국내에서 치료된 고정성, 가철성, 그리고 임플란트 보철물의 수명 및 성공률 분석
Analysis of longevity and success rate of fixed, removable, and implant prostheses treated in Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
목적: 이 연구의 목적은 새롭게 개발된 대한치과보철학회의 보철물 평가 기준을 적용하여 고정성, 가철성 그리고 임플란트 보철물의 성공과 실패를 평가함으로써 보철물의 수명과 이에 관련된 요인을 분석하는 데 있다. 대상 및 방법: 전국 13개 대학/종합병원 보철과에 내원한 환자들을 대상으로 구강내 사용중인 보철물을 평가하였다. 대한치과보철학회의 기준에 따라, 수는 성공, 우, 양, 가는 실패로 규정하고, 실패한 보철물의 평균 사용기간과 실패와 관련된 요인을 분석하였다. Kaplan-Meier 분석에 의한 성공률을 분석하였다. 결과: 고정성 보철 810 증례, 가철성 보철 519 증례, 그리고 임플란트 보철 475 증례, 총 1,804 증례가 연구에 포함되었다. 검사 시점에 실패로 판정된 보철물의 평균 사용기간은 고정성 보철물은 11.41 ± 0.30년, 중간값은 10년이었고, 가철성 보철물은 8.18 ± 0.29년, 중간값 7년이었으며, 임플란트 보철물은 7.99 ± 0.30년, 중간값은 7년이었다. 실패와 관련있는 요인 중 고정성보철물은 유닛 수, 지대치 수, 근관치료된 지대치 수, 치태지수였고, 가철성 보철물의 경우 대합치였으며 임플란트 보철의 경우 임플란트 개수, 사용기간, 치태지수였다. 결론: 대한치과보철학회의 기준으로 보철물을 평가한 결과, 실패한 보철물의 평균수명은 고정성 11.41년, 가철성 8.18년, 그리고 임플란트 보철물은 7.99년이었다.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors affecting the longevity of failed prosthesis and the success rate of the prosthesis based on the data evaluated with the newly developed Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (KAP) criteria. Materials and methods: Evaluation was performed in the restored prosthesis for patients who visited the prosthodontics department of the 13 dental university hospitals and general hospitals. The status of the prosthesis was classified into four categories: Good, Fair, Bad, Worst. The success was recorded if only the category was classified in ‘good’. The mean duration of failed prostheses and the success rate through Kaplan-Meier method were analyzed. Results: A total of 1,804 cases of prosthesis were evaluated: 810 cases of fixed dental prostheses (FDP), 519 cases of Removable Dental Prostheses (RDP), and 475 cases of implant prosthesis. The mean duration of failed FDP was 11.41 ± 0.30 years and the median was 10 years. The mean duration of failed RDP was 8.18 ± 0.29 years and the median was 7 years. The mean duration of failed implant prosthesis was 7.99 ± 0.30 years and the median was 7 years. The factors related to the failure were as follows: number of units, abutments, abutments treated with root canal, and plaque index in FDPs; treated and opposing dentition in RDPs; the number of implants, duration of use, and plaque index in implant prostheses. Conclusion: The average duration of failed prosthesis was 11.41 years for FDPs, 8.18 years for RDPs, and 7.99 years for implant prosthesis, according to the evaluation with newly developed KAP criteria.
참고문헌 (28)
- 권병기, "치과임상영역에서 발생된 의료분쟁의 판례분석", Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain, 31(4), pp.283~296 (2006), 대한안면통증∙구강내과학회
- "Implant treatment is the most common dental disputes"[URL]
- 차유림, "인터넷 사이트를 통해 살펴본 의료사고 및 의료분쟁의 현황에 관한 분석", Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain, 31(4), pp.297~316 (2006), 대한안면통증∙구강내과학회
- 박선규, "치과의사의 설문을 통해 본 치과의료사고 및 분쟁", 대한치과의사협회지, 53(2), pp.103~110 (2015), 대한치과의사협회[DOI]
- Schwartz NL, "Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: Life-span and causes for loss of serviceability", J Am Dent Assoc, 81, pp.1395~1401 (1970)[DOI]
- Foster LV, "Failed conventional bridge work from general dental practice: clinical aspects and treatment needs of 142 cases", Br Dent J, 168, pp.199~201 (1990)[DOI]
- Valderhaug J, "A 15-year clinical evaluation of fixed prosthodontics", Acta Odontol Scand, 49, pp.35~40 (1991)[DOI]
- Report on the longevity of prostheses, "Yang JH", Korean Academy of Prosthodontics, ~ (2001)
- 신우진, "LONGEVITY AND FAILURE ANALYSIS OF FIXED RESTORATIONS SERVICED IN KOREA", 대한치과보철학회지, 43(2), pp.158~175 (2005), 대한치과보철학회
- 윤미정, "고정성 보철물의 임상적 상태에 대한 평가", 대한치과보철학회지, 47(2), pp.99~107 (2009), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- 윤준호, "보철물 수명 연구를 위한 대한치과보철학회 표준 방안: KAP Criteria", 대한치과보철학회지, 54(4), pp.341~353 (2016), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Walton JN, "A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: Length of service and reasons for replacement", J Prosthet Dent, 56, pp.416~421 (1986)[DOI]
- Libby G, "Longevity of fixed partial dentures", J Prosthet Dent, 78, pp.127~131 (1997)[DOI]
- Vermeulen AHBM, "Ten-year evaluation of removable partial dentures: Survival rates based on retreatment, not wearing and replacement", J Prosthet Dent, 76, pp.267~272 (1996)[DOI]
- Sundh B, "A study of fixed prosthodontics performed at a university clinic 18 years after insertion", Int J Prosthodont, 10, pp.513~519 (1997)
- Lindquist E, "Success rate and failures for fixed partial dentures after 20 years of service: Part I", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.133~138 (1998)
- Holm C, "Longevity and quality of FPDs: a retrospective study of restorations 30, 20, and 10 years after insertion", Int J Prosthodont, 16, pp.283~289 (2003)
- Creugers NH, "A meta-analysis of durability data on conventional fixed bridges", Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 22, pp.448~452 (1994)[DOI]
- Scurria MS, "Meta-analysis of fixed partial denture survival: prostheses and abutments", J Prosthet Dent, 79, pp.459~464 (1998)[DOI]
- Pjetursson BE, "All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs", Dent Mater, 31, pp.624~639 (2015)[DOI]
- Pjetursson BE, "A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years", Clin Oral Implants Res, 15, pp.625~642 (2004)[DOI]
- Moldovan O, "Clinical performance of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition: a systematic literature review", Clin Oral Investig, 20, pp.1435~1447 (2016)[DOI]
- Pjetursson BE, "A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.22~38 (2012)
- Sax C, "10-year clinical outcomes of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks", Int J Comput Dent, 14, pp.183~202 (2011)
- Schwartz NL, "Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: life-span and causes for loss of serviceability", J Am Dent Assoc, 81, pp.1395~1401 (1970)[DOI]
- Goodacre CJ, "Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 90, pp.121~132 (2003)[DOI]
- Schmitter M, "Clinical performance of long-span zirconia frameworks for fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results", J Oral Rehabil, 39, pp.552~557 (2012)[DOI]
- Sailer I, "Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures", Int J Prosthodont, 20, pp.383~388 (2007)