본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

농업환경보전프로그램 이행단계별 문제점 및 애로사항에 대한 이해당사자별 인식 비교

A Comparative Study of the Perceptions by Stakeholder on the Problems and Difficulties at Implementation Stages of the Agricultural Environment Conservation Program

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

The Agricultural Environmental Conservation Program is a useful system for creating sustainable agriculture and environmentally friendly and comfortable rural areas. However, there are still many problems and difficulties, such as the establishment of necessary activities and plans by the residents themselves, and improvements are required. The degree of importance and difficulties according to the implementation stage of each stakeholder was quantified and compared with each other, and the specific difficulties recognized by on-site support organizations were structurally analyzed. It was analyzed that the importance and difficulties of the project implementation stage for local government officials and the project implementation planning stage for on-site support organizations were very high, indicating that they perceived the most need for improvement. On the other hand, 21 specific problems and difficulties were derived based on the results of the literature survey and stakeholder interviews. As a result of the structural analysis using the DEMATEL method, the most influential factor was the low understanding of the project by residents, the most influential factor was the lack of collecting and reflecting residents' opinions, the most central factor was the lack of collecting and reflecting residents' opinions, and the most causal factor was the lack of education and promotion of the project. The results indicate that a more stable system can be established if continuous promotion and education, periodic meetings and discussions, active reflection of residents' opinions in project implementation plans, and simplification of implementation inspection and project cost execution through the implementation inspection platform are promoted. Despite the limitations, considering that no institutional analysis of agricultural environmental conservation programs has been conducted so far, the results of this study are expected to serve as a basis for the establishment of relevant policies in the future.

Abstract

The Agricultural Environmental Conservation Program is a useful system for creating sustainable agriculture and environmentally friendly and comfortable rural areas. However, there are still many problems and difficulties, such as the establishment of necessary activities and plans by the residents themselves, and improvements are required. The degree of importance and difficulties according to the implementation stage of each stakeholder was quantified and compared with each other, and the specific difficulties recognized by on-site support organizations were structurally analyzed. It was analyzed that the importance and difficulties of the project implementation stage for local government officials and the project implementation planning stage for on-site support organizations were very high, indicating that they perceived the most need for improvement. On the other hand, 21 specific problems and difficulties were derived based on the results of the literature survey and stakeholder interviews. As a result of the structural analysis using the DEMATEL method, the most influential factor was the low understanding of the project by residents, the most influential factor was the lack of collecting and reflecting residents' opinions, the most central factor was the lack of collecting and reflecting residents' opinions, and the most causal factor was the lack of education and promotion of the project. The results indicate that a more stable system can be established if continuous promotion and education, periodic meetings and discussions, active reflection of residents' opinions in project implementation plans, and simplification of implementation inspection and project cost execution through the implementation inspection platform are promoted. Despite the limitations, considering that no institutional analysis of agricultural environmental conservation programs has been conducted so far, the results of this study are expected to serve as a basis for the establishment of relevant policies in the future.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 정남식, "공동체 의식이 농업환경보전프로그램 참여태도에 미치는 영향 분석", 관광레저연구, 33(1), pp.377~394 (2021), (사)한국관광레저학회
  2. Korea Rural Economic Institute, "Finding Ways to improve the Agricultural Environment through the Agricultural Environmental Conservation Program", ~ (2018)
  3. Korea Rural Economic Institute, "Challenges and Ways to Improve the Agricultural Environmental Conservation Program", ~ (2019)
  4. 현준기, "농업환경 보전 프로그램 중 토양탄소 저장 증진 영농활동의 효과 정량화 방법론", 한국기후변화학회지, 12(6), pp.701~712 (2021), 한국기후변화학회[DOI]
  5. 김현웅, "농업환경보전 프로그램 사업대상지 선정기준의 상대적 중요도 분석", 한국유기농업학회지, 30(4), pp.485~497 (2022), 한국유기농업학회
  6. 김명현, "농업환경보전프로그램의 효과 검증을 위한 지표식물 선정", 한국환경농학회지, 40(3), pp.169~178 (2021), 한국환경농학회[DOI]
  7. Lankoski, J., "Guidelines for Cost-effective Agri-Environmental Policy Measures", OECD, ~ (2010)
  8. Lee, J. H, "Practices and Improvements in Agricultural Environmental Conservation Programs", Agricultural Policy Research Quarterly, 70, pp.174~195 (2019)
  9. Martilla, J. A., "Importance-Performance Analysis", Journal of Marketing, 41(1), pp.77~79 (1977)
  10. 임성근, "IPA 분석을 활용한 정부3.0 ‘서비스 정부’에 대한 공급자와 수요자 간 인식 차이 분석", 행정논총, 55(2), pp.137~167 (2017), 한국행정연구소
  11. 박수진, "IPA를 활용한 문화관광축제 서비스품질 평가: 광주 추억의 충장축제를 대상으로", 한국지역개발학회지, 28(2), pp.131~152 (2016), 한국지역개발학회
  12. 김수진, "DEMATEL기법을 활용한 도농교류 비활성화 요인 구조화 분석", 농촌계획, 28(1), pp.89~98 (2022), 한국농촌계획학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)