 풀림 토크값도 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다. 최소 풀림 토크값도 두 군 간에 통계적으로 유의할 만한 차이가 없었다. 결론: 다수의 외부 육각 임플란트에 의해 지지되는 보철물에서, 나사의 풀림 토크값과 최소 풀림 토크값은 비연결 인상법과 연결 인상법에 의해 얻어진 모형 간에 차이가 없어, 나사 결합부 안정성에 차이가 없는 것으로 판단된다.
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the detorque values of screws in a multiple implant-supported superstructure using stone casts made with 2 different impression techniques. Material and methods: A fully edentulous mandibular master model and a metal framework directly connected to four implants (Branemark System(R) Nobel Biocare AB) with a passive fit to each other were fabricated. Six experimental stone casts (Group 1) were made with 6 non-splinted impressions on a master cast and another 6 experimental casts (Group 2) were made with 6 acrylic resin splinted impressions. The detorque values of screws (TorqTite(R) GoldAdapt Abutment Screw; Nobel Biocare AB) were measured twice after the metal framework was fastened onto each experimental stone cast with 20 Ncm torque. Detorque values were analyzed using the mixed model with the fixed effect of screw and reading and the random effect of model for the repeated measured data at a .05 level of significance. Results: The mean detorque values were 7.9 Ncm (Group 1) and 8.1 Ncm (Group 2), and the mean of minimum detorque values were 6.1 Ncm (Group 1) and 6.5 Ncm (Group 2). No statistically significant differences between 2 groups were found and no statistically significant differences among 4 screws were found for detorque values. No statistically significant differences between 2 groups were also found for minimum detorque values. Conclusion: In a multiple external hexagon implant-supported prosthesis, no significant differences between 2 groups were found for detorque values and for minimum detorque values. There seems to be no significant differences in screw joint stability between 2 stone cast groups made with 2 different impression techniques.
참고문헌 (38)
- Worthington P, "The Swedish system of osseointegrated implants: problems and complications encountered during a 4-year trial period", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2, pp.77~84 (1987)
- Sones AD, "Complications with osseointegrated implants", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.581~585 (1989)
- Patterson EA, "Passive fit: Meaning, significance and assessment in relation to implant-supported prostheses in passive fit of implant- supported superstructures: Friction or reality?", proceedings of an international symposium, pp.17~28 (1995), Leuven University Press
- Sekine H, "Mobility characteristics and tactile sensitivity of osseointegrated fixture-supporting systems in Tissue integration in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction", pp.326~332 (1986), Excerpta Medica
- Vigolo P, "An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.470~476 (2004)
- Naconecy MM, "Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.192~198 (2004)
- Sellers GC, "Direct assembly framework for osseointegrated implant prosthesis", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.662~668 (1989)
- Jemt T, "Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6, pp.29~36 (1991)
- Becker W, "Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: a retrospective study", J Prosthet Dent, 74, pp.51~55 (1995)
- Kreissl ME, "Technical complications of implant-supported fixed partial dentures in partially edentulous cases after an average observation period of 5 years", Clin Oral Implants Res, 18, pp.720~726 (2007)
- Brägger U, "Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function", Clin Oral Implants Res, 12, pp.26~34 (2001)
- 최정한, "임플랜트 지지 상부구조물에서 나사조임순서와 조임방법이 풀림토크값에 미치는 영향", 대한치과보철학회지, 45(5), pp.653~664 (2007), 대한치과보철학회
- Tautin FS, "Impression making for osseointegrated dentures", J Prosthet Dent, 54, pp.250~251 (1985)
- Henry PJ, "An alternative method for the production of accurate casts and occlusal records in osseointegrated implant rehabilitation", J Prosthet Dent, 58, pp.694~697 (1987)
- Wee AG, "Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions", J Prosthet Dent, 83, pp.323~331 (2000)
- Assif D, "Accuracy of implant impression techniques", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.216~222 (1996)
- Haack JE, "Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.529~536 (1995)
- Martin WC, "Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces", J Prosthet Dent, 86, pp.24~32 (2001)
- Cibirka RM, "Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing", J Prosthet Dent, 85, pp.268~275 (2001)
- Goldfogel M, "Dimensional change of acrylic resin tray materials", J Prosthet Dent, 54, pp.284~286 (1985)
- Davis GB, "The bonding properties of elastomer tray adhesives", J Prosthet Dent, 36, pp.278~285 (1976)
- "Revised American Dental Association Specification no. 19 for Nonaqueous, Elastomeric Dental Impression Materials", J Am Dent Assoc, 94, pp.733~741 (1977)
- Assif D, "Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 12, pp.112~121 (1992)
- Jemt T, "Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Braånemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6, pp.270~276 (1991)
- Carr AB, "Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6, pp.448~455 (1991)
- Barrett MG, "The accuracy of six impression techniques for osseointegrated implants", J Prosthodont, 2, pp.75~82 (1993)
- Zarb GA, "The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered", J Prosthet Dent, 64, pp.185~194 (1990)
- Byrne D, "The fit of cast and premachined implant abutments", J Prosthet Dent, 80, pp.184~192 (1998)
- Carr AB, "Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.468~475 (1992)
- Bartlett DW, "The suitability of head-ofimplant and conventional abutment impression techniques for implant- retained three unit bridges: an in vitro study", Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 10, pp.163~166 (2002)
- Binon PP, "The effect of implant", abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability, 1996, pp.9, 149~160
- Pietrabissa R, "An in vitro study on compensation of mismatch of screw versus cement- retained implant supported fixed prostheses", Clin Oral Implants Res, 11, pp.448~457 (2000)
- 류석민, "치과 임플랜트 인상채득 방법에 따른 주모형의 정확성에 대한 비교 연구", 대한치과보철학회지, 40(1), pp.18~29 (2002), 대한치과보철학회
- Hsu CC, "A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant transfer techniques", J Prosthet Dent, 69, pp.588~593 (1993)
- Nissan J, "Stress levels for well-fitting implant superstructures as a function of tightening force levels, tightening sequence, and different operators", J Prosthet Dent, 86, pp.20~23 (2001)
- Watanabe F, "Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.209~218 (2000)
- 김진만, "수종 임플랜트 지대주나사의 반복하중 후나사풀림에 관한 연구", 대한치과보철학회지, 41(4), pp.519~531 (2003), 대한치과보철학회
- Merz BR, "Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.519~526 (2000)